--- title: Education: Focus on 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students description: It hides the larger issue of inequality in education canonical: https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-10-13T14:16:11.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-07-09T08:19:50.528Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Focusing on the 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students og:description: It hides the larger issue of inequality in education og:url: https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt711fe0844cb7d156/698867e30b72e32a7b6e646e/classroom-children-students-raising-hands.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 6048 og:image:height: 3402 og:image:alt: classroom-children-students-raising-hands og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Focusing on the 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students twitter:description: It hides the larger issue of inequality in education twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt711fe0844cb7d156/698867e30b72e32a7b6e646e/classroom-children-students-raising-hands.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Focusing on the 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4ec4cb44-7944-4104-aa53-4bccd8b62f0e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4ec4cb44-7944-4104-aa53-4bccd8b62f0e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=4ec4cb44-7944-4104-aa53-4bccd8b62f0e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=4ec4cb44-7944-4104-aa53-4bccd8b62f0e&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) by [Molly McManus, University of Texas at Austin / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/molly-mcmanus/) ## Molly McManus, University of Texas at Austin / The Conversation Oct 13, 2015 2:16 PM UTC  Elementary Students Elementary Students Getty Images by [Molly McManus, University of Texas at Austin / The Conversation](https://time.com/author/molly-mcmanus/) ## Molly McManus, University of Texas at Austin / The Conversation Oct 13, 2015 2:16 PM UTC Why do rich kids end up [doing better](http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/education/education-gap-grows-between-rich-and-poor-studies-show.html?%5Fr=0) than poor kids in school? Of late, one common explanation for this has been the “word gap,” or the idea that [poor children](https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/TheEarlyCatastrophe.pdf) are exposed to significantly fewer words by age 3 than their wealthier peers. As a former elementary school teacher and now educational psychologist, I understand the appeal of the “word gap” argument. But, focusing on the “word gap” as an explanation for the [achievement gap](http://edr.sagepub.com/content/35/7/3.abstract) between poor students and wealthier students is both distracting and potentially harmful. Such an explanation could allow educators at all levels to both deny and widen this real gap that exists between the rich and the poor kids. **What is the ‘word gap’?** A [study](https://books.google.com/books/about/Meaningful%5Fdifferences%5Fin%5Fthe%5Feveryday%5Fe.html?id=I2pHAAAAMAAJ) conducted more than 30 years ago first came up with findings that showed there was a “word gap” between children from low-income homes and children from economically advantaged ones. For this study, researchers entered the homes of 42 families over a span of four years to assess daily language exchanges between parents and their young children. The researchers found that, by age 3, children with high-income families were exposed to 30 million more words than children with families on welfare. The study was subsequently [critiqued](http://www.susanblum.com/uploads/4/7/2/1/4721639/jla%5F-%5Flanguage%5Fgap%5Fforum%5F2015.pdf) for its flawed research methodology as well as [biased assumptions](http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/JME-12-2014-0044?journalCode=jme) about families of color and families coping with financial crisis. However, in the last three years the idea of a “word gap” between advantaged and disadvantaged kids has gained extraordinary public exposure. References to the word gap can now be seen almost weekly in widely circulated publications. Headlines like “[Poor Kids and the ‘Word Gap’](http://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2014/10/american-kids-are-starving-for-words/381552/),” “[How do you make a baby smart?](http://hechingerreport.org/make-baby-smart-word-word-chicago-project-says/),” “[Mind the Word Gap](http://www.npr.org/2014/09/26/351810058/mind-the-word-gap%20),” “[The famous ‘word gap’ doesn’t hurt only the young. It affects many educators, too.](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2015/02/16/the-famous-word-gap-doesnt-hurt-only-the-young-it-affects-many-educators-too/)” and “[The Early Catastrophe: The 30 Million Word Gap by Age 3](https://www.aft.org/sites/default/files/periodicals/TheEarlyCatastrophe.pdf)” are now quite common. From a place of relative obscurity, the study has now become the “evidence-based” foundation for [countless](http://www.providencetalks.org/) [initiatives](http://dph.georgia.gov/blog/2013-12-20/talk-town-new-language-program-wins-united-way-grant) [and programs](http://talkingisteaching.org/) working to improve the academic achievement of poor children. I agree that the idea is tempting to embrace, especially when it has received support from high-profile organizations like the [Clinton Foundation’s Too Small to Fail](https://www.clintonfoundation.org/our-work/too-small-fail), [The University of Chicago, School of Medicine’s Thirty Million Words® Initiative](http://tmw.org/) and even [The White House](https://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2014/06/25/empowering-our-children-bridging-word-gap). But the attention being paid to “word gap” is harmful. **Why is the ‘word gap’ harmful?** Students living in poverty currently comprise [more than one-half](http://www.southerneducation.org/getattachment/4ac62e27-5260-47a5-9d02-14896ec3a531/A-New-Majority-2015-Update-Low-Income-Students-Now.aspx) of the public school population. Meanwhile, the test-score gap between the most disadvantaged children (those in the bottom 10% of the income distribution) and children from wealthy families (those in the top 10%) has [expanded by 30% to 40% over the last three decades](http://cepa.