--- title: Afghanistan Troop Pullout Slowed by President Obama description: President Obama will hand over to the next commander in chief a 50% bigger U.S. force in Afghanistan there than he had planned. canonical: https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-07-06T16:35:41.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T23:04:52.489Z article:section: Politics og:title: Obama Slows Down U.S. Troop Pullout from Afghanistan og:description: A 50% bigger U.S. force than planned. og:url: https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e788fc427908ebf/69889ad70b72e371856ea147/gettyimages-5451943361.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: President Obama Makes Statement On Afghanistan At White House og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Obama Slows Down U.S. Troop Pullout from Afghanistan twitter:description: A 50% bigger U.S. force than planned. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e788fc427908ebf/69889ad70b72e371856ea147/gettyimages-5451943361.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Obama Slows Down U.S. Troop Pullout from Afghanistan > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c23846ef-a9a5-46eb-9f34-be1c28dac839&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c23846ef-a9a5-46eb-9f34-be1c28dac839&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c23846ef-a9a5-46eb-9f34-be1c28dac839&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jul 6, 2016 4:35 PM UTC  President Obama, flanked by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Marine General Joseph Dunford, announces he is slowing the pullout of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. President Obama, flanked by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Marine General Joseph Dunford, announces he is slowing the pullout of U.S. troops from Afghanistan. Win McNamee / Getty Images by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jul 6, 2016 4:35 PM UTC President Obama, prolonging the nation’s now 15-year presence in Afghanistan, declared Tuesday that he will hand over to the next commander in chief a 50% bigger U.S. force there than he had planned. Flanked by Defense Secretary Ashton Carter and Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Obama said he would leave 8,400 troops in Afghanistan at year’s end, down from his prior target of 5,500\. There are now about 9,800 U.S. troops in Afghanistan. It marked the latest retreat from his original goal of bringing the wars he inherited from President George W. Bush to an end on his watch. The vacuum triggered by the U.S. pullout from Iraq in 2011 helped lead to the rise of ISIS, which has forced Obama to order nearly 5,000 troops back into the country. He was under pressure from U.S. military leaders to avoid making the same mistake in Afghanistan. “We are no longer engaged in a major ground war in Afghanistan,” Obama said, as he acknowledged the 38 U.S. military and civilian deaths there over the past 18 months. A total of 2,382 Americans troops have been killed in Afghanistan since 2001\. The U.S. troop presence in Afghanistan didn’t top 40,000 under Bush, who diverted military resources to the Iraq war beginning in 2003\. But as the Iraq war wound down, Obama increased the number of U.S. troops in Afghanistan to a peak of nearly 100,000 between 2010 and 2012. Pentagon officials said the slowdown is needed to keep a resurgent Taliban from taking more Afghan territory from the U.S.-backed central government in Kabul. The insurgency currently [occupies](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2015/09/29/world/asia/afghanistan-taliban-maps.html?%5Fr=0) at least 20% of the country. Pentagon pessimists see the decision as only pushing Afghanistan’s current instability into the next Administration, but unlikely to result in any substantial change on the ground. The more hopeful among them believe the continued training that the increased U.S. troops will provide could turn the tide against the Taliban. Obama spoke optimistically Wednesday. “To their credit and in the face of a continued Taliban insurgency and terrorist networks, Afghan forces remain in control of all the major population centers, provincial capitals, major transit routes and most district centers,” he said. “Afghan forces have beaten back attacks and they’ve pushed the Taliban out of some areas.” But others have a grimmer view of what is happening in Afghanistan. “Over the last six months, both \[Afghan\] and insurgent casualties have increased, continuing their upward trend from the previous reporting period,” the Defense Department said last month it its congressionally mandated semi-annual progress [report](http://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/Enhancing%5FSecurity%5Fand%5FStability%5Fin%5FAfghanistan-June%5F2016.pdf). “Increased insurgent fighting in urban areas has also contributed to record-high civilian casualties, primarily caused by insurgent and extremist groups.” Some outsiders concur. Afghanistan’s National Security Forces are “unprepared to counter the Taliban militants’ summer campaign,” the independent Institute for the Study of War think tank [said](http://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/afghanistan-partial-threat-assessment-april-12-2016) in April. “Taliban militants seek to degrade the ANSF, discourage foreign presence, and demonstrate the weakness of the unity government … They will achieve these objectives through increased insider attacks, assassination campaigns, and attacks against Western and diplomatic targets in Kabul City and beyond. Taliban militants also seek to gain control of additional territory, for which they have already set conditions over the winter.” Then there are the stray clues that things are not going well. Despite a U.S. investment of $65 billion in the Afghan military, U.S. Special Operations Command, announced three contracts Wednesday for private-security forces to defend their outposts in [Kabul](https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=5245b562e23790afbddb46ceb8b1573a&tab=core&%5Fcview=0) (the country’s most-populated city), [Kandahar](https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=0aa4ea02af312951b19723a5a6285810&tab=core&%5Fcview=0) (2nd most-populated) and [Mazar-e-Sharif](https://www.fbo.gov/index?s=opportunity&mode=form&id=27f36bf633640e1bb35418e0ea1e6945&tab=core&%5Fcview=0) (4th most-populated). The Pentagon watchdog for Afghanistan released a [letter](https://www.sigar.mil/pdf/special%20projects/SIGAR-16-40-SP.pdf) Wednesday highlighting problems with health clinics set up by the U.S. inside the country. A bipartisan group of senators asked Obama in May to announce his troop-level decision before the NATO summit slated later this week in Warsaw. “We urge you to announce any changes to our current planned force levels ahead of the relevant NATO conferences, giving the strongest consideration to the assessment of your military commanders and to conditions on the ground,” the 10 lawmakers [said](https://time.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/5-25-16-afghan-letter-to-potus.pdf) in a May letter. One of those signers, Senator John McCain, R-Ariz., chairman of the armed services committee, said he welcomed Obama’s decision, as far as it went. “While I believe conditions on the ground warranted retaining the current force level, the decision to retain 8,400 U.S. troops in Afghanistan into next year is certainly preferable to cutting those forces by nearly half,” he said after Obama’s announcement. “That said, when the President himself describes the security situation in Afghanistan as ‘precarious,’ it is difficult to discern any strategic rationale for withdrawing 1,400 U.S. troops by the end of the year.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/"},"headline":"Obama Slows Down U.S. Troop Pullout from Afghanistan","datePublished":"2016-07-06T16:35:41.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T23:04:52.489Z","description":"Will drop to 8,400 instead of 5,500 by year's end","url":"https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/","keywords":["Military","Barack Obama","Afghanistan"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e788fc427908ebf/69889ad70b72e371856ea147/gettyimages-5451943361.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4e788fc427908ebf/69889ad70b72e371856ea147/gettyimages-5451943361.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"President Obama Makes Statement On Afghanistan At White House","caption":"President Obama Makes Statement On Afghanistan At White House","creditText":"Win McNamee / Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4394955/afghanistan-barack-obama-troops-pullout/","name":"Obama Slows Down U.S. Troop Pullout from Afghanistan"}}]}] ```