--- title: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan description: I hope the D.C. Circuit will be able see that the Clean Power Plan is legal, it’s flexible and it’s in line with the market. canonical: https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/ author: Christine Todd Whitman article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-09-26T13:40:41.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-03-31T10:12:15.776Z article:section: Ideas og:title: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan og:description: Fighting climate change should not be a partisan issue og:url: https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2ccfcdbe9da8b990/6988a74ccf40a84dbcc44ee9/clean_power_plan.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4266 og:image:height: 2400 og:image:alt: Clean Power Plan og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan twitter:description: Fighting climate change should not be a partisan issue twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2ccfcdbe9da8b990/6988a74ccf40a84dbcc44ee9/clean_power_plan.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Former EPA Administrator: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ce3b635-c1da-4287-8933-10daa49e2088&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ce3b635-c1da-4287-8933-10daa49e2088&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=6ce3b635-c1da-4287-8933-10daa49e2088&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6ce3b635-c1da-4287-8933-10daa49e2088&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Christine Todd Whitman](https://time.com/author/christine-todd-whitman/) ## Christine Todd Whitman Sep 26, 2016 1:40 PM UTC  Smoke no longer rises out of the smokestacks at the coal-fired Castle Gate Power Plant outside Helper, Utah, Aug. 3, 2015\. The plant was closed in anticipation of new EPA regulations. Smoke no longer rises out of the smokestacks at the coal-fired Castle Gate Power Plant outside Helper, Utah, Aug. 3, 2015\. The plant was closed in anticipation of new EPA regulations. George Frey—Reuters by [Christine Todd Whitman](https://time.com/author/christine-todd-whitman/) ## Christine Todd Whitman Sep 26, 2016 1:40 PM UTC Conservation and protecting our environment—including fighting climate change, should not be partisan issues. After all, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which I had the privilege of leading from 2001-2003, was created by a Republican, President Richard Nixon. And the last major update to the Clean Air Act passed with overwhelming bipartisan majorities in the Congress, and it was signed into law by another Republican, President George H.W. Bush. The Clean Air Act has proved to be a powerful tool for reducing dangerous air pollution and protecting public health. And it has done this while driving innovation and without hampering economic growth. From 1985 to 2003, the size of our economy nearly [doubled](https://thinkprogress.org/george-bushs-epa-chief-clean-power-plan-is-most-flexible-thing-the-agency-has-done-9e17682f6cf3#.qyd9e4jd1) and energy use increased by 30%. At the same time, we managed to reduce the emissions of six major pollutants regulated by the EPA by 60%. The idea that the EPA is a job killer is simply false. Today, the Clean Air Act is being put to work once again, this time against climate change, the most daunting environmental challenge that we face. In order to meet this challenge, the EPA created the [Clean Power Plan](http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-23/obama-s-clean-power-plan-heads-to-court-what-to-know), which will significantly reduce [emissions](http://www.c2es.org/federal/executive/epa/clean-power-plan) from the power sector, which is responsible for almost 40% of the carbon pollution in the U.S.—the single largest source. As is too often the case today when it comes to action to combat climate change, the Clean Power Plan is the subject of heated debate and controversy. More than two dozen states along with energy companies have gone to court to block the plan, facing off against the Obama administration and a large coalition of other states, environmental groups, organizations including the American Lung Association, national security experts, corporate leaders, and, notably, a group of utilities favoring the plan. As the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, the powerful appeals court just a few blocks from the Supreme Court, prepares to hear arguments in this case, it’s important to cut through the noise in order to understand the facts. First, the EPA’s authority to move forward with regulating carbon pollution under the Clean Air Act is not a matter of debate. EPA has this authority, and it is in fact _obligated_ to move forward. The law says so and the Supreme Court has said so, twice. As [I have said before](http://www.app.com/story/news/local/new-jersey/2014/06/18/whitman-supports-epa-muscle-climate-change/10827109/), the matter, I believe, should be put to rest. While it would have been better for Congress to have acted, the EPA was well within its jurisdiction. It’s also important to understand that the Clean Power Plan is not a rigid, one-size-fits-all regulation that ignores local conditions or concerns. It offers states extraordinary flexibility in how they comply with their obligations—as much flexibility as I have ever seen EPA allow. I believe EPA has gone as far as it possibly could have under the law in providing states with fair and flexible options for reducing carbon pollution. Finally, the Clean Power Plan was not proposed in a vacuum. Huge, market-driven shifts in the power sector toward cleaner sources of generation were underway well before EPA even proposed the Clean Power Plan. The Clean Power Plan will accelerate this shift, but the shift is being driven by the market. In fact, many states, including some of those who have taken EPA to court, are [well on their way](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climatechange-lawsuit-insight-idUSKCN11O0E1?il=0) to meeting their obligations under the plan. Arkansas, for example, already emitted less carbon pollution from power plants last year than the Clean Power Plan calls for it to have in 2030. This endless debate and endless litigation are not only bad for the climate; they’re also bad for business. Instead of illuminating a clear path forward, these attacks on the Clean Power Plan are just creating more uncertainty, the enemy of business. That’s why it’s not surprising that some utilities and dozens of major American corporations are calling for the court to uphold the plan. They know that action to reduce carbon pollution is both necessary and inevitable, and they want to adapt their plans to this carbon-constrained future. With so much at stake, it’s time that we move forward. On Tuesday, I hope the D.C. Circuit will be able see the clear facts in this case: the Clean Power Plan is legal, it’s flexible, it’s in line with where the market is already going, and it will allow EPA to tackle our biggest environmental challenge using the same smart, effective and economically responsible approach that it has successfully employed for decades. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/"},"headline":"Former EPA Administrator: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan","datePublished":"2016-09-26T13:40:41.000Z","dateModified":"2026-03-31T10:12:15.776Z","description":"'I hope the D.C. Circuit will be able see the clear facts in this case'","url":"https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/","keywords":["politics","Environment"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2ccfcdbe9da8b990/6988a74ccf40a84dbcc44ee9/clean_power_plan.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Christine Todd Whitman","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/christine-todd-whitman/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2ccfcdbe9da8b990/6988a74ccf40a84dbcc44ee9/clean_power_plan.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Clean Power Plan","caption":"Smoke no longer rises out of the smokestacks at the coal-fired Castle Gate Power Plant outside Helper, Utah, Aug. 3, 2015. The plant was closed in anticipation of new EPA regulations.","creditText":"George Frey—Reuters","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4506099/christine-todd-whitman-clean-power-plan/","name":"Former EPA Administrator: We Must Move Forward on Clean Power Plan"}}]}] ```