--- title: DNC: Division Over Trade, TPP Marks Democratic Convention description: A building rebellion canonical: https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/ author: Haley Sweetland Edwards article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-07-29T00:36:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T23:36:03.192Z article:section: Politics og:title: DNC: Division Over Trade, TPP Marks Democratic Convention og:description: A building rebellion og:url: https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb19ce76cf910d78c/69889f3c3c1639292045e31e/landon-nordeman-hillary-clinton-dnc-democratic-national-convention-13.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2560 og:image:height: 1440 og:image:alt: TIMEPOL DNC og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: DNC: Division Over Trade, TPP Marks Democratic Convention twitter:description: A building rebellion twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb19ce76cf910d78c/69889f3c3c1639292045e31e/landon-nordeman-hillary-clinton-dnc-democratic-national-convention-13.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Division On Trade Disrupts Democratic Convention > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=cce4d947-4f17-4eb1-a691-9d9feb3f4dd6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=cce4d947-4f17-4eb1-a691-9d9feb3f4dd6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=cce4d947-4f17-4eb1-a691-9d9feb3f4dd6&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jul 29, 2016 12:36 AM UTC  Delegates chant "No TPP" at the 2016 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia on Monday, July 25, 2016. Delegates chant "No TPP" at the 2016 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia on Monday, July 25, 2016. Landon Nordeman for TIME  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jul 29, 2016 12:36 AM UTC On the Democratic National Convention floor this week, delegates appeared to agree on most issues—stronger gun control, comprehensive immigration reform, equal pay, you name it. Free trade, however, was a glaring exception. “For a lot of us, it’s a major problem,” said Paul Schipper, a 28-year-old delegate, referring specifically to the Obama administration’s signature trade deal, the Trans-Pacific Partnership. The deal, which would link the U.S. and eleven other Pacific Rim nations, has already been signed and is expected to go up for a vote in Congress after the November election. Although the soon-to-be-official Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has promised repeatedly that she will not support the TPP—”and that means [before and after the election](http://www.citizenstrade.org/ctc/oregon/),” she says—many liberal Democrats, including Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ delegates at the convention, were skeptical. “It’s a nightmare scenario,” said Kim Netherton, a 32-year-old delegate from Lakewood, Colorado, pointing at the rumor, [fanned this week](http://time.com/4426483/dnc-hillary-clinton-trans-pacific-partnership/) by Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, who predicted that Clinton will reverse course after the election. “She’s given us lip service on the TPP, but once she gets what she wants, will she revert back? That’s one of our greatest fears.” Protests over trade were common on the floor throughout the convention. Three of the most prominent party leaders who favor TPP—Vice President Joe Biden, Vice Presidential nominee Tim Kaine, and President Obama—faced demonstrations from delegates when the spoke. The dissidents, largely from California, Texas and Florida, held up signs, and refused to cheer. During most of Obama’s speech, another group of delegates unfurled a homemade sign, painted on a sheet, that read, “TPP KILLS DEMOCRACY.” Schipper, the delegate from South Dakota, said he was asked to either put away his anti-TPP sign or leave the arena during Kaine’s speech. Biden, Kaine, and Obama all steered clear of any mention of the controversial agreement. As the TPP has become a political third rail for Democratic leaders, the larger question of where rank-and-file Democrats stand on free trade deals, globalization, and outsourcing has become increasingly complex. A generation ago, the divide was clear: Republicans were free-traders, while Democrats embraced a protectionist platform. But in recent years, the electorate has shifted. A [2015 Pew Research Center](http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2015/01/08/americans-agree-on-trade-good-for-the-country-but-not-great-for-jobs/) study found that 71% of Democrats said that trade and business ties between the U.S. and other nations are good for the country, but the vast majority did not expect free trade deals to personally benefit them. Fewer than a quarter of Americans, Democrats and Republicans alike, agreed that trade deals create jobs or lead to higher wages. Both major political parties have scrambled to get ahead of voters’ shifting positions, often with flummoxing results. Obama, who ran in 2008 on the promise to take down NAFTA, now calls the TPP “the most progressive trade deal in history,” while Republican nominee Donald Trump, has [alienated the traditional Republican establishment](http://time.com/4425217/dnc-hillary-clinton-republicans/?xid=tcoshare) by championing punitive tariffs and other protectionist moves. At the Democrats’ convention in Philadelphia, delegates reflected these shifting views. Many who were opposed to the TPP told TIME that they were not opposed to _all_ trade deals, while those who espoused support for the TPP rarely did so without caveat. “Free trade agreements are very complicated,” said Jonathan Rothschild, the mayor of Tucson and an Arizona delegate for Clinton. He pointed to the sheer size of the TPP, which is many hundreds of pages and includes minute rules on everything from intellectual property to wildlife trafficking. “Striking the right balance on every issue is difficult,” he said. Schipper, the South Dakota delegate who supports Sanders, also offered a nuanced position. While he wore an anti-TPP pin and listed the TPP among his primary concerns this election cycle, he recognized the need for thoughtful trade agreements. “I’m not anti-globalization,” he said, adding that he recognized the need to negotiate lower tariffs and quotas, and to rebalance certain trade deficits. But he and many other people in the anti-TPP crowd object to the other hundreds of global rules and regulations governing things like corporate property rights and pharmaceutical patent protection that “put corporate interests above those of the American people,” he said. Netherton, the Colorado delegate, also listed the investment chapter of the TPP—a chapter that has nothing to do with tariffs, quota or trade in the traditional sense—as one of the most worrisome. That chapter includes a controversial enforcement mechanism, Investor-State Dispute Settlement, that allows foreign corporations to challenge the laws and regulations of sovereign nations, including the U.S., outside of national court systems. The [Democratic Party’s platform](https://www.demconvention.com/platform/), finalized last week, reflects these concerns, but walks a careful balance. The text, touted as the most progressive in recent history, leaves the door open to future trade deals, but demands more exacting criteria. “Over the past three decades, America has signed too many trade deals that have not lived up to the hype,” the platform reads. “Trade deals often boosted the profits of large corporations, while at the same time failing to protect workers’ rights, labor standards, the environment, and public health.” Schipper said he’d be fine supporting trade deals in the future that did just that. “I’d be very much inclined to support an agreement that took into account human rights and the well-being of American workers,” he said. “I think a lot of people would support that.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/"},"headline":"Division On Trade Disrupts Democratic Convention","datePublished":"2016-07-29T00:36:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T23:36:03.192Z","description":"A building rebellion","url":"https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/","keywords":["Democratic National Convention","Hillary Clinton","Barack Obama","trade"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb19ce76cf910d78c/69889f3c3c1639292045e31e/landon-nordeman-hillary-clinton-dnc-democratic-national-convention-13.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Haley Sweetland Edwards","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltb19ce76cf910d78c/69889f3c3c1639292045e31e/landon-nordeman-hillary-clinton-dnc-democratic-national-convention-13.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"TIMEPOL DNC","caption":"Delegates chant \"No TPP\" at the 2016 Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia on Monday, July 25, 2016.","creditText":"Landon Nordeman for TIME","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/democratic-national-convention/","name":"Democratic National Convention"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4427424/dnc-trade-tpp-democratic-convention-hillary-clinton/","name":"Division On Trade Disrupts Democratic Convention"}}]}] ```