--- title: Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO description: The alliance must reinforce its deterrent power canonical: https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-03-31T09:00:23.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:55:59.422Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO og:description: The alliance must reinforce its deterrent power og:url: https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7197b2aa570dfa33/69888d07428a9e27decd2012/putin1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3500 og:image:height: 1969 og:image:alt: Russian President Vladimir Putin attends his weekly meeting with members of Govenment at Novo-Ogaryovo State Residence in Moscow on March 30, 2016. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO twitter:description: The alliance must reinforce its deterrent power twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7197b2aa570dfa33/69888d07428a9e27decd2012/putin1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f628b52c-471e-4e82-8d6f-a125585eeb89&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=f628b52c-471e-4e82-8d6f-a125585eeb89&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=f628b52c-471e-4e82-8d6f-a125585eeb89&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Putin's Band of Loyal Celebrities [Watch (HLS stream): Putin's Band of Loyal Celebrities](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/eu0uTiqi.m3u8) (1:51)  _Published 2014-08-20. Western celebrities were once willing to make public appearances in Russia. With few exceptions, the stars have stopped coming_ by [James B. Foley](https://time.com/author/james-b-foley/) ## James B. Foley Mar 31, 2016 9:00 AM UTC  Russian President Vladimir Putin attends his weekly meeting with members of Govenment at Novo-Ogaryovo State Residence in Moscow on March 30, 2016. Russian President Vladimir Putin attends his weekly meeting with members of Govenment at Novo-Ogaryovo State Residence in Moscow on March 30, 2016. Mikhail Svetlov—Getty Images by [James B. Foley](https://time.com/author/james-b-foley/) ## James B. Foley Mar 31, 2016 9:00 AM UTC These are consequential times for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization and its member states. Justly touted as the most successful military alliance in history—having deterred Soviet aggression and prevailed in the Cold War—today NATO confronts a resurgent Russia on its borders and a metastasizing terrorist threat directed from abroad and incubated from within. Russian pressure on NATO’s perimeter, combined with terrorist mayhem on the streets of Paris, Ankara, Istanbul and Brussels, make for a formidable challenge to an alliance whose military capabilities and resolve had steadily weakened over the past two decades. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg therefore [arrives](https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/03/25/statement-press-secretary-visit-nato-secretary-general-jens-stoltenberg) in Washington next week with weighty issues on the agenda, none more pressing than the need to bolster and reassure those member states, from the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea, most directly and uncomfortably in the crosshairs of Putin’s Russia. Stoltenberg will discuss with U.S. officials measures the alliance may adopt at its upcoming July summit in Warsaw to counter growing Russian threats. As Polish Foreign Minister Witold Waszczykowski boldly demanded in a recent [interview](http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/foreign-minister-poland-wants-to-be-protected-right-now): “We want to be protected right now.” Vladimir Putin has been remarkably candid about his strategic goal: to roll back the historic losses suffered by the Soviet Union at the close of the Cold War, and to restore Russia’s status and prestige as a great power and peer competitor of the U.S. This ambition has profound consequences for the whole of Europe. Those now independent states formerly part of the Soviet Union—notably including current NATO Baltics members Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia—face a potential future of attenuated sovereignty and a perpetual risk of aggression, as evidenced by Russia’s [invasion of Georgia](http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1043236/Georgia-overrun-Russian-troops-scale-ground-invasion-begins.html) in 2008, [annexation of Crimea](http://www.cbsnews.com/news/russia-annexes-crimea-away-from-ukraine-with-signature-from-vladimir-putin/) in 2014 and ongoing [military campaign](http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/dec/17/vladimir-putin-admits-russian-military-presence-ukraine) in the eastern part of Ukraine. Those states in the historic buffer zone of Central and Eastern Europe, formerly Soviet satellites in the Warsaw Pact and now full-fledged members of NATO, face an unending prospect of harassment and intimidation—what Poland’s Waszcykowski [described](http://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/foreign-minister-poland-wants-to-be-protected-right-now) as “an aggressive neighbor that is openly proclaiming the redrawing of the borders of Europe.” Finally, even historic NATO member Turkey, guardian of the Alliance’s strategic southeastern flank, faces a burgeoning [Russian military buildup across](http://www.horizonweekly.ca/news/details/80708) its border in neighboring Armenia, while simultaneously being squeezed by Russia’s [military intervention](http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/15/world/middleeast/russian-military-uses-syria-as-proving-ground-and-west-takes-notice.html) across