--- title: Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control description: This is one obvious step we can take to lower health-care spending canonical: https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2016-01-14T16:38:14.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T14:08:04.246Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control og:description: This is one obvious step we can take to lower health-care spending og:url: https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control twitter:description: This is one obvious step we can take to lower health-care spending twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=385f922c-b66c-41b0-8f2f-ef23c42079fd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=385f922c-b66c-41b0-8f2f-ef23c42079fd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=385f922c-b66c-41b0-8f2f-ef23c42079fd&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Jeffrey A. Singer](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-a-singer/) ## Jeffrey A. Singer Jan 14, 2016 4:38 PM UTC by [Jeffrey A. Singer](https://time.com/author/jeffrey-a-singer/) ## Jeffrey A. Singer Jan 14, 2016 4:38 PM UTC This year marks the first year that women in [Oregon](http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/01/04/health/birth-control-oregon-contraception.html?%5Fr=0)—and soon in California—will no longer have to make an appointment with their primary care provider in order to receive a prescription for hormonal birth control pills. They will be able to obtain them directly from their pharmacist. This is an important step forward in liberating women from the paternalistic policy of essentially making them pay a toll—a doctor’s office visit—for contraception. This added expense and inconvenience drives some women to forgo oral contraceptives and often resort to less desirable methods or no contraception at all. Ironically, emergency contraceptive or “morning after” pills are available over the counter without a prescription. It would be wrong to blame the medical profession for advocating this policy as a way to generate fees. For years, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology has recommended that oral contraceptives be made available over the counter. The college’s Committee on Clinical Gynecology [reiterated this position](http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Over-the-Counter-Access-to-Oral-Contraceptives) in 2012\. And this view is shared by 76% of physicians, according to a [2015 survey](http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26549241) by the University of California San Diego and UC San Francisco. While all over-the-counter medications, from non-steroidal anti-inflammatories to antihistamines to acetaminophen, carry risks of side effects and other dangerous unintended consequences, experience has shown that proper warning and education have worked in minimizing abuse and misuse of these products, and there is no reason to think that the same won’t apply to birth control pills. In fact, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology cited, among other studies, a [2006 report from Seattle](http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010782405004798) showing women’s self-evaluation regarding whether or not they should take the pill matched those of doctors about 90% of the time—and that the 10% of the time that they didn’t match was mostly because the women erred on the side of caution. Many argue that not requiring a doctor’s visit would mean women would not obtain necessary preventative care. But, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology [states](http://www.acog.org/Resources-And-Publications/Committee-Opinions/Committee-on-Gynecologic-Practice/Over-the-Counter-Access-to-Oral-Contraceptives): “Cervical cancer screening or sexually transmitted infection (STI) screening is not required for initiating OC \[oral contraceptive\] use and should not be used as barriers to access.” In fact, there is currently a debate among gynecologists regarding the need and benefits of annual pap exams. Besides, this argument is blatantly sexist. Men are not required to get a doctor’s prescription for condoms as a way of making sure they get a prostate exam. Adults are perfectly capable of making their own preventative health decisions, and the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology concurs with this viewpoint. In Oregon and California the new laws require women to obtain a prescription from a pharmacist. The pharmacists require the women to fill out a questionnaire and have their blood pressure checked. The Oregon law passed last summer. The California law passed in [2013](http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2015/06/05/412226430/california-women-can-soon-go-right-to-the-pharmacist-for-birth-control), but it has taken a while for the various state licensing boards to settle their turf battles and decide upon which and how California pharmacists can prescribe. While these laws are a big step in the right direction, they don’t go far enough. They only replace one barrier with another. Ideally, women should not need a prescription from a pharmacist for oral contraceptives—just like they don’t need one for the “morning after” pill. But that would require action by the Food and Drug Administration or Congress. Currently, women enjoy that freedom in [102 countries](http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/over-the-counter-birth-control%5F568c5fdae4b0a2b6fb6dc14a). It is debatable as to how many unwanted pregnancies would be prevented by making birth control pills available over the counter. What is not debatable is that there will be a lot less spending on unwanted—and unnecessary—visits to the doctor’s office in order to get a prescription. Bypassing the tollbooth of the doctor’s office is one obvious step we can take to lower health-care spending. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/"},"headline":"Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control","datePublished":"2016-01-14T16:38:14.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T14:08:04.246Z","description":"This is one obvious step we can take to lower health-care spending","url":"https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/","keywords":["health","politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Jeffrey A. Singer","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/jeffrey-a-singer/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4180612/birth-control-prescriptions/","name":"Women Should Not Have to Visit a Doctor for Birth Control"}}]}] ```