--- title: Obama's 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is Gimmick description: Religious nonprofits should not have to cover contraception. Period. canonical: https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/ author: Rob Schwarzwalder article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-03-22T15:22:38.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T16:02:31.790Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Obama's Religious 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is a Gimmick og:description: Religious nonprofits should not have to cover contraception. Period. og:url: https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4cd96d691f0e80c7/69888bde524fc0f7fbdf7467/obama1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a reception for Women's History Month in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 16, 2016. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Obama's Religious 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is a Gimmick twitter:description: Religious nonprofits should not have to cover contraception. Period. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4cd96d691f0e80c7/69888bde524fc0f7fbdf7467/obama1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Obama's Religious 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is a Gimmick > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c9ac4870-a711-460b-bbe1-5269cc5671e5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=c9ac4870-a711-460b-bbe1-5269cc5671e5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=c9ac4870-a711-460b-bbe1-5269cc5671e5&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Rob Schwarzwalder](https://time.com/author/rob-schwarzwalder/) ## Rob Schwarzwalder Mar 22, 2016 3:22 PM UTC  U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a reception for Women's History Month in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 16, 2016. U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a reception for Women's History Month in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 16, 2016. Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images by [Rob Schwarzwalder](https://time.com/author/rob-schwarzwalder/) ## Rob Schwarzwalder Mar 22, 2016 3:22 PM UTC In September 1862, Abraham Lincoln [met with a delegation of clergy from Wisconsin](http://quoteinvestigator.com/2015/11/15/legs/). They were discussing freedom for the slaves, and Lincoln—who later that month would sign the Emancipation Proclamation—decided to play devil’s advocate, probing the pastors with this question: Would declaring the slaves free actually make them so? “If I should call a sheep’s tail a leg, how many legs would it have?” he asked. “Five,” was the response. “No,” said the Rail Splitter. “Only four; for my calling the tail a leg would not make it so.” This past July, the Obama administration issued a final [rule](https://www.cms.gov/cciio/resources/fact-sheets-and-faqs/womens-preven-02012013.html) requiring non-profit employers to cover “preventive care services for women.” This means that employers are being compelled to provide—through the insurance coverage they offer to their employees—contraceptives, sterilization and drugs and devices despite their moral objections. In other words, Evangelical Protestant and observant Catholic institutions—colleges and universities, hospitals, even religious orders—have to violate their most sacred convictions concerning the personhood of unborn children or else face massive fines. The Supreme Court will hear arguments in [_Zubik v. Burwell_](http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/zubik-v-burwell/)_,_ seven consolidated [cases on the issue](http://www.scotusblog.com/2015/11/court-to-hear-birth-control-challenges/), on March 23\. The administration says that its rule contains a so-called “[accommodation](https://www.cms.gov/CCIIO/Resources/Fact-Sheets-and-FAQs/womens-preven-02012013.html),” the sequence of which runs like this: Objecting parties can notify the federal Department of Health and Human Services in writing of their objection to providing any of these services. This triggers an HHS notification to the employer’s health-insurance company or Third Party Administrator to provide employees with the drugs and devices required by the HHS Mandate. Or the objecting parties can fill out a self-certification form and register their objection to their insurance company themselves. This paradigm of bureaucratic obfuscation retains the same result as before the so-called “accommodation.” In whatever way the notification takes place, the end result is the same: The insurer provides the same contraceptives, sterilization and drugs and devices on behalf of the employer and through the employer’s health-insurance company to employees. Under this accounting gimmick, religious and nonprofit employers still remain the legal gateway for, and are forced to pay for the coverage, which in turn includes the objectionable services for their employees by government fiat. Whether the insurance company eats the cost of the “free” contraceptive or abortifacient drugs is not the issue. What is the issue is whether the government should require the employer offering insurance at its own expense to include services which violates its beliefs. The Obama mandate affects charities, universities, hospitals or others with moral or religious objections. The final rule also lays out a similar so-called “accommodation” for closely-held for-profit organizations. The administration’s gimmick is just that: a phony political sleight-of-hand designed to obscure the real issues. Many faith-based groups are refusing to bend. Among them are the Little Sisters of the Poor, an order of Catholic nuns who “[serve the elderly poor in over 30 countries around the world](http://www.littlesistersofthepoor.org/),” according to its mission statement. Family Research Council is proud [to have filed an _amicus_ brief](http://downloads.frc.org/EF/EF16A12.pdf) in partnership with the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, World Vision, the Cardinal Newman Society and other groups in support of the Sisters’ right to practice their deep “reverence for the sacredness of human life and for the uniqueness of each person, especially those who are poorest and/or weakest.” In total, [more than 40 _amicus_ briefs have been filed](http://www.becketfund.org/littlesistersamicus/) on behalf of scores of organizations in support of the right not only of the Little Sisters but of all Americans to practice their faith in the workplace and in the manner in which they provide for their employees. Why this outpouring of support and concern? Because religious liberty is intrinsic to the very foundation of our country: As articulated in the Declaration of Independence, our rights come from God and, therefore, our primary duty is pre-governmental—it is to our Creator Himself. The Supreme Court will issue its ruling in _Zubick v. Burwell_ sometime before the end of June. Regardless of the ruling, the Family Research Council [contends](http://downloads.frcaction.org/EF/EF11I01.pdf) that Congress must pass new protections to stop Obamacare from forcing religious employers to provide objectionable services through their insurer. Rep. Diane Black (R-Tenn.) and Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) have introduced the “[Health Care Conscience Rights Act](https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/940)” to protect the religious freedom of businesses, insurers, employers and individuals under Obamacare. The Obama administration can call its coercion and repression of religious liberty an “accommodation,” but that doesn’t make it one any more than Mr. Lincoln’s sheep’s tail makes that tail a leg. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/"},"headline":"Obama's Religious 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is a Gimmick","datePublished":"2016-03-22T15:22:38.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T16:02:31.790Z","description":"Religious nonprofits should not have to cover contraception. Period.","url":"https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/","keywords":["History","Religion","Law"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4cd96d691f0e80c7/69888bde524fc0f7fbdf7467/obama1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Rob Schwarzwalder","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/rob-schwarzwalder/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt4cd96d691f0e80c7/69888bde524fc0f7fbdf7467/obama1.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a reception for Women's History Month in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 16, 2016.","caption":"U.S. President Barack Obama delivers remarks during a reception for Women's History Month in the East Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on March 16, 2016.","creditText":"Chip Somodevilla—Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4264852/zubik-v-burwell-gimmick/","name":"Obama's Religious 'Accommodation' on Birth Control Coverage Is a Gimmick"}}]}] ```