--- title: Benghazi Report Shows Investigation Is Still a Circus description: The 2012 attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi continued its afterlife as a political sideshow Monday canonical: https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-27T21:13:54.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T22:53:12.290Z article:section: Politics og:title: The Benghazi Circus Is Still In Town og:description: Democrats pre-empt GOP report with one of their own og:url: https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Benghazi Circus Is Still In Town twitter:description: Democrats pre-empt GOP report with one of their own twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Benghazi Circus Is Still In Town > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=eca71902-4776-4ff8-91c9-b298a0923354&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=eca71902-4776-4ff8-91c9-b298a0923354&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=eca71902-4776-4ff8-91c9-b298a0923354&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=eca71902-4776-4ff8-91c9-b298a0923354&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 27, 2016 9:13 PM UTC by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 27, 2016 9:13 PM UTC The 2012 attack that killed four Americans in Benghazi continued its afterlife as a political sideshow Monday, as congressional Democrats pre-empted their Republican counterparts by issuing a report concluding — no surprise here — that the deaths were a tragedy but not a cover-up. Coming, as it did, from the Democratic half the panel, it won’t calm the controversy over what happened in that Libyan city on Sept. 11, 2012\. Nor will it keep Republicans from using it as a club against the then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, now the all-but-certain Democratic nominee for President, despite several official investigations that have cleared her of wrongdoing in the matter. For more than two years, a special House committee has studied the mob attack that killed the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, along with fellow Americans Glen Doherty, Sean Smith and Tyrone Woods. Republicans, led by Rep. Trey Gowdy of South Carolina, have long argued that the Obama Administration and Clinton fumbled the U.S. response to the attacks, and then misled the nation about what happened to minimize their culpability. The 344-page Democratic report, along with a similar [study](http://benghazicommittee.com/committee-no-10-the-true-story-of-the-house-select-committee-on-benghazi/) also released Monday by Clinton’s political supporters, dismisses such charges. While the congressional inquiry [acknowledges](http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/sites/democrats.benghazi.house.gov/files/documents/Report%5Fof%5Fthe%5FBenghazi%5FSelect%5FCommittee%5FDemocratic%5FMembers-Honoring%5FCourage%5FImproving%5FSecurity%5Fand%5FFighting%5Fthe%5FExploitation%5Fof%5Fa%5FTragedy.pdf) State Department security in Benghazi was “woefully inadequate,” it says there was nothing the Pentagon could have done to save the Americans’ lives. The panel said it could find no evidence that Clinton personally denied requests for additional security in Benghazi. And the Obama Administration’s initial claims that the attack was spontaneously sparked by an anti-Muslim video — rather than a carefully planned attack on the 11th anniversary of 9/11 it turned out to be — were not “intentionally misleading,” the Democratic report found. Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, the senior Democrat on the panel, said his party had to issue its own findings into what happened because the GOP was unwilling to produce a bipartisan report that would include Democrats’ views on what transpired. Much of the report attacks the GOP’s “grave abuses” during the inquiry. Republicans released their own final [report](http://benghazi.house.gov/NewInfo) Tuesday. Matt Wolking, spokesman for the GOP members of the panel, said the Democrats’ report puts their “obsession with the former secretary of state…on full display,” mentioning her name 334 times. The panel’s “dishonest Democrats” refused to join their Republican colleagues’ “serious, fact-centered investigation,” he added. “Everyone can ignore their rehashed, partisan talking points defending their endorsed candidate for President.” The edited [transcripts](http://democrats-benghazi.house.gov/work/interview-transcripts) of U.S. military officials involved in Benghazi and its aftermath released by the Democrats read, in many passages, more like a prosecution than an inquiry. “When you generate an aircraft there’s a lot to it,” Air Force General Philip Breedlove told the panel in an April 7 [session](http://askedandanswered-democrats.benghazi.house.gov/transcripts/2016%5F04%5F07%5FSCB%5FINTERVIEW%5FGeneral%5FPhilip%5FBreedlove.pdf) after being drilled about the lack of airpower available to help in Benghazi. “You don’t just walk up and turn the keys and take off,” said Breedlove, who spent more than 3,500 hours flying F-16s and other warplanes. When pressed on the possibility of rescuing the imperiled Americans, Breedlove relied on the intractables of time and distance. “The physics of the timeline, of tasking, plus generation of aircraft, plus physically flying, et cetera, et cetera, they would not have changed anything to do, unfortunately, with the ambassador or others,” he said. Breedlove commanded the U.S. Air Force in Europe when the Benghazi attack took place; he recently retired as NATO’s top military commander. The warring reports are the latest evidence — if any were needed — that Congress is incapable of weighing evidence and declaring, based on that evidence, what it believes took place. Instead, each side embraced a view shortly after the event, and has done everything it could to discredit the other side. An honest reading of the evidence tilts more the Democrats’ way. In some ways, the Benghazi imbroglio carries echoes of the [commission](https://www.archives.gov/research/jfk/warren-commission-report/) led by Chief Justice Earl Warren that judged Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone when he killed President Kennedy on Nov. 22, 1963\. Much of the nation found that conclusion — and Oswald’s killing two days later inside the Dallas police station by nightclub owner Jack Ruby — unsatisfying. It triggered theories involving a “second gunman” on the “grassy knoll” that have persisted for more than a half-century. But the seven members of the Warren commission took only 10 months — less than half the time of the Benghazi panel — to come to their conclusion. And, unlike the Benghazi panel, at least they were unanimous. _— With additional reporting by Philip Elliott_ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/"},"headline":"The Benghazi Circus Is Still In Town","datePublished":"2016-06-27T21:13:54.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T22:53:12.290Z","description":"Democrats pre-empt GOP report with one of their own","url":"https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/","keywords":["Benghazi"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/benghazi/","name":"Benghazi"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4384584/benghazi-report-hillary-clinton-congress-libya/","name":"The Benghazi Circus Is Still In Town"}}]}] ```