--- title: Marriage: Do You Have a Right to Privacy? description: In order to fully modernize marriage we need to resist the degrading urge to spy on our spouses and acknowledge the right to privacy. canonical: https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/ author: Stephanie Fairyington article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-08-08T14:58:34.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:04:26.650Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Do You Have a Right to Privacy in Your Marriage? og:description: To modernize marriage, we must resist the urge to spy on our spouses og:url: https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Do You Have a Right to Privacy in Your Marriage? twitter:description: To modernize marriage, we must resist the urge to spy on our spouses twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Do You Have a Right to Privacy in Your Marriage? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=d29b796c-a154-479e-8c65-ec6fca9d9db6&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=d29b796c-a154-479e-8c65-ec6fca9d9db6&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=d29b796c-a154-479e-8c65-ec6fca9d9db6&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: A 100-Year-Old Sex Therapist on Having Good Sex, Then and Now [Watch (HLS stream): A 100-Year-Old Sex Therapist on Having Good Sex, Then and Now](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/uJFYIrvP.m3u8) (3:13)  _Published 2014-08-20. A practicing sex therapist in New York City, Dr. Shirley Zussman has witnessed everything from the legalization of the contraceptive birth control pill to the AIDs epidemic in the 1980s to the rise of internet porn in the new millenium._ by [Stephanie Fairyington](https://time.com/author/stephanie-fairyington/) ## Stephanie Fairyington Aug 8, 2016 2:58 PM UTC by [Stephanie Fairyington](https://time.com/author/stephanie-fairyington/) ## Stephanie Fairyington Aug 8, 2016 2:58 PM UTC _Privacy_, a new off-Broadway play starring Daniel Radcliffe at the Public Theater in New York City, contemplates all the ways in which the digital revolution has destroyed privacy—and it mourns for its loss. The provocative production got me thinking about renowned couple’s counselor Esther Perel’s Ted Talk, “[Rethinking Infidelity](http://www.ted.com/talks/esther%5Fperel%5Frethinking%5Finfidelity%5Fa%5Ftalk%5Ffor%5Fanyone%5Fwho%5Fhas%5Fever%5Floved?language=en).” In her eloquent lecture, she discusses the ways in which our privacy has dramatically decreased due to technological innovations, while our access to sexual possibilities has exponentially increased for the same reason, making the expectation of marital monogamy far harder to fulfill, and infidelity far easier to discover. Despite the frightening and ever-expanding ways to electronically snoop, in order to fully modernize marriage we need to resist the degrading urge to spy on our spouses and acknowledge, in radical opposition to our times, each individual’s right to privacy _within_ matrimony, including the right to act in our own sexual and romantic self-interests independent of our partner’s knowledge or consent. (Bear with me.) Seismic cultural shifts over the last decade suggest that the monogamy imperative’s days are numbered. Digital technology—innumerable dating sites, hook-up apps and social media platforms—have made sex far more accessible than it’s ever been, proving the comedian Chris Rock’s [joke](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/joshua-pompey/infidelity%5Fb%5F2415595.html) increasingly true: you’re only as faithful as your options. Today, up to 75% of us stray in one form or another according Perel, author of the best-selling [_Mating in Captivity_](https://www.amazon.com/dp/0060753641/?tag=timecom-20). Alongside the proliferation of sexual opportunities for regular Joes and Janes, America’s greater acceptance of same-sex love and desire has strongly challenged conventional sexual morality. Some [legal scholars even argue](http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4712&context=flr) that the logic laid out in the Supreme Court’s opinion in _Lawrence vs. Texas_, which over-turned anti-sodomy laws, set the groundwork for the decriminalization of adultery laws, which are rarely enforced but still on the books in more than 20 states. While sexual progressives have long advocated for the superior ethics of sexual freedom and full disclosure, the sense of rightness derived from divulging or confessing says more about our fraught attitudes toward sexuality than it does about the higher ethics of transparency. The inclination to confess an extramarital affair, or demand the details of a spouse’s sexual conquests in an open relationship stems, in part, from a Judeo-Christian morality that views all sex as inherently dirty and suspect—and hence, in need of 24-hour surveillance and control. It also derives from an antediluvian belief that marriage means a kind of merging that renders the very notion of privacy