its border with an imploding Syria. It could indeed be argued that Putin’s ultimate aim is no less than to achieve the age-old Soviet goal of breaking up NATO and driving the U.S. out of Europe once and for all. He evidently believes that NATO’s expansion following the Cold War brought on board weak and vulnerable states who cannot easily be defended, and that NATO’s resolve to defend them is itself fundamentally weak. He views the [drawdown in U.S. forces](http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/land/army-aviation/2015/05/02/us-army-cutting-helicopters-troops-in-europe/26650767/) from Europe and the [steep reduction in defense spending](http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics%5F67655.htm) by most European allies as indicative of diminished capabilities. He sows disarray by driving refugees into Europe through [reckless bombing](http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/russian-air-strikes-kill-1000-civilians-syria-160120135601455.html) of civilians in Syria. Exposing NATO as a hollow shell through a combination of aggression and intimidation, he seeks eventually to create in its wake a new security system in Europe with Russia at its core. All of this underscores what is at stake for NATO today, which is above all the need to reinforce the credibility of its deterrent power. There can be, and there have been, honest differences of opinion about how much to support an independent country subject to Russian aggression such as Ukraine, which Russia covets as a kind of vassal state and for whom the U.S. and its European allies have no treaty obligations. Critics on both sides have argued persuasively both that muscular support to Ukraine was critical to checking Russia elsewhere and that doing so was futile, provocative or both. But when it comes to any potential Russian threat to NATO member states there can be no debate and no ambiguity whatsoever. American security, and that of all of our treaty allies, depends utterly on the credibility of NATO’s [Article 5 security guarantee](http://www.nato.int/cps/is/natohq/topics%5F110496.htm?)—the certainty that the alliance collectively will spring to the defense of a member state threatened with, or subject to, attack. Both NATO members and any potential aggressor must believe that the alliance possesses the will, capabilities and intention to deliver on that solemn pledge of mutual defense. Indeed, the perception that this is so can be sufficient to dissuade a would-be aggressor in the first place. That is the most profound lesson from NATO’s success in the Cold War—credible deterrence can actually prevent conflict from occurring, and intimidation from working. In concrete terms, what the alliance needs to do to shore up its flanks and bolster deterrence in the Baltics and Central and Eastern Europe is clear. This will involve manpower and materiel—training, exercises and the upgrading of NATO’s military presence and capabilities across those regions such that confidence in the alliance’s will and ability to defend its members is firmly established. Nowhere is this more important than in the Baltics states, but clearly Poland and its neighbors are looking for tangible reassurance as well. Turkey, on the other hand, an ally with an impressive commitment to self-defense, is in a separate category. Its strategic importance to NATO and to the West is arguably greater today than during the Cold War, given its role as gateway to a fast disintegrating Middle East in addition to its historic adversarial relationship with Russia. Russia has been aggressively expanding its footprint around Turkey’s borders—in Syria to the south, in Crimea and Ukraine to the north, and—most recently—Armenia to the east. Over the past year alone, the Russian military has deployed [advanced drone aircraft](http://tass.ru/en/defense/848708), [helicopter gunships](http://tass.ru/en/defense/847102http:/tass.ru/en/defense/847102) and [ballistic missiles](//0D465C34-9332-4D95-9C39-D25E977D6DE6/v) into Armenia. Little known is the fact that Armenia has also welcomed an estimated [5,000 Russia military personnel](http://www.themoscowtimes.com/%20news/article/medvedev-secures-long-term-foothold-in-armenia/413400.html) and hosts two Russian military bases—including one within several miles of Turkey’s border. Given the chaos Turkey is facing in Syria to the south and the potentially destabilizing spillover from the conflict inside Turkey itself, as evidenced by the recent horrific terrorist attacks in [Ankara](http://www.business-standard.com/article/pti-stories/car-bombing-kills-27-in-central-ankara-116031400030%5F1.html) and [Istanbul](http://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/20/world/europe/istanbul-turkey-bombing.html?