--- title: Donald Trump Military: What Does Military Think of Him? description: There is private concern inside the U.S. armed forces about Trump’s fitness for command, but few will say so on the record. canonical: https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/ author: Mark Thompson article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-06-15T20:44:08.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:46:04.205Z article:section: Politics og:title: What Does the Military Think of Trump? og:description: Two retired officers had strong words. og:url: https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2e34c6fd12801aaf/698898043c16391ffe45daae/rtx2g80i.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3602 og:image:height: 2026 og:image:alt: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement accompanied by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford after a meeting with Obama's national security team og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: What Does the Military Think of Trump? twitter:description: Two retired officers had strong words. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2e34c6fd12801aaf/698898043c16391ffe45daae/rtx2g80i.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # What Does the Military Think of Donald Trump? > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME D.C. Brief: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition D.C. Brief is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington. D.C. Brief goes beyond the Washington headlines to explain the politics, personalities and power dynamics shaping what happens next. Senior correspondent Philip Elliott brings sharp context to the issues driving the capital, connecting the decisions made in Washington to the institutions, industries and people they affect. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=2a170382-1627-41d2-af5d-ac2101e195c3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Philip Elliott, Senior Correspondent | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership The policy influence ecosystem. A policy-focused audience spanning government, public affairs, advocacy, law, research, political media, and the institutions that make, interpret and respond to public policy. ### TIME D.C. Brief: key statements * D.C. Brief is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * D.C. Brief is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/newsletters?i=2a170382-1627-41d2-af5d-ac2101e195c3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3/subscribe?i=2a170382-1627-41d2-af5d-ac2101e195c3&cr=time-nl-dcbrief-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is TIME's politics newsletter? D.C. Brief is TIME's Washington newsletter, written by senior correspondent Philip Elliott. It explains the politics, personalities and power dynamics behind the headlines, three times a week. #### Where can I get analysis of Washington politics by email? D.C. Brief is TIME's free Washington politics newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. It is written by a TIME senior correspondent who covers the capital full time. #### Who writes TIME's D.C. Brief? Philip Elliott, a senior correspondent at TIME, writes D.C. Brief. #### Is D.C. Brief free? Yes. D.C. Brief is free at time.com/newsletters. by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 15, 2016 8:44 PM UTC  President Obama denounces Trump as General Joseph Dunford looks on. President Obama denounces Trump as General Joseph Dunford looks on. Carlos Barria—Reuters by [Mark Thompson](https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/) ## Mark Thompson Jun 15, 2016 8:44 PM UTC What was surprising about President Obama’s denunciation of Donald Trump’s anti-immigrant terrorism policy Tuesday _wasn’t_ the fact that Obama never mentioned Trump by name. He didn’t have to. “We now have proposals from the presumptive Republican nominee for President of the United States to bar all Muslims from emigrating to America,” an angry Obama [declared](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/06/14/remarks-president-after-counter-isil-meeting) as the nation’s emotions remained raw from Sunday’s slaughter of 49 people in Orlando, by a killer who professed support for radical Islam. “We hear language that singles out immigrants and suggests that entire religious communities are complicit in violence. Where does this stop?” What _was_ surprising was that the nation’s top military officer stood by the President’s side as the commander-in-chief issued an extraordinary public rebuke of the man seeking to be that general’s next boss. Washington corridors were abuzz Wednesday after the ramrod-straight and uniformed presence of Marine General Joseph Dunford, chairman of the [Joint Chiefs of Staff](http://www.jcs.mil/About.aspx), provided, wittingly or not, a beribboned endorsement of Obama’s condemnation of Trump. “If you’re going to make a political speech, and that’s what this was, you should not have the chairman, or anybody in uniform, standing next to you as a potted plant,” says Anthony Zinni, a retired four-star Marine. “It gives the appearance that he’s in agreement with the political statements that were made.” Zinni and other former senior officers believe Dunford was uncomfortably trapped after Obama’s ISIS remarks drifted into the political realm. Dunford’s spokesman wouldn’t go that far, simply saying that the chairman “remains apolitical” and routinely appears with Obama when the President makes comments following such ISIS sessions. Tuesday’s appearance, Navy Captain Gregory Hicks said, “was no different.” There is private concern inside the U.S. armed forces about Trump’s fitness for command, but good luck getting anyone to say so on the record. The military is built upon what it calls “good order and discipline,” a pair of attributes