<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/" -->

---
title: Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical
description: Dr. Amy Tuteur&#x27;s response to the account of the mother who was angry at her doctor for how he handled her baby’s Down Syndrome diagnosis.
canonical: https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/
author: Dr. Amy Tuteur
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2016-06-09T14:14:42.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T22:28:54.813Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical
og:description: Good medical care always requires providing complete and accurate information
og:url: https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2560
og:image:height: 1440
og:image:alt: Doctor talking to patient, soft focus
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical
twitter:description: Good medical care always requires providing complete and accurate information
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="eb2dcc2b-1395-4d38-8b0c-b1673955da84" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=eb2dcc2b-1395-4d38-8b0c-b1673955da84&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=eb2dcc2b-1395-4d38-8b0c-b1673955da84&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=eb2dcc2b-1395-4d38-8b0c-b1673955da84&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Jun 9, 2016 2:14 PM UTC

![Doctor talking to patient, soft focus](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Altrendo images/Getty Images

by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Jun 9, 2016 2:14 PM UTC

There’s definitely a wrong way to give an unexpected medical diagnosis.

In 2000 I was diagnosed with a benign brain tumor, a meningioma. I knew that the tumor would need to be removed, but I was shocked when the ophthalmologist declared: “I’m so glad that I’m not the neurosurgeon who’s going to operate. It’ll be tough; that sucker is sitting in the middle of your brain in a lake of blood.”

But while it’s easy to determine the wrong way for a doctor to give unexpected bad news, it’s surprisingly difficult to figure out the right way to give a specific diagnosis to a specific person. That’s what I thought when I read the account of the mother who was angry at her doctor for the way he handled her baby’s diagnosis of Down Syndrome.

Courtney Baker wrote a [letter](http://abcnews.go.com/Lifestyle/mom-baby-syndrome-mail-letter-doctor-suggested-abortion/story?id=39666410) to the doctor who told her about her daughter Emersyn Faith’s diagnosis:

---

> “”

---

Those are powerful words, but what if the opposite had occurred? What if a patient receiving the prenatal diagnosis of Down’s Syndrome was not counseled about her child’s prognosis and told instead that her child would be perfect? That’s unethical because every doctor has an obligation to tell a patient the truth about a diagnosis. No one can make an informed decision about medical treatment (or forgoing treatment) unless they have accurate information, yet different patients may receive the same information very differently.


One woman who receives a diagnosis of advanced metastatic breast cancer with a poor prognosis may be grateful to hear about the relatively low chances that a grueling treatment regimen will affect the outcome; it allows her to make an informed decision about whether to accept the treatment. Another woman, receiving the exact same diagnosis in the exact same way, may be very angry, believing that the doctor is stealing her hope.

Similarly, one woman who receives the unexpected diagnosis that her unborn child has Down Syndrome might welcome a detailed discussion of the child’s potential. She needs that information to decide to continue or terminate the pregnancy. Another woman, like Baker, may resent being counseled about terminating her pregnancy, eager to love and care for a child with a disability.

Moreover, the way that a patient responds to an unexpected medical diagnosis depends in large part on the patient’s experience and values. The diagnosis of advanced metastatic breast cancer is going to mean something different to a woman who watched her mother die in agony from the same disease than it means to a woman whose mother responded well to aggressive chemotherapy and radiation.


The patient’s religious beliefs can deeply affect the way he or she receives the diagnosis. One person may believe that unborn children are sacred. Another may feel that pregnancy termination is an important right and valuable option.

Could Baker’s doctor have been more supportive? I can’t say because I haven’t heard his views, and patient confidentiality prevents him from sharing them. But I can say that good medical care always requires providing complete and accurate information—not merely the information that a patient wishes to hear.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/"},"headline":"Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical","datePublished":"2016-06-09T14:14:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T22:28:54.813Z","description":"Good medical care always requires providing complete and accurate information","url":"https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/","keywords":["health"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Dr. Amy Tuteur","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt781a4f17d3e7fdcc/69889702656a3f4f4abcbd86/doctor-unexpected-diagnoses.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Doctor talking to patient, soft focus","caption":"Doctor talking to patient, soft focus","creditText":"Altrendo images/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4362023/baby-down-syndrome-ethics/","name":"Not Discussing Down Syndrome Complications Is Unethical"}}]}]
```