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/reardon%20whither%20opportunity%20-%20chapter%205.pdf). Unfortunately, the focus on the “word gap” takes teachers and other educators away from thinking about how to address the larger issue of inequality in education. Instead, it focuses attention on what children do not have in terms of an arbitrary [word count](http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jola.12071/pdf). Following the “word gap” logic, teachers often view vocabulary building as the most important aspect of education. However, in reality, there is a wide scope of early learning experiences that all young children, particularly those experiencing poverty, need to develop. For example, approaches such as [project-based learning](http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/10508406.1998.9672056) provide students the opportunity to engage with complex topics and construct their own knowledge in addition to developing vocabulary. Moreover, when we use the “word gap” to identify poor children as behind before they even begin school, that affects their [teachers’ view](http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/L/bo3684193.html) of what they are capable of doing. It directs attention toward the things that poor families do not have and [cannot offer](http://www.learninglandscapes.ca/images/documents/ll-no13/michaels.pdf) their young children. [Research](http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=10699) shows that teachers of poor students and/or students of color often dwell on the experiences and language that their students are missing and default to teaching practices such as vocabulary drills and rote repetition that emphasize obedience and quiet behavior. Not only do these types of learning experiences [limit students’ opportunities to develop language](http://hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-84-number-2/herarticle/agency-and-expanding-capabilities-in-early-grade-c), they also negatively affect [students’ views](http://knowledge.sagepub.com/view/diversityineducation/n191.xml) of themselves as learners. Poor students are made to feel less capable because of what they do not know. Because of the “word gap” and [other widespread assumptions](http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S1532771XJLE0102%5F2) grounded in [deficit thinking](https://books.google.com/books?id=2gvVi8%5FBesMC&dq=iq+testing+deficit+thinking)– the idea that low-income minority students fail in school because they and their families have deficiencies – many teachers are not tapping into the [strengths and rich experiences](http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00405849209543534) that their students bring to school. Consequently, they deny students the types learning experiences that allow them to explore, talk and collaborate. Finally, the “word gap” sends a message to poor parents and parents of color that there is [something wrong](http://parenting.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/09/20/are-poor-parents-poorer-at-parenting/) with their parenting if it is different from the practices of affluent, white parents. It unfairly takes the onus off of schools and teachers to provide sophisticated learning opportunities in which their students can excel and places the [blame](http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/dec/11/nicholas-kristof-education-disability) for failure squarely on parents’ shoulders. As a result, poor parents and parents of color are viewed as [less capable](https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2013/10/28/five-stereotypes-about-poor-families-and-education/) because of what they do not know, just like their children. **The learning experience gap** Low-income children are more likely than their higher-income peers to be in [factory-like](http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED365474) classrooms that allow little interaction and physical movement. As a result, these children spend more time sitting, following directions and listening rather than [discussing, debating, solving problems and sharing ideas](http://hepg.org/her-home/issues/harvard-educational-review-volume-84-number-2/herarticle/agency-and-expanding-capabilities-in-early-grade-c). Focusing on the “word gap” further perpetuates these problematic learning opportunities and deprives children of the types of learning experiences required to develop a range of sophisticated capabilities. I believe that most parents, regardless of circumstance, would also agree that it is important to engage in conversation with their young children. However, early conversations and exposure to words will not determine whether a child does well in school. Furthermore, poverty is not an indication that parents are not speaking to their young children. The academic disparity between young children in poverty and children from wealthier families is not a result of what their parents can offer. It is a result of the different types of learning experiences they are afforded at school. In other words, it is not the “word gap” but the opportunity gap that is the problem. _This_ [_article_](https://theconversation.com/are-some-kids-really-smarter-just-because-they-know-more-words-47819) _originally appeared on_ [_The Conversation_](http://theconversation.com) ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/"},"headline":"Focusing on the 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students","datePublished":"2015-10-13T14:16:11.000Z","dateModified":"2026-07-09T08:19:50.528Z","description":"It hides the larger issue of inequality in education","url":"https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/","keywords":["Education","Children"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt711fe0844cb7d156/698867e30b72e32a7b6e646e/classroom-children-students-raising-hands.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Molly McManus, University of Texas at Austin / The Conversation"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt711fe0844cb7d156/698867e30b72e32a7b6e646e/classroom-children-students-raising-hands.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"classroom-children-students-raising-hands","caption":"classroom-children-students-raising-hands","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/education/","name":"Education"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4069992/word-gap-education/","name":"Focusing on the 'Word Gap' Is Harmful to Poor Students"}}]}] ```