anathema or moot. If the idea of a “private life” outside marriage sounds oxymoronic, it’s because we’ve so thoroughly romanticized the fusion of ourselves with our partners as a kind of testament to the depths of our intimacy. But a dark shadow hovers over this ideal that harkens back to colonial times: coverture laws. “Under coverture,” Stephanie Coontz, an eminent family historian at The Evergreen State College in Olympia, Wash., and author of [_Marriage, a History_](https://www.amazon.com/dp/014303667X/?tag=timecom-20), told me, “a man and a woman became one in the eyes of the law and he was the head of that one. Any property she had or income she earned was his.” A mere appendage of her husband, she didn’t exist as a discrete subject before the law. If she suffered injury at the hands of her spouse, including rape, she had no legal recourse because suing him would be akin to suing herself. It took two feminist revolutions before those laws were dismantled and women could emerge from matrimony their own subjects. And yet, contemporary conceptions of marital intimacy seem like a longing for that shackling oneness, where privacy is seen as an affront to spousal cohesion, and our partners are entitled to investigate and police us, as if we are children. But privacy is vital to our autonomy and self-growth. In fact, right-to-privacy arguments are at the heart of several Supreme Court decisions that have secured our freedom to self-determine: _Eisenstadt v. Baird_ safeguarded single people’s access to contraception; _Roe v. Wade_ legalized abortion, protecting women’s reproductive choice; and _Lawrence_ insured our freedom to forge intimate association with whomever we choose. As much as we may yearn for a womb-like oneness with our spouses, our well-established right to privacy doesn’t end in matrimony. Federal laws protect all of us from intrusive and surreptitious modes of spousal scrutiny. Jane Bambauer, a privacy law expert at The University of Arizona, summed it up via email: “The Federal Wiretap Act and Stored Communications Act protects everybody from unconsented interception or access to their personal communications. Also, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act protects people’s computers and online accounts from unauthorized access. There are a wide range of cases finding that spouses who spy on each other by logging into their email accounts or installing software to surveil their activities on a shared or personal computer are liable under these statutes.” The irony of women’s enduring allegiance to monogamy—and our misguided belief that we have the right to keep vigil at our spouse’s zipper—is that historically it was designed to harness women’s lusts, _not_ men’s. Katherine Franke, a distinguished professor at Columbia School of Law and author of [_Wedlocked: The Perils of Marriage Equality_](https://www.amazon.com/dp/1479815748/?tag=timecom-20), said in a recent telephone interview: “The rule of monogamy was really about controlling women’s sexuality because, of course, men were going off and having sex with other people, but they wanted to be sure their wives were producing their genetic offspring for inheritance purposes.” Coontz added that it wasn’t until the 1970s, at the height of Women’s Lib, that wives began holding their husbands to the same sexual expectation. “Back then, that was progress,” she said. Today, a new sexual ethos in marriage seems imminent—one, perhaps, that will allow us to fully individuate from our spouses in rooms of our own. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/"},"headline":"Do You Have a Right to Privacy in Your Marriage?","datePublished":"2016-08-08T14:58:34.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:04:26.650Z","description":"To modernize marriage, we must resist the urge to spy on our spouses","url":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/","keywords":["Culture"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Stephanie Fairyington","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/stephanie-fairyington/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/culture/","name":"Culture"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/","name":"Do You Have a Right to Privacy in Your Marriage?"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"A 100-Year-Old Sex Therapist on Having Good Sex, Then and Now","description":"A practicing sex therapist in New York City, Dr. Shirley Zussman has witnessed everything from the legalization of the contraceptive birth control pill to the AIDs epidemic in the 1980s to the rise of internet porn in the new millenium.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/uJFYIrvP/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2014-08-20T13:40:15.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/uJFYIrvP.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/","duration":"PT3M13S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4419321/privacy-in-marriage/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```