--- title: Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive description: What's the point of a liberal arts education if the only ideas expressed are ones with which we already agree? canonical: https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/ author: Beni Snow article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-11-12T21:40:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:57:11.194Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive og:description: If we stop open discussion of ideas, progress becomes impossible og:url: https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3905f875196b4183/698870b7a988cae9b96b5412/holding-blank-sign.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 5099 og:image:height: 2868 og:image:alt: holding-blank-sign og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive twitter:description: If we stop open discussion of ideas, progress becomes impossible twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3905f875196b4183/698870b7a988cae9b96b5412/holding-blank-sign.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d2eb111-1b31-471e-8669-09fe9682d9b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=8d2eb111-1b31-471e-8669-09fe9682d9b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=8d2eb111-1b31-471e-8669-09fe9682d9b4&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: Obama on free speech [Watch (HLS stream): Obama on free speech](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/jvXPA2P4.m3u8) (0:21)  _Published 2015-01-21. Obama on free speech_ by [Beni Snow](https://time.com/author/beni-snow/) ## Beni Snow Nov 12, 2015 9:40 PM UTC  Man holding blank sign in field. Man holding blank sign in field. Getty Images by [Beni Snow](https://time.com/author/beni-snow/) ## Beni Snow Nov 12, 2015 9:40 PM UTC You may have heard about Erika and Nicholas Christakis, the associate master and master of Yale’s Silliman College. A few days before Halloween, The Yale Intercultural Affairs Committee sent an email containing [guidelines](https://www.thefire.org/email-from-intercultural-affairs/) on how students should dress to avoid wearing costumes that may contain offensive stereotypes. In response to the guidelines, Erika Christakis sent an [email](https://www.thefire.org/email-from-erika-christakis-dressing-yourselves-email-to-silliman-college-yale-students-on-halloween-costumes/) describing her and her husband’s reservations about the university telling students what they should wear and how they should express themselves. Following that email, the Christakises have been confronted by [mobs](https://www.youtube.com/watch?list=PLvIqJIL2kOMefn77xg6-6yrvek5kbNf3Z&v=NoxJKmuoBmE) of students denouncing their statement. Nicholas Christakis is an eminent sociologist and was named to TIME Magazine’s list of most influential people, yet he is facing calls to resign over an email that dared to declare that “Free speech and the ability to tolerate offence are the hallmarks of a free and open society.” When students actively stifle debate, proclaim that a university’s purpose is “[not about creating an intellectual space](https://www.thefire.org/yale-students-demand-resignations-from-faculty-members-over-halloween-email/)” and argue that the Christakis’ opinion is not worth listening to, any shred of the intellectualism that should be the foundation of education is lost. This is just the latest in a series of controversies revolving around two competing ideals: the right of free speech and the right to not be offended. I believe that the so-called right to not be offended loses every time. Are there Halloween costumes that are offensive? Absolutely. Would I ever consider wearing one of them? Never. But, to paraphrase a well-known biographer of Voltaire, although I may disagree with your offensive outfit, I nonetheless support your right to be offensive. The ideal of free speech, even offensive free speech, is necessary for an open society. Whether it involves college students wearing offensive costumes or a neo-Nazis group’s desire to [march together in public](https://www.aclu.org/aclu-history-taking-stand-free-speech-skokie), free speech is essential, even if it can be difficult to tolerate. If we stop open discussion of ideas, even ideas that offend, progress becomes impossible. Offensive costumes are a legitimate form of expression, and no one should have the authority to regulate what someone says or what they wear, no matter how insensitive. Many, if not most, students will never consider wearing offensive costumes, any more than they would express patently offensive ideas. However, if they chose to take that path, it is theirs to take. Their freedom to express offensive ideas and stereotypes needs to be protected, no matter how unpopular. As Erika Christakis wrote in her email, “American universities were once a safe space not only for maturation but also for a certain regressive, or even transgressive, experience; increasingly, it seems, they have become places of censure and prohibition.” This censorship worries me far more than any racially or ethnically offensive expression ever will. Unlike most censorship, which can be thought of as “top-down,” i.e. the authority policing the thoughts of the populace, this particularly worrying form of anti-intellectualism is “bottom-up.” This phenomenon of “bottom-up” censorship is incredibly dangerous, since it only allows the forms of expression that mob rule allow. Who is to say what forms of expression the majority will want to ban tomorrow? When Alabama Governor George Wallace refused to protect the rights of civil rights protesters during the famous Selma Marches in 1965, President Lyndon Johnson stepped up and ordered the army to protect those protesters’ right to express their beliefs. Most people in Alabama did not agree with what those protesters had to say, yet the president felt strongly enough about their freedom of expression that he deployed the U.S. military. If speech that diverged from what is thought of as “correct” were to have been banned in Alabama in 1965, the civil rights marchers would never have taken their first step. Many people believed that civil rights were abhorrent, unnatural and Biblically forbidden. Of course, we now view those people as the bigots, but at the time, if the majority had silenced the minority, then the civil rights story would have had a very different end. I hate to draw a comparison between civil rights, something I wholly support, and insensitive clothing choices, which I do not, but that is the whole point: it is not about whether I support it or not. It is not about whether the speaker is “right” or not. We cannot pick and choose what forms of expression are allowed. Yale’s own students have taken it upon themselves to label certain ideas as beyond the pale of contemplation, and anyone who dares to express these ideas as not meriting to remain employed. These students, who I assume are outspoken proponents of diversity, have forgotten one of the most essential aspects of diversity: diversity of thought. The ideal of free speech is not to protect speech that everyone agrees with, but to protect speech that offends. After all, what is the point of a liberal arts education if the only ideas that can be expressed are ones with which we already agree? _Beni Snow is a freshman at Princeton University. This_ [_article_](http://dailyprincetonian.com/opinion/2015/11/in-the-defense-of-the-christakises/) _originally appeared on_ [_The Daily Princetonian_](http://dailyprincetonian.com/) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/"},"headline":"Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive","datePublished":"2015-11-12T21:40:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:57:11.194Z","description":"What's the point of a liberal arts education if the only ideas expressed are ones with which we already agree?","url":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/","keywords":["society","Culture","halloween"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3905f875196b4183/698870b7a988cae9b96b5412/holding-blank-sign.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Beni Snow","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/beni-snow/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt3905f875196b4183/698870b7a988cae9b96b5412/holding-blank-sign.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"holding-blank-sign","caption":"holding-blank-sign","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/society/","name":"society"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/","name":"Princeton Student: We Have a Right to Be Offensive"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Obama on free speech","description":"Obama on free speech","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/jvXPA2P4/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-01-21T03:32:08.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/jvXPA2P4.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/","duration":"PT21S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4109987/freedom-speech-princeton/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```