--- title: Attorneys General Investigate Oil Industry Ads description: A new coalition asks what the industry knew about climate change—and when it knew it canonical: https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/ author: Jeffrey Kluger article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-04-26T20:55:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:55:45.095Z article:section: Ideas og:title: 'Why the Government is Right to Investigate Oil Industry Ads' og:description: A new coalition of 25 Attorneys General asks what the industry knew about climate change og:url: https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbf951e901daa59/698890b35f570fa836b20a4a/pollution.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5586 og:image:height: 3142 og:image:alt: What smoke? That's just uncertainty og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: 'Why the Government is Right to Investigate Oil Industry Ads' twitter:description: A new coalition of 25 Attorneys General asks what the industry knew about climate change twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbf951e901daa59/698890b35f570fa836b20a4a/pollution.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why the Government is Right to Investigate Oil Industry Ads > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7dba7ba3-bb84-437d-ac2e-da06cd75ecc0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=7dba7ba3-bb84-437d-ac2e-da06cd75ecc0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=7dba7ba3-bb84-437d-ac2e-da06cd75ecc0&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: See Leonardo Dicaprio Slam Corporate Greed in the Fight Against Climate Change [Watch (HLS stream): See Leonardo Dicaprio Slam Corporate Greed in the Fight Against Climate Change](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/nth4pp3e.m3u8) (0:32)  _Published 2016-01-20. See Leonardo Dicaprio Slam Corporate Greed in the Fight Against Climate Change_  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Apr 26, 2016 8:55 PM UTC  What smoke? That's just uncertainty What smoke? That's just uncertaintyColin Monteath/ Hedgehog House; Getty Images/Minden Pictures RM  by [Jeffrey Kluger](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/)  ## Jeffrey Kluger Editor at Large Apr 26, 2016 8:55 PM UTC Nobody pretends that marketing a product in a capitalist economy is a completely honest process. The entire enterprise can be captured in the caveat, “Your results may vary.” But while companies are permitted all manner of advertising puffery, there is one fundamental rule they’re expected to obey: Don’t make stuff up. It’s the reason that while soda manufacturers aren’t yet required to warn consumers that the use of their product can lead to obesity, diabetes and more, they’re still not allowed to run ads saying that, whattya’ know, according to scientific research, drinking a 32-ounce soda containing the equivalent of 16 packets of sugar is a perfectly healthy thing to do. It’s the reason that while manufacturers of disposable diapers may plausibly make the case that laundering cloth diapers actually has a bigger environmental impact than throwing away paper ones, they don’t claim that a landfill stuffed with dirty nappies is actually good for the planet. And it’s the reason too that a [newly announced](http://www.ag.ny.gov/press-release/ag-schneiderman-former-vice-president-al-gore-and-coalition-attorneys-general-across) coalition of attorneys general from 25 states and cities as well as the Virgin Islands—led by New York State Attorney General Eric Schneiderman—is right to be investigating the oil companies and their industry groups to determine if they deliberately misled consumers and shareholders about the risks of climate change. It was Schneiderman alone who launched [the investigation](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/11/06/science/exxon-mobil-under-investigation-in-new-york-over-climate-statements.html?%5Fr=0) last November, looking into whether ExxonMobil knew about the risks of greenhouse gases as long ago as the early 1980s and took prudent steps to protect its own assets—such as raising its offshore oil platforms to prepare for rising sea levels—at the same time it was bankrolling efforts to deny there was any meaningful danger at all. In 1996, for example, according to a [joint investigation](http://graphics.latimes.com/oil-operations/) by the Columbia University School of Journalism and the Los Angeles Times, engineers at Mobil Oil—which had yet to merge with Exxon—were drafting design specifications for a gas field project off the coast of Nova Scotia and made it a point to note, “An estimated rise in water level, due to global warming, of 0.5 meters,” was possible over the course of the project’s 25 years. But a newspaper ad the company took out the next year had a decidedly different tone: “Let’s face it: The science of climate change is too uncertain to mandate a plan of action that could plunge economies into turmoil. Scientists cannot predict with certainty if temperatures will increase, by how much and where changes will occur.” That’s a pattern that goes back a lot of years. As long ago as the early 1980s, Exxon and other oil companies were investigating the role of greenhouse gasses in warming the planet and were doing solid, if secretive, research—research that Schneiderman himself applauds. “They were compared to Bell Labs as being at the leadership of doing good scientific work,” he said in an [interview with PBS’s _Frontline_](http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/exxon-mobil-mislead-public-climate-change-research/). Good science being done with one hand, however, was being offset by faux science spread by the other. The companies bankrolled groups like the vaguely named Global Climate Coalition and the Frontiers