--- title: Democratic National Committee: Who Hacked Them? description: In the contorted media environment of an election year, unraveling this tangle of finger-pointing could have serious implications. canonical: https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/ author: Haley Sweetland Edwards article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-17T15:58:55.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:46:02.683Z article:section: Politics og:title: Why It Matters Who Hacked the Democratic National Committee og:description: Their motives would tell us what's next. og:url: https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc164e3e3e8552912/698898590b72e3a5306e9d9a/democratic-national-committee.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: Democratic National Committee Vice Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) (2nd L) delivers remarks while responding to the House Republican's unveiling of their "Pledge to America" with (L-R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) a og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why It Matters Who Hacked the Democratic National Committee twitter:description: Their motives would tell us what's next. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc164e3e3e8552912/698898590b72e3a5306e9d9a/democratic-national-committee.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why It Matters Who Hacked the Democratic National Committee > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=a392d38b-e2d8-4b05-a4ed-0c38addb7e57&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 85,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 37.0% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=a392d38b-e2d8-4b05-a4ed-0c38addb7e57&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=a392d38b-e2d8-4b05-a4ed-0c38addb7e57&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. It reaches 85,000 subscribers with a 37.0% open rate as of August 2026. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters.  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jun 17, 2016 3:58 PM UTC  Democratic National Committee Vice Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) (2nd L) delivers remarks while responding to the House Republican's unveiling of their "Pledge to America" with (L-R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) and Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) outside of the Democratic National Committee headquarters September 23, 2010 in Washington, DC. Democratic National Committee Vice Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) (2nd L) delivers remarks while responding to the House Republican's unveiling of their "Pledge to America" with (L-R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) and Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) outside of the Democratic National Committee headquarters September 23, 2010 in Washington, DC.Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images  by [Haley Sweetland Edwards](https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/)  ## Haley Sweetland Edwards Jun 17, 2016 3:58 PM UTC A cyber security firm hired by the Democratic National Committee announced on Monday that two groups affiliated with Russian intelligence were responsible for infiltrating the Democrats’ network and stealing a ream of confidential election-related information. Two days later, a hacker claiming to be acting as [a lone wolf,](https://www.rawstory.com/2016/06/lone-hacker-says-theyre-behind-cyber-attack-dnc-blamed-on-russia/) who said he was unaffiliated with the Russians and [called himself “Guccifer 2.0,”](https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/) leaked what appeared to be a 200-page document consisting of largely unsurprising opposition research on Donald Trump. The leak called into question who, exactly, had been responsible for the hack on the Democratic headquarters. If it was really the Russians, as the DNC’s cyber security firm, CrowdStrike, claimed, who was this Guccifer 2.0 figure? (The name harkens back to [an actual Romanian lone wolf](http://swampland.time.com/2013/02/08/the-lesson-of-the-bush-family-email-hack-be-worried/) who hacked the Bush family, among others, and is now in a jail in Virginia.) Had the DNC’s cyber team misattributed the breach to the wrong group? Had it failed to detect a different breach that had successfully stolen more confidential information? Then, on Thursday, a [flurry of articles](http://motherboard.vice.com/read/guccifer-20-is-likely-a-russian-government-attempt-to-cover-up-their-own-hack) in the tech media threw a curve ball: Several cyber security experts suggested that perhaps Guccifer 2.0 was only _claiming_ to be acting independently, in an elaborate effort to cast doubt on CrowdStrike’s assertion that the Russians had been behind the breach. Meanwhile, to add further to the fog of cyberwarfare, Republican presumptive nominee Donald Trump raised the possibility on Wednesday that the Democrats had pretended to hack their own network in an effort to leak negative stories on Trump to the press. “Maybe they weren’t hacked; maybe they just want to get it out there,” Trump mused in an interview with Greta Van Susteren on Fox News. (That seems unlikely as the alleged oppo research on Trump released so far was mostly based on previously published articles voters could already find themselves on Google. The document featured chapters like “Trump has no core” and “Trump is a liar.”) In the shrill and contorted media environment of an election year, unraveling this tangle of finger-pointing could have serious political implications. If the hackers do indeed turn out to be Russian, it’s confirmation that a powerful foreign state is seeking to influence, or at least spy on, domestic U.S. politics. If the hackers turned out to be politically-motivated domestic actors, American voters—not to mention the Clinton and Trump campaigns—could expect more potentially unsavory documents to surface before Election Day. For example, in addition to claiming responsibility for the DNC hack, the Guccifer 2.0 hacker also bragged about having access to documents from presumptive Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s State Department computer and to Democratic donors’ financial information. If those claims are true—and huge emphasis on that “if”—it could be a game-changer in an already-historical strange election year. Alternatively, if the hackers turn