<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/" -->

---
title: Roger Ailes: Politically Incorrect Offices Are Bad For Women
description: Political correctness at Fox News seems like a catch-all term that includes opposition to equality and even basic civility
canonical: https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/
author: Jill Filipovic
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2016-07-21T22:37:48.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T23:26:09.280Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Why Politically Incorrect Workplaces Are Bad for Women
og:description: &#x27;Political correctness&#x27; at Fox News seems to include opposition to equality
og:url: https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 3008
og:image:height: 1692
og:image:alt: Roger Ailes
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Why Politically Incorrect Workplaces Are Bad for Women
twitter:description: &#x27;Political correctness&#x27; at Fox News seems to include opposition to equality
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Why Politically Incorrect Workplaces Are Bad for Women

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="835c54fc-89c9-4799-bbe1-d6963681f4c4" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=835c54fc-89c9-4799-bbe1-d6963681f4c4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=835c54fc-89c9-4799-bbe1-d6963681f4c4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=835c54fc-89c9-4799-bbe1-d6963681f4c4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Jill Filipovic](https://time.com/author/jill-filipovic/)


## Jill Filipovic


Jul 21, 2016 10:37 PM UTC

![Roger Ailes](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Roger Ailes poses at Fox News in New York, in Sept. 2006.

Roger Ailes poses at Fox News in New York, in Sept. 2006. Jim Cooper—AP

by 

[Jill Filipovic](https://time.com/author/jill-filipovic/)


## Jill Filipovic


Jul 21, 2016 10:37 PM UTC

Working for Roger Ailes at Fox News sounds a lot like being employed at _Mad Men_’s Draper Sterling, but with a doughier Dick Cheney playing the lead instead of Jon Hamm. According to a lawsuit filed by former Fox News correspondent Gretchen Carlson, Fox CEO Ailes was a serial sexual harasser, making sexualized comments about her, and eventually retaliating against her when she wouldn’t sleep with him. [Several other women ](http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2016/07/06/could-fox-news-chairman-roger-ailes-become-the-next-bill-cosby.html)have also said [Ailes harassed them](http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/six-more-women-allege-ailes-sexual-harassment.html), and anonymous sources have told New York Magazine’s Gabe Sherman that Fox’s star anchor [Megyn Kelly is among the women](http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/07/sources-kelly-said-ailes-sexually-harassed-her.html) Ailes has harassed. Ailes has denied the allegations, even as Fox showed him the exit.

The allegations are making headlines, but they shouldn’t come as a surprise. When an organization traffics in sexist politics, writes off pushes for equality as “political correctness,” and only puts women who fit a particular aesthetic on the air, it’s not hard to imagine there might be a toxic workplace culture behind the scenes.

The homogeneity of Fox’s on-air female correspondents is obvious enough for the women to earn the collective moniker “Fox Blondes.” This doesn’t mean the (yes, blonder than the general population) women of Fox are dumb or only got their jobs because of their looks, but the ubiquity of thin blondes on a network well populated with dumpy men does send the message that, for women and women only, fitting a narrow standard of conventional attractiveness is a job requirement. Some anchors have said the sexualization is more explicit—years before she filed this lawsuit, [Carlson told a radio audience that women were not allowed ](http://mediamatters.org/blog/2014/01/13/i-cant-see-her-legs-roger-ailes-rampant-sexism/197552)to wear pants on _Fox & Friends_. Fox women may be both bright and beautiful, but when beauty isn’t a requirement for male journalists, it’s easy to see why Carlson would conclude, as she asserted in her suit, that she was often treated as “a blond female prop.”


Positioning female journalists as things to be admired rather than professionals evaluated on merit alone has consequences—including allowing harassment to thrive. Studies have shown that when [men are exposed to television clips](https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259356789%5FObjectifying%5FMedia%5FTheir%5FEffect%5Fon%5FGender%5FRole%5FNorms%5Fand%5FSexual%5FHarassment%5Fof%5FWomen) in which women are objectified, they are more likely to engage in sexual harassment. Should it be surprising that men who run networks feeding off of objectification may not treat their female employees with total respect?

Fox, with its conservative political bent, could be particularly predisposed to sheltering men who sexually harass women. It often recedes into crass [misogyny](http://www.nationalmemo.com/4-worst-examples-of-fox-news-misogyny/): A female pilot who dropped bombs on ISIS was “boobs on the ground,” and a female Fox News contributor was told to “Know your role and shut your mouth” on air by a guest whose disrespect was met by an invitation back on the show. The network has segments with titles like “[The War on Men](http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013/02/05/to-be-happy-must-admit-women-and-men-arent-equal.html)” and the talent routinely laments the decline of traditional gender roles. Researchers have [long noted](http://vpva.rutgers.edu/sexual-violence/why-does-sexual-violence-occur/) that sexual assailants often show an adherence to traditional gender roles; while Ailes isn’t accused of assault, sexual harassment falls on the same continuum of behaviors that reflect a man’s view of women as less-than-human sexual objects. Conservative views on gender, in other words, are breeding grounds for bad behavior toward women—and conservative views on gender are part of the Fox ethos.


That same conservatism can make it harder for victims of harassment to come forward. The network says “political correctness” is to blame for everything from [terrorism](http://mediamatters.org/video/2016/06/12/fox-guest-blames-obama-clinton-and-political-correctness-orlando-shooting/210877) to [sexual assault](http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/01/06/dana-loesch-slams-political-correctness-following-mass-sexual-assault-cologne-germany). Political correctness, it seems, is a catch-all term that includes opposition to equality and even basic civility; an entrenched culture of hostility toward that kind of simple decency is any HR department’s nightmare. It also seems to be the case at Fox, where branding something “PC” is a quick way to invalidate it. There are few things more PC than suggesting your boss shouldn’t get to ogle your legs, which would presumably make it difficult for women at Fox to come forward with harassment allegations.

Sexual harassment, of course, is not just a conservative problem. But antagonism to women’s equality, a “boys will be boys” mentality and opposition to PC culture create conditions for harassment to flourish—and make reporting it especially difficult. Republican nominee Donald Trump, who often [rails](http://insider.foxnews.com/2016/03/11/donald-trump-doubles-down-islam-hates-us-statement) against political correctness, is regularly featured on Fox News; network contributors also [defend](http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2016/05/16/donald-trump-likes-women-this-is-news-to-new-york-times.html) Trump’s sexism as politically incorrect rather than pathological. But when Trump complains about political correctness and says he wants to Make America Great Again, he harkens back to a _Mad Men_ era when men had freer rein to treat women like sexual playthings.


This is the pervasive view at the Fox family table: That America was better off when, to paraphrase one Fox contributor, women knew their roles and shut their mouths. The predominant feminist view—and one increasingly reflected in the law – is that women should be judged by their skills in the workplace, not by their sex appeal, and that their colleagues should treat them as peers and not pets. That, it seems, may simply be too politically correct for Ailes.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/"},"headline":"Why Politically Incorrect Workplaces Are Bad for Women","datePublished":"2016-07-21T22:37:48.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T23:26:09.280Z","description":"'Political correctness' at Fox News seems to include opposition to equality","url":"https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/","keywords":["Media"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jill Filipovic","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jill-filipovic/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte57c4b5fccdf4cd0/69889ea33c1639f01945e240/roger-ailes2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Roger Ailes","caption":"Roger Ailes","creditText":"Jim Cooper—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/media/","name":"Media"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4416881/roger-ailes-fox-news-harassment/","name":"Why Politically Incorrect Workplaces Are Bad for Women"}}]}]
```