of Freedom Institute that conducted lobbying and advertising campaigns to cast doubt on climate research, framing the entire matter as just too complex and uncertain to warrant action. A [leaked memo](https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/784572-api-global-climate-science-communications-plan.html) of a 1998 meeting of the American Petroleum Institute, the industry’s trade association, is especially damning. At the time, the group was working to develop a response to the 1997 Kyoto Protocol, a global effort to cut greenhouse emissions. Repeatedly stressing the need to highlight the “uncertainties” of climate science, the memo argued: “Unless ‘climate change’ becomes a non-issue, meaning that the Kyoto protocol is defeated and that there are no further initiatives to thwart the threat of climate change, there may be no moment when we can declare victory for our efforts…Victory will be achieved when average citizens ‘understand’ (recognize) uncertainties in climate science…'” If that sounds like a page torn from the pernicious playbook of the tobacco industry, it’s because it is. In 1958, the manufacturers who brought you “[More Doctors Smoke Camels Than Any Other Cigarette](http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco%5Fmain/images.php?token2=fm%5Fst001.php&token1=fm%5Fimg0002.php&theme%5Ffile=fm%5Fmt001.php&theme%5Fname=Doctors%20Smoking&subtheme%5Fname=More%20Doctors%20Smoke%20Camels)” and Lucky Strike’s “[I protect my voice with Luckies](http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco%5Fmain/slogans.php)” established The Tobacco Institute, a group charged with promoting both ostensible good news about cigarettes and uncertainty about health studies that said otherwise. That kind of back and forth was more than enough doubt to keep a lot of smokers smoking—and ultimately suffering for it. Assuming the oil industry has indeed been practicing that kind of flim flam—and so far Schneiderman’s investigation is _only_ an investigation—it’s not only unethical but possibly illegal. Knowing the clear and present danger of climate change but taking out ads that argue the opposite could be a violation of New York State’s Martin Act, which outlaws fraud or misrepresentation in the sale of securities. You’re free to sell your stock, but not to fib about the outlook for the company’s future. In 2015, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, (D, RI) even [raised the specter](https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/the-fossil-fuel-industrys-campaign-to-mislead-the-american-people/2015/05/29/04a2c448-0574-11e5-8bda-c7b4e9a8f7ac%5Fstory.html) of turning to the RICO (Racketeer Influenced Corrupt Organization) Act, to call the oil companies to account—the same law used against Big Tobacco. The oil industry denies ill-intent, and points—rightly—to the fact it quit funding most climate-denial groups about ten years ago. And even Schneiderman concedes that there’s a difference between corporate advocating and fabricating—that oil companies can certainly argue their side without lying about the other. Honest advocacy may indeed be all the companies were practicing. But if the tobacco lesson teaches us anything, it’s that corporate interests can sometimes speak a lot louder than scientific facts. And when they do, people get hurt. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/"},"headline":"Why the Government is Right to Investigate Oil Industry Ads","datePublished":"2016-04-26T20:55:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:55:45.095Z","description":"A new coalition of 25 Attorneys General asks what the industry knew about climate change—and when it knew it","url":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/","keywords":["Environment","climate change","global warming"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbf951e901daa59/698890b35f570fa836b20a4a/pollution.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey Kluger","jobTitle":"Editor at Large","url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-kluger/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt1dbf951e901daa59/698890b35f570fa836b20a4a/pollution.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"What smoke? That's just uncertainty","caption":"What smoke? That's just uncertainty","creditText":"Colin Monteath/ Hedgehog House; Getty Images/Minden Pictures RM","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/environment/","name":"Environment"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/","name":"Why the Government is Right to Investigate Oil Industry Ads"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Historic Climate Agreement Signed","description":"Heads of state and high level diplomats from more than 170 countries signed the Paris Agreement at the United Nations Friday, a key step toward implementing the world’s most significant agreement to address global warming.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/Z8SNjpQQ/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-04-22T17:33:24.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/Z8SNjpQQ.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/","duration":"PT1M1S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"See Leonardo Dicaprio Slam Corporate Greed in the Fight Against Climate Change","description":"See Leonardo Dicaprio Slam Corporate Greed in the Fight Against Climate Change","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/nth4pp3e/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-01-20T07:29:25.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/nth4pp3e.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/","duration":"PT32S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4307669/oil-industry-ads-investigation/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```