out to be random ne’er–do–wells out for a thrill, the immediately implications on U.S. electoral politics might be more limited, but raise disturbing questions about the security of all political communications. As of now, the question of who, exactly, is behind the DNC hack, as well as possibly related hacks on Republican political groups, and both Hillary Clinton and Trump’s networks, remains a question mark. What top U.S. technologists know for sure is that at least two groups of hackers were willing to take a major risk—and make a substantial investment—to access the DNC’s network. Who is behind the attacks remains unclear—and, unfortunately, a satisfying answer isn’t likely to come any time soon. “Attribution is incredibly difficult—I wouldn’t say impossible, but it’s very difficult,” Nathaniel Gleicher, the head of cybersecurity strategy at Illumio, told TIME. “Investigations like this do not wrap up quickly and often do not wrap up at all because it’s very hard to tell where they came from.” Amit Yoran, the president of the cybersecurity firm RSA was also noncommittal on whether there’d ever be a smoking gun. “I think attribution is one of those topics that people like to rush to because it makes for sexier reporting—you want to make a meaningful story for non-technologists,” he told TIME. “Saying you know who was responsible makes for a very compelling story. But it’s also very hard to do well in the cyber domain, especially over a short period of time with a sophisticated actor.” Gleicher, who served as director for cybersecurity policy on the National Security Council at the White House, added that this particular case might be especially tricky since the perpetrators were apparently hiding in the DNC’s system for a long time. CrowdStrike, the cyber security firm hired by the DNC, reported that at least one of two groups of hackers that breached the DNC’s network had been in the system since last summer. “Because they were in there so long, it’s going to be very hard to unwind everything, to track back to reality,” Gleicher said. Reg Harnish, the CEO of GreyCastle Security, a New York-based cybersecurity company, says he’s doubtful that Crowdstrike’s investigation—and its determination that the Russians are to blame—is the “end of the story.” “I’ve been personally involved in hundreds of these investigations, and you just don’t end up in the same place where you began,” he told TIME. This particular case, he said, is complicated by “all the politicking going on.” “You have people being politically correct or outright lying,” Harnish added. “I think there’s a lot of misinformation out there right now.” Scott Borg, the head of the U.S. Cyber Consequences Unit, echoed the skepticism. “Our best guess is that the second (and apparently less skillful) of the two intruders was not Russian intelligence,” he [told](http://www.politico.com/tipsheets/morning-cybersecurity) Politico on Thursday. “We are also uncertain about the first group,” he added. CrowdStrike said in a blog post Monday that there were two distinct breaches of the DNC’s network. One group of hackers, which CrowdStrike called Cozy Bear, was in the network since summer 2015, and largely monitoring the DNC’s email and chat communications. The other, which the firm named Fancy Bear, triggered alarm bells when it broke into the network in late April, targeting opposition research files on Trump, CrowdStrike said. In a statement sent to TIME, CrowdStrike defended its assessment that the DNC had been breached by hackers affiliated with the Russian intelligence community. “CrowdStrike stands fully by its analysis and findings identifying two separate Russian intelligence-affiliated adversaries present in the DNC network in May 2016,” the statement said. It then acknowledged Guccifer 2.0’s claims to have accessed the DNC’s network and said it was “exploring the documents’ authenticity and origin.” “Regardless, these claims do nothing to lessen our findings relating to the Russian government’s involvement,” the CrowdStrike statement said. The DNC would not reply to several emails and voicemails from TIME asking whether the organization had notified the Federal Bureau of Investigation or another federal law enforcement agency. The FBI would neither confirm or deny that it was investigating the breach. A spokeswoman at CrowdStrike said she had not heard of the firm collaborating with any federal investigation. “It would surprise me if they did not get international law enforcement or the intelligence community involved with this case,” Yoran said. “It’s dealing with potentially extremely sensitive information that would have a great impact on U.S. policy.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/"},"headline":"Why It Matters Who Hacked the Democratic National Committee","datePublished":"2016-06-17T15:58:55.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:46:02.683Z","description":"In the contorted media environment of an election year, unraveling this tangle of finger-pointing could have serious implications.","url":"https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/","keywords":["Cyber Attacks","democrats","2016 Election","Donald Trump"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc164e3e3e8552912/698898590b72e3a5306e9d9a/democratic-national-committee.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Haley Sweetland Edwards","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/haley-sweetland-edwards/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc164e3e3e8552912/698898590b72e3a5306e9d9a/democratic-national-committee.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Democratic National Committee Vice Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) (2nd L) delivers remarks while responding to the House Republican's unveiling of their \"Pledge to America\" with (L-R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) a","caption":"Democratic National Committee Vice Chairwoman Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-FL) (2nd L) delivers remarks while responding to the House Republican's unveiling of their \"Pledge to America\" with (L-R) Rep. Robert Andrews (D-NJ), Rep. Jared Polis (D-CO) a","creditText":"Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/cyber-attacks/","name":"Cyber Attacks"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4372161/democratic-national-committee-hackers/","name":"Why It Matters Who Hacked the Democratic National Committee"}}]}] ```