rarely attributed to Trump. While a recent unscientific independent _Military Times_ newspaper [survey](http://www.militarytimes.com/story/military/election/2016/05/09/military-times-survey-donald-trump-beats-hillary-clinton/84132402/) had Trump outpolling all-but-certain Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton by a greater than 2-to-1 margin, many view that as a desire for change rather than support for Trump. “There is concern in the military about Trump, but they really want a change,” Zinni says. “There’s a lot of unhappiness about the plight of the military, the funding and the way wars are being prosecuted.” According to this thinking, Clinton is unlikely to make such wholesale changes in the U.S. military. U.S. voters always want to know that their potential Presidents have the confidence of the 1.4 million Americans in uniform. For the Pentagon, the best way to do that is to say it respects the will of the voters, and will salute smartly no matter who is in the Oval Office. Both those in uniform and their civilian overseers stress their desire to steer clear of politics. Defense Secretary Ash Carter, for example, stiff-armed a reporter Monday who asked about Trump’s statement that NATO is “obsolete” (like Obama, the reporter didn’t name Trump). “I’ve got to be very strict in this regard,” Carter [said](http://www.defense.gov/News/News-Transcripts/Transcript-View/Article/798363/remarks-by-secretary-carter-in-a-press-gaggle-en-route-to-belgium). “You frame a question in terms of the presidential campaign and I’m just not going to answer a question that’s framed in that way.” General Mark Welsh, who as the Air Force chief of staff is a member of the Joint Chiefs, said Wednesday that he and his fellow chiefs don’t fret about politics and campaigns. “I want a commander-in-chief who will listen to us, I want a commander-in-chief who values the opinion of the chairman of the Joint Chiefs,” he tells TIME. “I’d like a commander-in-chief who’s thoughtful on issues and is willing to engage in discussion, and a commander-in-chief who has a team around him that feels the same way.” Might that rule out Trump? “I’ve never met him; I don’t know,” Welsh says. “I’ll tell you, if you watch political campaigns over time, there’s a whole lot of behavior that you would kind of question, I think, not just from any one particular candidate.” The military, he adds, doesn’t play favorites. “Our job is to support the commander-in-chief as much as we can, and whoever walks into the White House is going to get that support from all of us.” But retired officers don’t have to watch their words so carefully. “Mr. Trump is a potential disaster as commander-in-chief—uninformed, volatile, poor judgment,” says Barry McCaffrey, a retired four-star Army officer. “Hard to believe this is the candidate of a major political party.” “Trump is unexpectedly increasing my enthusiasm for Hillary,” adds retired general Merrill McPeak, who, like Welsh, served on the Joint Chiefs as the Air Force chief of staff. “What he is saying is not based on facts: it’s based on immaturity, bad judgment and ignorance, and I think it’s going to be hard for people in uniform who are thoughtful about this, to vote for him.” The military’s aversion to partisan politics is on display nearly every January, when the President heads to Capitol Hill to tell the Congress, the Supreme Court justices, the Joint Chiefs and the American people about the Administration’s plans for the coming year. It’s an intensely political event, with Democrats and Republicans either cheering wildly or sitting stone-faced, depending on whether or not the chief executive belongs to their party. “The service chiefs and the Supreme Court justices can’t applaud any of the lines,” Zinni says. “Fortunately, if you’re a combatant commander”—which Zinni was—“you don’t have to worry about that Washington bullshit.” Actually, it’s a little more complicated than that. The kabuki dance begins with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs keeping a close eye on the chief justice, McPeak recalls. “The chief justice is a separate branch of government, and if he stands and applauds, then the chairman will stand up and applaud, and the chiefs will follow,” he says. “The chief justice was considered the guy who was neutral, and who knew when to stand up and applaud.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/"},"headline":"What Does the Military Think of Donald Trump?","datePublished":"2016-06-15T20:44:08.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:46:04.205Z","description":"There is private concern inside the U.S. armed forces about Trump’s fitness for command, but few will say so on the record.","url":"https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/","keywords":["Military","2016 Election","White House","Terrorism","Donald Trump","Orlando Shooting"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2e34c6fd12801aaf/698898043c16391ffe45daae/rtx2g80i.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Mark Thompson","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/mark-thompson/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2e34c6fd12801aaf/698898043c16391ffe45daae/rtx2g80i.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement accompanied by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford after a meeting with Obama's national security team","caption":"U.S. President Barack Obama delivers a statement accompanied by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Joseph Dunford after a meeting with Obama's national security team","creditText":"Carlos Barria—Reuters","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/military/","name":"Military"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4370608/donald-trump-military/","name":"What Does the Military Think of Donald Trump?"}}]}] ```