--- title: Democratic Debate Strategy Spat Breaks Into Public Fight description: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard criticized the Democratic party leader for limiting debates, saying Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown “poor judgment.” canonical: https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/ author: Sam Frizell article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-10-14T00:24:42.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:41:50.173Z article:section: Politics og:title: Democratic Debate Strategy Spat Breaks Into Public Fight og:description: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard criticized the Democratic party leader for limiting debates, saying Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown “poor judgment.” og:url: https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt55bb77f5fec9e9f6/6988680dab6d7718816a6a78/demo-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=900&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 900 og:image:height: 506 og:image:alt: DEMO-DEBATE og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Democratic Debate Strategy Spat Breaks Into Public Fight twitter:description: Rep. Tulsi Gabbard criticized the Democratic party leader for limiting debates, saying Debbie Wasserman Schultz has shown “poor judgment.” twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt55bb77f5fec9e9f6/6988680dab6d7718816a6a78/demo-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=900&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # DNC Vice Chair: Democratic Leader Showed 'Poor Judgment' On Debates > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=b1bb3209-0cb5-4ab9-8872-1cc884e82aad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=b1bb3209-0cb5-4ab9-8872-1cc884e82aad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=b1bb3209-0cb5-4ab9-8872-1cc884e82aad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=b1bb3209-0cb5-4ab9-8872-1cc884e82aad&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) ## Video: Hillary Clinton's Top 10 Political Moments [Watch (HLS stream): Hillary Clinton's Top 10 Political Moments](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/L3I0gpwt.m3u8) (1:49)  _Published 2015-04-09. Watch the top 10 moments from Hillary Clinton's career in politics._ by [Sam Frizell](https://time.com/author/sam-frizell/) ## Sam Frizell Oct 14, 2015 12:24 AM UTC  Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Martin O'Malley Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Martin O'Malley Michael Dwyer—AP; Charlie Neibergall—AP: Bloomberg/Getty Images by [Sam Frizell](https://time.com/author/sam-frizell/) ## Sam Frizell Oct 14, 2015 12:24 AM UTC As Democratic candidates gathered for the first 2016 Presidential debate, divisions within party leadership over the debate plan have broken into public view. Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, a vice chair of the party, said in an interview Tuesday with TIME that party chair Debbie Wasserman-Schulz had shown “poor judgement” with her heavy-handed leadership and debate strategy. Earlier this week, Wasserman Schultz encouraged Gabbard to stay away from debate in Vegas because of disagreements over how many debates Democrats should stage. “We’re the Democratic Party,” Gabbard continued. “We should be representing democratic values and allowing for debate both within our party and amongst our member and officers.” Gabbard, who is one of five vice-chairs of the Democratic National Committee, has openly criticized the party’s policy of restricting the number of debates to six. The [New York Times](http://www.nytimes.com/politics/first-draft/2015/10/12/d-n-c-officer-says-she-was-disinvited-from-debate-after-calling-for-more-of-them/) first reported Gabbard’s claim that after appearing on television days before the first contest criticizing the debate schedule, Wasserman Schultz disinvited her from the debate. Gabbard said in her interview with TIME that Wasserman Schultz’s staff had called her staff, telling her she was no longer invited to the CNN-hosted contest in Las Vegas. The debates, Gabbard told TIME, are “not something people should play politics with.” The DNC disagreed with Gabbard’s assessment. “The focus of the debate in Nevada as well as the other debates and forums in the coming weeks should be on the candidates who will take the stage, and their vision to move America forward,” Holly Shulman, national press secretary for the DNC said in a statement to TIME. “All that was asked of Ms. Gabbard’s staff was to prioritize our candidates and this important opportunity they have to introduce themselves to the American people.” Wasserman Schultz said Tuesday that she reached out to Gabbard multiple times after the initial exchange to discuss attending the Las Vegas debate. The controversy over the number of debates has widened in recent months after it became clear that Wasserman Schultz unilaterally made the decision to limit the number of debates. The party has come under fire from the progressive base, as well as candidates Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley. Wasserman Schultz and others have defended the debate schedule, saying it has been necessary to limit the number of debates in order to prevent the schedule from over burdening the candidates. There were over twenty debates in 2008\. The DNC also points to the Republicans’ rules, which limit the number of debates to nine. The interview with Gabbard below has been edited and condensed for clarity. **TIME: What happened between you and DNC chair Wasserman Schultz?