--- title: Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety description: 'Apple is not fighting for privacy; it’s fighting for profit' canonical: https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-03-17T11:00:45.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:56:05.643Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety og:description: 'Apple is not fighting for privacy; it’s fighting for profit' og:url: https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33e85557935cac4e/69888b2d2dce013a559e835f/tom-cotton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4000 og:image:height: 2250 og:image:alt: Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton Interview og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety twitter:description: 'Apple is not fighting for privacy; it’s fighting for profit' twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33e85557935cac4e/69888b2d2dce013a559e835f/tom-cotton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=08518941-dda7-4486-8112-89767c4f2fff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=08518941-dda7-4486-8112-89767c4f2fff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=08518941-dda7-4486-8112-89767c4f2fff&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Know Right Now: Apple Refuses to Share San Bernardino Shooter’s iPhone Info [Watch (HLS stream): Know Right Now: Apple Refuses to Share San Bernardino Shooter’s iPhone Info](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/JHyWU9Ub.m3u8) (1:01)  _Published 2016-02-17. Apple will resist a federal court order to hack into an iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters_ by [Sen. Tom Cotton](https://time.com/author/tom-cotton/) ## Sen. Tom Cotton Mar 17, 2016 11:00 AM UTC  Thomas Cotton during an interview in Washington, DC on March 17, 2015. Thomas Cotton during an interview in Washington, DC on March 17, 2015. Andrew Harrer—Bloomberg/Getty Images by [Sen. Tom Cotton](https://time.com/author/tom-cotton/) ## Sen. Tom Cotton Mar 17, 2016 11:00 AM UTC Apple CEO Tim Cook recently [explained](http://time.com/4232194/apple-tim-cook-email-fbi/) his decision to refuse a court order to unlock the iPhone of a deceased ISIS terrorist. He stated that what’s “at stake is the data security of hundreds of millions of law-abiding people, and setting a dangerous precedent that threatens everyone’s civil liberties.” But Cook is wrong, and the implications of his error will be grave. What’s really at stake is the future of our ability to keep Americans safe. Last December terrorist attackers in San Bernardino pledged allegiance to ISIS and unleashed a killing spree leaving 14 dead and 22 injured. It was a stark reminder that our enemies around the world seek to harm us. But it also reflected an important shift in the type of terrorist threats America faces. For the last 15 years, the excellent work of our Intelligence Community and other law-enforcement officials has prevented another large-scale terrorist attack like we saw on Sept. 11, 2001\. As we’ve thwarted attack after attack though, terrorists have adapted their methodology. Today, few terrorist organizations still employ the “al-Qaeda model” in which individuals travel to terrorist training camps overseas and then are deployed to the West to inflict atrocities. Instead, our enemies use social media to recruit individuals in Western nations and then shift their communications and data storage to encrypted devices and applications. Under the cover of encryption, terror masterminds provide recruits with the tactics and tools necessary to carry out attacks using small arms and explosives. None of this requires any overseas travel. The use of encrypted communication and data storage to shield terrorist coordination from intelligence and law-enforcement authorities is known as “going dark.” And now Apple is denying the FBI the ability to shine a flashlight into that darkness. Despite Cook’s protestations, Apple has no legal basis to refuse a lawful court order to unlock a terrorist’s iPhone. The FBI is asking Apple to disable one iPhone’s “self-destruct” mechanism that wipes the phone’s memory if a passcode is entered incorrectly too many times. Apple previously had the ability to easily unlock iPhones with older versions of Apple’s mobile operating system. Indeed, in 70 prior cases, Apple assisted the FBI in unlocking iPhones pursuant to valid warrants issued for bona fide investigations. What’s changed? Apparently Apple’s marketing strategy did. Apple built its latest mobile operating system to be more resistant to such unlocking. And late last year, Apple broke with its past practice when it objected to a different court order to unlock an iPhone with its older operating system—the exact system it had helped unlock in the past. Apple argued in open court that complying with the order would “tarnish the Apple brand,” which is now apparently premised on purposely engineering its products so it is difficult or impossible for Apple to cooperate with law enforcement. In short, Apple says it can no longer cooperate with investigations because it’s now the business model of Apple to thwart these investigations. Apple is not fighting for privacy; it’s fighting for profit. But an Edward Snowden-driven marketing strategy doesn’t exempt Apple from its duties as an American company under the law. The FBI’s request in this case is not different from other investigative searches approved by courts under Fourth Amendment. The request is limited to this particular investigation, and does not affect the privacy of Americans. On the contrary, if Apple succeeds, the implications will be broad and dire. It will make clear to all terrorists—as well as pedophiles, child pornographers, and drug traffickers—that the products of Apple and other companies that follow Apple’s lead will enjoy special immunity from lawful investigations. Terrorists and criminals will feel free to plot, organize, and instigate through their iPhones, iPads, and MacBooks because Apple will protect its brand more than our safety and security. Cook was correct when he wrote to his employees that “our country has always been strongest when we come together.” But Mr. Cook’s decision to create and defend a zone of impunity for terrorists and then demagoge about a fantasy Orwellian surveillance state to smear his critics is the exact opposite of coming together. It’s a profit-driven stance that uses hyperbole and scare tactics to divide the country and mask what are only recent changes in Apple’s marketing strategy and technology. If “coming together” means anything, it means that a U.S. company should obey the law. It means a company should follow years of its own past practice of complying with court orders. And it means that a company shouldn’t shirk the duties of citizenship expected of all Americans. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/"},"headline":"Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety","datePublished":"2016-03-17T11:00:45.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:56:05.643Z","description":"'Apple is not fighting for privacy; it’s fighting for profit'","url":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/","keywords":["National Security","Tech","Law"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33e85557935cac4e/69888b2d2dce013a559e835f/tom-cotton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Sen. Tom Cotton","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/tom-cotton/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt33e85557935cac4e/69888b2d2dce013a559e835f/tom-cotton.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton Interview","caption":"Arkansas Republican Senator Tom Cotton Interview","creditText":"Andrew Harrer—Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/national-security/","name":"National Security"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/","name":"Sen. Cotton: Apple’s Brand Is Not Worth America's Safety"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Know Right Now: Apple Refuses to Share San Bernardino Shooter’s iPhone Info","description":"Apple will resist a federal court order to hack into an iPhone belonging to one of the San Bernardino shooters","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/JHyWU9Ub/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2016-02-17T14:43:58.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/JHyWU9Ub.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/","duration":"PT1M1S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4252691/apple-brand-national-security/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```