--- title: GOP Platform Is Indefensibly Anti-LGBT and Offensive description: For a gay conservative, the challenge of defending my party grew steeper than ever with this new platform. canonical: https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/ author: James Richardson article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-07-13T20:02:19.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T23:14:05.718Z article:section: Ideas og:title: As a Gay Republican, I Cannot Defend the GOP Platform og:description: It’s completely out of touch with reality, not to mention offensive og:url: https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: As a Gay Republican, I Cannot Defend the GOP Platform twitter:description: It’s completely out of touch with reality, not to mention offensive twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # As a Gay Republican, I Cannot Defend the GOP Platform > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d28068e-a3e8-4397-bda4-4a5e7b1c9650&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d28068e-a3e8-4397-bda4-4a5e7b1c9650&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=8d28068e-a3e8-4397-bda4-4a5e7b1c9650&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [James Richardson](https://time.com/author/james-richardson/) ## James Richardson Jul 13, 2016 8:02 PM UTC by [James Richardson](https://time.com/author/james-richardson/) ## James Richardson Jul 13, 2016 8:02 PM UTC To call the astringent platform proposed this week by the Republican National Committee obtusely retrograde would be unfair to geocentrics, alchemists and phrenologists. It designates [pornography](http://time.com/4401600/gop-platform-contemplates-anti-porn-provision-embrace-of-conversion-therapy/) a “public health crisis,” because masturbation is a transcendent threat to American wellness that obviously must be addressed. It supports so-called [sexual conversion therapy](http://time.com/4401600/gop-platform-contemplates-anti-porn-provision-embrace-of-conversion-therapy/) for minors, even as every mainstream mental health and medical organization [discredited the repugnant practice](http://psc.dss.ucdavis.edu/rainbow/html/facts%5Fchanging.html) decades earlier. It marks children reared in a “[traditional two-parent household](http://time.com/4402986/republican-platform-gay-rights-lgbt/)” as inherently superior to those reared outside the _Leave It to Beaver_ dynamic, even as reputable science demonstrates otherwise. The committee separately [rejected a positively mild resolution](http://time.com/4405261/gay-republicans-convention-rachel-hoff-platform/?xid=homepage) designed only to encourage dialogue on the virtue of same-sex marriage, even a year after the United States Supreme Court affirmed the fundamental right of every American to wed the person of their choosing. For a gay conservative—one who [served as a spokesman for the Republican National Committee](https://www.washingtonpost.com/posteverything/wp/2014/09/04/im-a-senior-gop-spokesman-and-im-gay-let-me-get-married/), no less—the challenge of defending my party grew steeper than ever with this new platform. It would be easier to defend the belief that earth is the center of the universe than some of the nonsense installed as official party dogma for the next four years. And yet there remains cause for hope. That a resolution to acknowledge the diversity of sincerely-held opinions on marriage was even offered is cause for hope. That it garnered the support of [one-fourth of the panel](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/us/politics/rachel-hoff-gop-issues.html?%5Fr=0), when only three years earlier the same group unanimously passed expressly anti-gay provisions, is cause for hope. That it would be offered by the first [openly-gay member of the platform committee](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/12/us/politics/rachel-hoff-gop-issues.html?%5Fr=0) is cause for hope. Couched in a historical perspective, these are genuine indications of progress. Now, they’re not dramatic indications, but they represent positive movement nonetheless: recall that [homophobia was a hallmark](http://www.slate.com/articles/news%5Fand%5Fpolitics/politics/2010/09/fussy%5Fhysterical%5Fwinesipping%5Fpols.html) of the party’s get-out-the-vote campaign at the turn of the century. The hyper-partisans tasked with authoring the party’s platform are not representative of the broader party, neither politically nor demographically. These are the type who, a decade after the release of the first iPhone, still carry two Blackberry phones—one personal, one professional. They’re the type to set their browser to open to conservative Drudge Report. They’re the type to casually reference political journalists Mike Allen and Nate Silver in ordinary dinner conversation. Said another way, they’re not normal Americans. Normal Americans don’t believe an innocent child should be emotionally tortured until they renounce something they lack the power to change. Normal Americans don’t believe an adult should categorically be denied access to a right that the nation’s highest court has ruled now 15 times is fundamental to the pursuit of happiness. Normal Americans don’t agree with this platform: support for the freedom to marry, even among self-described Republicans, is at its highest point in history—[61% as of May](http://www.gallup.com/poll/117328/marriage.aspx), according to Gallup—and the historical trend suggests that margin will only increase. When Republicans last lost the White House in 2012, RNC Chairman Reince Priebus [commissioned a post-election autopsy report](http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2013/03/what-you-need-to-read-in-the-rnc-election-autopsy-report/274112/) to identify those structural and policy hurdles that contributed to party’s second consecutive defeat. The report, meticulously telegraphed by a bruised party leadership to demonstrate lessons learned and an awareness of shifting political tides, [delivered predictable results](https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/apr/12/rnc-gay-marriage-debate-priebus): don’t be so white, don’t be so old, don’t be so straight. Specifically it appraised the generational divide on social issues that sometimes serves as a barricade to millennial and minority engagement. Not only does this platform flout the autopsy’s recommendation to adjust how the party manages cultural wedges, but it also expressly denies the diversity of opinion on gay issues within the party. But the secret’s out thanks to this episode: there are gay Republicans, and there are straight Republicans who, like the Supreme Court, believe gay men and women should be afforded the full rights and burdens of citizenship like all other Americans. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/"},"headline":"As a Gay Republican, I Cannot Defend the GOP Platform","datePublished":"2016-07-13T20:02:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T23:14:05.718Z","description":"But at least there’s some hope for change","url":"https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/","keywords":["politics","GOP"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"James Richardson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/james-richardson/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4405018/gop-platform-lgbt-issues/","name":"As a Gay Republican, I Cannot Defend the GOP Platform"}}]}] ```