** Representative Tulsi Gabbard: Last week I was on MSNBC publicly calling for more debates, as I have been for several weeks. Debbie Wasserman Schultz’s chief of staff called mine and delivered a message saying, ‘We heard her on MSNBC, she’s continuing to disagree and therefore Debbie doesn’t feel she should come to the debate.’ **What are your concerns about the debate schedule?** Really, this goes to the heart of the whole issue here, which is about democracy and freedom of speech. People’s ability to participate in the democratic process is something I take very seriously. These aren’t things that people should take lightly and it’s not something people should play politics with. There’s a bigger issue here than me missing the debate. The bigger issue is the unilateral decision that the chairwoman made with regard to our presidential candidates: setting the policy of not only limiting the schedule to six debates, but the policy of retribution that if you participate in debates not sanctioned, then you’ll be punished. That’s a problem. **Do you think DWS penalizing chairs similar to issue of limiting debate?** Both decisions are examples of poor judgment on her part. We’re the Democratic Party. We should be representing democratic values and allowing for debate both within our party and amongst our member and officers and debate and disagreements opening up more opportunities for American people to be informed and engaged. This situation with the debates in particular and the fact that it was made unilaterally without communicating or consulting with us. As a vice chair, I can say there was no meeting of the officers of DNC to go through this important and decision before it was made. This is a particularly problematic issue because it goes to the very heart of democratic values and what we are supposed to be working for as a party, and within our democracy. **You’re watching the debate remotely, then?** It’ll be interesting to see how the debate goes. This will be a good example of why we’ll need more opportunities to engage with the candidates. ## Transcript You know, I'm not sittin' here some little woman standing here by my man like Tammy Wynette. I'm sittin' here because I love him, and I respect him. Now is our chance to beat the historical odds, and give the American people the health security they need. If there is one message that echoes forth from this. Let it be that human rights are women's rights and women's rights are human rights once and for all. The great story here for anybody willing to find it and write about it and explain it is this vast right- wing conspiracy that has been conspiring. Against my husband since the day he announced for president. I would be happy to, when you give me the signed letters. Well, right here. Right here. When you give me. Right here. Sign it right now. We'll shake. We'll shake on this, Ray. No, no, I want your signature, cause I think that everybody wants to see you signing something that you said you were for. You know, I have so many opportunities from this country. I just don't wanna see us fall backwards. Although we weren't able to shatter that highest, hardest glass ceiling this time, thanks to you, it's got about 18 million cracks in it. The battle to stop Al Qaeda and its affiliates. Does not end with one death. What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator. I took the unprecedented step of asking that the state department make all my work- related emails, [ MUSIC ] Public for everyone to see. [ NOISE ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/"},"headline":"DNC Vice Chair: Democratic Leader Showed 'Poor Judgment' On Debates","datePublished":"2015-10-14T00:24:42.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:41:50.173Z","description":"A poorly timed division among senior party leaders threatens to put a damper on the party's first debate","url":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/","keywords":["Debates","2016 Election","DNC","debbie wasserman schultz","Democratic National Committee"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt55bb77f5fec9e9f6/6988680dab6d7718816a6a78/demo-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Sam Frizell","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/sam-frizell/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt55bb77f5fec9e9f6/6988680dab6d7718816a6a78/demo-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"DEMO-DEBATE","caption":"Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, Martin O'Malley","creditText":"Michael Dwyer—AP; Charlie Neibergall—AP: Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/debates/","name":"Debates"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/","name":"DNC Vice Chair: Democratic Leader Showed 'Poor Judgment' On Debates"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Hillary Clinton's Top 10 Political Moments","description":"Watch the top 10 moments from Hillary Clinton's career in politics.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/L3I0gpwt/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-04-09T19:18:36.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/L3I0gpwt.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/","duration":"PT1M49S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4072459/democratic-debate-dnc-tulsi-gabbard-debbie-wasserman/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```