%5Fr=0), it is clear that Russia aims through the pressure of encirclement to intimidate if not destabilize Turkey and bend its foreign policy to its will. Fortunately, Turkey is not an ally in need of upgraded NATO military commitments; cooperation with the U.S. in particular is robust, as evidenced by the agreement enabling U.S. aircraft operating out of [Incirlik](http://www.reuters.com/article/us-mideast-crisis-usa-airbase-idUSKCN0PX2B520150723) air base in southern Turkey to strike ISIS targets in Syria. What Turkey requires in the current circumstances is simply an affirmation of solidarity in view of the dire threats it is combating, and a validation of its continuing strategic importance to the NATO Alliance and our mutual security. General Philip Breedlove, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander, could not have defined the challenge more succinctly when in recent [congressional testimony](http://www.defense.gov/News-Article-View/Article/683569/breedlove-european-security-situation-serious-complicated) he called Russia “an existential threat to the United States, and to our European allies and partners.” Through threats and blandishments, and divide and conquer tactics, Putin seeks to destroy the alliance’s confidence and cohesion. NATO successfully countered this approach during the Cold War and, with determined U.S. leadership, we have the ability to counter it again. But there are new dimensions to this old equation that make the challenge especially difficult. One relates to growing doubts over U.S. credibility in the world and the U.S. commitment to Europe in particular—anxieties that Putin readily exploits. The other new dimension is Putin himself, in particular the perception that he is more opportunistic, and perhaps reckless, than any Russian or Soviet leader since Khrushchev. Given his now demonstrated record of aggression in Georgia and Ukraine, and the sheer brutality of his military campaigns in Chechnya and Syria, it is clear that the most important step the U.S. can take to maintain security in Europe is to fortify and reassure any NATO member states potentially subject to Russian pressure. Standing with our allies is the surest way to deter aggression and secure peace. It is a lesson from the Cold War we should never forget. ## Transcript [ MUSIC ] Vladimir Putin has always liked having a lot of friends in Hollywood and he's been pretty good at keeping them around. Back in 2010 when he was serving as Russia's Prime Minister. He gave that bizarre performance at a gala in St. Petersburg, and there were about a dozen big name stars in the audience. Kevin Costner was there, Monica Bellucci, Kurt Russell, Goldie Hawn, Vincent Cassel. The men who arranged for most of them to come is this Hollywood talent broker named Samuel Aroutounian. You can see him in the clip next to Sharon Stone, looking a little confused, he is pretty much the go to guy in Russia if you want to hire celebrity for your party. But he says lately this business has been doing a little bad, with the war in Ukraine, Russia's image in the West is really been taking a beating ,. And he says most Hollywood stars these days are trying to keep their distance. So it's only been the diehard Putin fans who are still coming around. The main one is Steven Seagal who recently gave a blues concert in Crimea, which is pretty much ground zero in Russia's conflict with the west. [ MUSIC ] No man has the right to condone, condemn another man for what he believes in. The only Oscar winners spotted in Russia lately has been Mickey Rourke, who came to red square recently to buy a t shirt, with Putin's face on it. I think he's a good guy. If I didn't, I, believe me, I wouldn't wear the t- shirt. But both of them had been getting quite a bit of flack in the west for those appearances. So if Putin wanted to do some kind of Blueberry Hill reunion, he'd probably wouldn't be able to pull it off. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/"},"headline":"Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO","datePublished":"2016-03-31T09:00:23.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:55:59.422Z","description":"The alliance must reinforce its deterrent power","url":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/","keywords":["world affairs","russia","NATO"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7197b2aa570dfa33/69888d07428a9e27decd2012/putin1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"James B. Foley","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/james-b-foley/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt7197b2aa570dfa33/69888d07428a9e27decd2012/putin1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Russian President Vladimir Putin attends his weekly meeting with members of Govenment at Novo-Ogaryovo State Residence in Moscow on March 30, 2016.","caption":"Russian President Vladimir Putin attends his weekly meeting with members of Govenment at Novo-Ogaryovo State Residence in Moscow on March 30, 2016.","creditText":"Mikhail Svetlov—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/world-affairs/","name":"world affairs"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/","name":"Don’t Let Vladimir Putin Destroy NATO"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"What Does the Future Hold for Russia?","description":"TIME Editor-at-Large Ian Bremmer on Russia","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/YH4HSUuc/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-10-27T17:21:01.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/YH4HSUuc.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/","duration":"PT2M3S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Putin's Band of Loyal Celebrities","description":"Western celebrities were once willing to make public appearances in Russia. With few exceptions, the stars have stopped coming","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/eu0uTiqi/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2014-08-20T17:04:00.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/eu0uTiqi.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/","duration":"PT1M51S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4276525/vladimir-putin-nato/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```