--- title: Supreme Court Abortion Ruling: Northup on Women's Rights description: It’s a resounding victory recognizing robust constitutional protections of women’s ability to control their reproductive lives canonical: https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/ author: Nancy Northup article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-27T21:08:04.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T22:53:13.191Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Women's Rights Were 'On the Brink' Before SCOTUS Abortion Ruling og:description: Louisiana will likely be the next battleground in this fight og:url: https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5713d2c7993849c4/698899a3cd1bbae801701441/scotus2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4704 og:image:height: 2646 og:image:alt: Abortion rights activists cheer after the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas law placing restrictions on abortion clinics, outside of the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 . og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Women's Rights Were 'On the Brink' Before SCOTUS Abortion Ruling twitter:description: Louisiana will likely be the next battleground in this fight twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5713d2c7993849c4/698899a3cd1bbae801701441/scotus2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Nancy Northup: Women's Rights Were 'On the Brink' > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8bc5143-6418-4450-8668-b26d438ea9e1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8bc5143-6418-4450-8668-b26d438ea9e1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a8bc5143-6418-4450-8668-b26d438ea9e1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a8bc5143-6418-4450-8668-b26d438ea9e1&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Nancy Northup](https://time.com/author/nancy-northup/) ## Nancy Northup Jun 27, 2016 9:08 PM UTC  Abortion rights activists cheer after the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas law placing restrictions on abortion clinics, outside of the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 . Abortion rights activists cheer after the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas law placing restrictions on abortion clinics, outside of the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 . Mandel Ngan—AFP/Getty Images by [Nancy Northup](https://time.com/author/nancy-northup/) ## Nancy Northup Jun 27, 2016 9:08 PM UTC Monday’s historic decision in _Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt_ rescued from the brink women’s constitutional right to obtain a safe and legal abortion. It’s a resounding victory and reaffirmation of more than 40 years of settled law recognizing robust constitutional protections of women’s ability to control their reproductive lives, and the dignity and personal liberty at stake in those decisions. We were brought to the brink because Texas politicians used deceptive means to deny women what the Constitution protects. In 2013 Texas enacted HB2, a sweeping law packed with targeted attacks singling out abortion clinics for crippling and unjustified requirements, such as overhauling their facilities to become mini-hospitals. HB2 masquerades as a safety regulation, but its illicit purpose is simple and clear: to shut down the state’s abortion clinics. And that is exactly what it has done. By the time the Supreme Court stepped in last year to block the law’s enforcement while the justices considered the case, HB2 had already devastated abortion services in the state, shuttering more than half of the 40-plus clinics that once served Texas women. Only [19 clinics](https://www.texastribune.org/2016/03/02/supreme-court-hear-arguments-texas-abortion-law/) remained open, in a state with nearly 27 million people. Women faced delays or the impossibility of getting an appointment. Many were hundreds of miles from the nearest clinic. Unable to afford the costs of travel, childcare and time off from work, HB2 functioned as a de facto ban on abortion for many women with limited financial means. As the Supreme Court [made clear](http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/15pdf/15-274%5Fp8k0.pdf): “The challenged provisions of HB2 close most of the abortion facilities in Texas and place added stress on those facilities able to remain open. They vastly increase the obstacles confronting women seeking abortions in Texas without providing any benefit to women’s health capable of withstanding any meaningful scrutiny. The provisions are unconstitutional on their face.” What happens next? As a result of the decision, the Texas clinics we have fought alongside for the last three years will continue to serve their patients, and new clinics may soon open their doors in underserved areas so that the right to abortion in Texas can exist in fact, not just in law books. Without question, Monday’s decision represents a sharp change in the prevailing winds after years of unrelenting legislative assaults on women’s rights across the country. In the last five years, lawmakers have enacted about 300 restrictions on legal abortion. Again and again, courts have had to step in to block implementation of these unconstitutional laws. It’s like a never-ending game of Whack-a-Mole: State legislatures repeatedly enact abortion restrictions. Courts block them. Politicians go back to legislative playbooks crafted by activist organizations opposed to safe and legal abortion under any circumstances—and a whole new set of insidious laws gets introduced the next year. We have sued Oklahoma eight times in the last five years, and secured seven injunctions against their anti-abortion attacks. Louisiana will likely be the next battleground in this fight. The state already faces a challenge to a clinic shutdown law similar to one of the Texas provisions, and its legislature doubled down this year, passing seven additional restrictions. Monday’s decision puts a fine point on why those restrictions cannot stand. As a lawyer, it’s gratifying to win and see justice done. But women should not have to run to court again and again to defend their rights—or to get the safe, legal, essential reproductive health care that the U.S. Constitution protects. [One in three](http://www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/may/23/naral-pro-choice-america/flawed-naral-virginia-claim-1-3-women-will-have-ab/) women in America will make the decision to end a pregnancy. Never again should we have to wait to see whether the Supreme Court will pull us back from the brink of losing our rights. _Whole Women’s Health_ makes clear that it’s long past time for responsible lawmakers to uphold the Constitution they have sworn to protect and respect the dignity, health and autonomy of the women they were elected to serve. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/"},"headline":"Nancy Northup: Women's Rights Were 'On the Brink'","datePublished":"2016-06-27T21:08:04.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T22:53:13.191Z","description":"'Louisiana will likely be the next battleground in this fight'","url":"https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/","keywords":["abortion","Supreme Court"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5713d2c7993849c4/698899a3cd1bbae801701441/scotus2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Nancy Northup","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/nancy-northup/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt5713d2c7993849c4/698899a3cd1bbae801701441/scotus2.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Abortion rights activists cheer after the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas law placing restrictions on abortion clinics, outside of the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 .","caption":"Abortion rights activists cheer after the US Supreme Court struck down a Texas law placing restrictions on abortion clinics, outside of the Supreme Court on June 27, 2016 .","creditText":"Mandel Ngan—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/abortion/","name":"abortion"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4384657/supreme-court-abortion-nancy-northup/","name":"Nancy Northup: Women's Rights Were 'On the Brink'"}}]}] ```