--- title: DNC: Democrats Are Not Inclusive description: To become righteous and powerful again, the Democratic Party cannot exclude the downtrodden and those who disagree canonical: https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/ author: Christopher Hale article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-07-26T17:11:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T23:33:15.360Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Democratic Party Is Not One of Inclusiveness og:description: To become righteous and powerful again, it cannot exclude the downtrodden og:url: https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5d487ce334eef518/69889f5ccd1bba0288701a68/dnc-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrats-election-2016-convention-president.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3537 og:image:height: 1990 og:image:alt: Democratic National Convention: Day One og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Democratic Party Is Not One of Inclusiveness twitter:description: To become righteous and powerful again, it cannot exclude the downtrodden twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5d487ce334eef518/69889f5ccd1bba0288701a68/dnc-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrats-election-2016-convention-president.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Democratic Party Is Not One of Inclusiveness > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=970d28dc-6abf-41d0-92d4-90d6cbeb4b8c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=970d28dc-6abf-41d0-92d4-90d6cbeb4b8c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=970d28dc-6abf-41d0-92d4-90d6cbeb4b8c&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Christopher Hale](https://time.com/author/christopher-j-hale-2/) ## Christopher Hale Jul 26, 2016 5:11 PM UTC  Sen. Bernie Sanders delivers remarks at the Democratic National Convention on July 25, 2016\. Sanders lost the Democratic nomination to Hillary Clinton, who he urged his supporters to vote for. Sen. Bernie Sanders delivers remarks at the Democratic National Convention on July 25, 2016\. Sanders lost the Democratic nomination to Hillary Clinton, who he urged his supporters to vote for.Drew Angerer—Getty Images by [Christopher Hale](https://time.com/author/christopher-j-hale-2/) ## Christopher Hale Jul 26, 2016 5:11 PM UTC Anyone who tells you the Democratic Party is united is lying. A bitter and hard-fought primary between Hillary Clinton and [Bernie Sanders](http://time.com/4423362/democratic-convention-bernie-sanders-revolution/) is only the part of the fruit of an increasing divide between the old-guard establishment and the new democratic populist movement on issues across the board. The leadership of outgoing Chairperson of the Democratic National Committee [Debbie Wasserman-Schultz](http://time.com/4421045/debbie-wasserman-schultz-dnc-chair-resign-convention/) did not help bridge this growing divide. But the problem extends way past her. The Democratic Party has their lowest number of elected officials in Congress since the Hoover Administration. And since 2010, [Democrats have lost](http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/jan/25/cokie-roberts/have-democrats-lost-900-seats-state-legislatures-o/) 912 state legislative seats and 30 state legislative chambers. If it weren’t for President Obama’s two consecutive victories, it would be the Democrats—not the Republicans—who would be fielding questions about their party’s possible extinction. If the party wants to win back at both state and national levels, it needs to regains its identity as the party for everyone. This radical inclusivity is at the heart of the progressive tradition. And while it sounds romantic, in practice it isn’t easy. It requires an openness to those who disagree with the party establishment on a variety of issues. [Joe Biden](http://americamagazine.org/content/all-things/biden-interview-starts-new-conversations-abortion-debate) said it well last year: The Democratic Party should be a big-tent, open to people of different beliefs. He’s right. A Democratic Party that welcomes everyone is a party with a bright future. Among Americans right now, there’s a fear that an oligarchy of exclusion marks our nation’s politics. The winner of the 2016 elections will be the party that rejects that. The Democratic Party hasn’t done enough to convince the American people that they do. Their platform is a good example of this reality. It leaves little room for those who, like Secretary Clinton, [oppose the Trans-Pacific Partnership](https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/09/sanders-loses-on-trade-at-democratic-platform-meeting/). It doesn’t resonate with young people of all political stripes in the United States and across the globe who believe that a new way of peace, justice and reconciliation with human rights at the center must govern [the conflict between Israel and Palestine](http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2016/07/10/democratic-platform-committee-rejects-amendment-rebuking-israel/). And finally, it belittles the [21 million Americans](http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-day-and-camosy-democratic-platform-abortion-20160725-snap-story,amp.html) who proudly identify as Democrats, but disagree with the party’s stance on reproductive rights and believe that there is a right-to-life from conception. No one’s naïve enough to think that the party will change its views on these issues. More than asking for significant policy changes, many disaffected progressives are asking that the platform express clearly that there is a place for Americans in the Democratic Party who disagree with the party on these and other issues. Such language will go a long way in assuring Democrats and progressives across that the nation that this is party for everyone—without exception. The Democrats’ stance on abortion is particularly troubling. Bill Clinton argued during his presidency that abortion should be “safe, legal, and rare.” During her 2008 race, Hillary Clinton echoed and even strengthened her husband’s sentiments when she said abortion should be “safe, legal and rare, and by rare, I mean _rare._ _”_ Those days are long gone for the Democratic Party. Clinton’s argument today is that abortion should be safe and legal. _Rare_ is nowhere to be found. Even more, Clinton and the party have announced their opposition to the Hyde Amendment, which prohibits federal funding of abortion except in rare circumstances. Pro-choice activists hailed this as a new day for their movement. They’re absolutely right. And it too is a new day for the Democratic Party. Michael Wear and Russell Moore [said it well](http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2016/07/24/abortion-democratic-convention-platform-hyde-amendment-column/87436404/) in _USA Today_: --- > “” --- So much for inclusivity being at the heart of this party’s vision. As of right now, those days are over. The Democratic Party in 2016 has sadly adopted a politics of exclusion, where those who were once welcomed no longer have a home. Some will argue that such is [the price for standing on firm values](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/24/us/politics/obama-democrats-dnc.html?ref=todayspaper&%5Fr=0). But how meaningful are a party’s values if they’ve proven time and again whole ineffective in winning elections? As the past cycles have indicated, stubborn ideological purity isn’t the way to win perhaps the most important election in our nation’s history. If the Democratic Party wants to win in November and win in the future, it must back away from this bourgeoisie, data-driven politics of exclusion and regain a politics of inclusivity and accompaniment, with a particular focus for those on the margins. Too often today’s Democratic Party speaks to the nation’s ideals, but does little to address the real concerns of the downtrodden. Hillary Clinton can and must change that. If she and the party can practice a politics from below, where the joys and hopes and sufferings and anxieties of the nation’s most excluded people are the joys and hopes and sufferings and anxieties of the party’s standard bearer, they will help the United States avoid what is so rightly fears: a Donald Trump presidency. That’s definitely a price worth paying. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/"},"headline":"The Democratic Party Is Not One of Inclusiveness","datePublished":"2016-07-26T17:11:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T23:33:15.360Z","description":"To become righteous and powerful again, the party cannot exclude the downtrodden and those who disagree","url":"https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5d487ce334eef518/69889f5ccd1bba0288701a68/dnc-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrats-election-2016-convention-president.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Christopher Hale","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/christopher-j-hale-2/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5d487ce334eef518/69889f5ccd1bba0288701a68/dnc-bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton-democrats-election-2016-convention-president.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Democratic National Convention: Day One","caption":"Sen. Bernie Sanders at the Democratic National Convention","creditText":"Drew Angerer—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4423975/democratic-party-divided/","name":"The Democratic Party Is Not One of Inclusiveness"}}]}] ```