TIME Video Games

Pokémon Go Is Easier To Play in Affluent, White Neighborhoods, Report Finds

pokemon go inequality portals dc
Jim Watson—AFP/Getty Images A woman plays Pokemon Go in Lafayette Park in front of the White House in Washington, DC,

The Urban Institute analyzed data for Washington, D.C.

Pokémon Go seems like it’s everywhere — but it may not be everywhere equally, according to a report from the Urban Institute.

Players advance by finding Pokéstops and gyms on the digital map by physically going to the corresponding locations in the real world, and the analysis of Washington, D.C. suggests those stops are way more likely to be in relatively affluent or white neighborhoods.

“In neighborhoods that are majority white, there are 55 portals on average, compared with 19 portals in neighborhoods that are majority black,” wrote Shiva Kooragayala and Tanaya Srini in the report. They added that this disparity held true even when they controlled for population density and the amount of millennials living in the neighborhoods.

The report analyzes data about portals in Niantic’s earlier game Ingress, and the company used the same geographic map and information to construct the world of Pokémon Go. The issue may stem from how users used to be able to suggest portal locations for Ingress, and the game’s user base was skewed towards younger, male English-speakers.

Plenty have lauded the good that Pokémon Go can do by encouraging people to discover their cities, but that good can become another way to perpetuate inequality if it passes over neighborhoods that aren’t wealthy or majority white. At the very least, fewer Pokéstops makes the game less fun — and potentially more expensive, if people choose to make in-app purchases to progress.

[Urban Institute]

Tap to read full story

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at http://update.microsoft.com


YOU BROKE TIME.COM!

Dear TIME Reader,

As a regular visitor to TIME.com, we are sure you enjoy all the great journalism created by our editors and reporters. Great journalism has great value, and it costs money to make it. One of the main ways we cover our costs is through advertising.

The use of software that blocks ads limits our ability to provide you with the journalism you enjoy. Consider turning your Ad Blocker off so that we can continue to provide the world class journalism you have become accustomed to.

The TIME Team