--- title: Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck description: The Republicans dig in canonical: https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/ author: Jay Newton-Small article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-03-16T17:24:06.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-10-05T08:49:44.911Z article:section: Politics og:title: Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck og:description: The Republicans dig in og:url: https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecd289dde913f77b/69888b37196cf4078a03ac4c/obama-merrick-biden.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4455 og:image:height: 2506 og:image:alt: Barack Obama, Merrick Garland og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck twitter:description: The Republicans dig in twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecd289dde913f77b/69888b37196cf4078a03ac4c/obama-merrick-biden.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a3d2d64b-e9f8-49a8-9105-669c8a9ca336&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a3d2d64b-e9f8-49a8-9105-669c8a9ca336&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=a3d2d64b-e9f8-49a8-9105-669c8a9ca336&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=a3d2d64b-e9f8-49a8-9105-669c8a9ca336&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Know Right Now: Obama Chooses Supreme Court Nominee [Watch (HLS stream): Know Right Now: Obama Chooses Supreme Court Nominee](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/bYNSBUhN.m3u8) (1:01)  _Published 2016-03-16_  by [Jay Newton-Small](https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/)  ## Jay Newton-Small Mar 16, 2016 5:24 PM UTC  by [Jay Newton-Small](https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/)  ## Jay Newton-Small Mar 16, 2016 5:24 PM UTC Senate Republicans responded promptly to President’s Obama’s nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court Wednesday with nary a mention of Garland’s name or qualifications. Their aim was to frame Obama’s nomination as nothing more than politics, so that they could defend their decision not to give him a hearing over the coming months. “The decision announced weeks ago is about a principle not a person,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor. “It is clear that the president named this person not with the intent to confirm them but to make it an issue in the campaign.” Arizona Republican John McCain, a Judiciary Committee member who was one of the 32 Republican senators to vote for Garland when he was confirmed by the Senate in 1997 76-23, echoed the sentiment. “This issue is not about any single nominee – it’s about the integrity of the Court,” McCain said in a statement. “With less than a year left in a lame-duck presidency and the long-term ideological balance of the Supreme Court at stake, I believe the American people must have a voice in the direction of the Supreme Court by electing a new president.” Senator John Cornyn, the #2 Senate Republican and Judiciary Committee member, added his voice to the chorus. “At this critical juncture in our nation’s history, Texans and the American people deserve to have a say in the selection of the next lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court,” he announced. The bet here is that Republicans can win back the White House—and hold on to the Senate—allowing them to replace Garland with a more conservative nominee. Though Garland clerked for liberal lion Supreme Court Justice William Brennan, his record is that of a moderate and he is particularly known for his time in President Bill Clinton’s Justice Department, where he prosecuted the Oklahoma City bombers, the Unabomber and the Atlanta Olympics bombers. There is no certainty they the plan will work. The Republican primaries are in disarray and the Party’s frontrunner, Donald Trump, viewed with suspicion or outright hostility by the GOP establishment. McConnell has seven seats to defend that were won by Obama in either 2008 or 2012\. Five of those are already toss ups—and the loss of five would hand Democrats the majority in the Senate. There is an outside chance that McConnell could be forced to change his mind if enough of his vulnerable members call on him to do so. McConnell and his members will have to withstand a White House campaign to impose public pressure on a prompt vetting and vote on Garland. Already New Hampshire’s Kelly Ayotte and Illinois’s Mark Kirk, two of McConnell’s most vulnerable members, have said they would be open to meeting with Garland. And Maine’s Susan Collins and outgoing Indiana Sen. Dan Coats, who was two of seven sitting Republican senators who voted for Garland back in 1997, have both said they’d like to seeing confirmation hearings, if not a vote. But a recent NBC/Wall Street Journal poll found that 48% of Americans would like to see the Senate act on Obama’s nominee and 37% wanted to wait after the election. That is hardly an enormous public outcry that might force McConnell’s hand. That’s why the most likely route for Garland to take a place on the court is the Senate’s lame duck session after the November elections, if Democrats win the White House, the Senate or both. Part of the problem in the Senate is personal: Republicans are still smarting that Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid in 2013, when he was then majority leader, changed the Senate rules to make it harder for the minority to filibuster certain judicial nominees. “Why would we trust them after they invoked the nuclear option and blew up the Senate in order to allow President Obama to stack the courts,” Senator Lindsey Graham said on Monday. With things so acrimonious on the Hill—Republican intransigence threatens to bring Senate proceedings to a standstill—little is likely to happen before the election. But, once the election is over, all bets are off. In the scenario where Hillary Clinton wins the White House or Republicans lose the Senate, Senate sources on both sides of the aisle say there will be a strong impetus to confirm Garland in a lame duck session. After all, Garland would probably be more moderate than whomever Clinton might nominate. And he’s one of the oldest nominees in recent history. Not since Richard Nixon nominated Lewis Powell in the early 1970’s has someone at that age—Powell was 64, Garland is 63—been nominated. His time on the bench will be considered more limited than if the nominee had been 49-year-old federal judge Sri Srinivasan, who was also on Obama’s shortlist. ## Transcript [ MUSIC ] I've selected a nominee who is widely recognized not only as one of America's sharpest legal minds, but someone who brings to his work a spirit of decency, modesty, integrity, evenhandedness, and excellence. [ MUSIC ] Fidelity to the Constitution and the law has been the cornerstone of my professional life. [ MUSIC ] President has every right to put a nominee up. The Senate has every right not to consider a nominee [ MUSIC ] And there is a presidence. [ MUSIC ] [ BLANK_AUDIO ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/"},"headline":"Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck","datePublished":"2016-03-16T17:24:06.000Z","dateModified":"2026-10-05T08:49:44.911Z","description":"The Republicans dig in","url":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/","keywords":["Supreme Court","Senate","White House","Merrick Garland"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecd289dde913f77b/69888b37196cf4078a03ac4c/obama-merrick-biden.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jay Newton-Small","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jay-newton-small/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltecd289dde913f77b/69888b37196cf4078a03ac4c/obama-merrick-biden.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Barack Obama, Merrick Garland","caption":"Barack Obama, Merrick Garland","creditText":"Pablo Martinez Monsivais—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/supreme-court/","name":"Supreme Court"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/","name":"Merrick Garland's Best Shot at Confirmation: Lame Duck"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Know Right Now: Obama Chooses Supreme Court Nominee","description":"","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/bYNSBUhN/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-03-16T16:07:27.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/bYNSBUhN.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/","duration":"PT1M1S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4261457/merrick-garland-supreme-court-senate-2/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```