--- title: Those Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good description: Two new studies add to growing skepticism over whether older adults should increase calcium intake in order to prevent osteoporosis and risk for bone fractures. canonical: https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/ author: Alexandra Sifferlin article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-09-29T22:30:23.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:57:39.104Z article:section: Health og:title: Those Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good og:description: Two new studies add to growing skepticism over whether older adults should increase calcium intake in order to prevent osteoporosis and risk for bone fractures. og:url: https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt94eae3d610baf290/698865f3a988ca6eb56b495e/strong.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4080 og:image:height: 2295 og:image:alt: 480815157 og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Those Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good twitter:description: Two new studies add to growing skepticism over whether older adults should increase calcium intake in order to prevent osteoporosis and risk for bone fractures. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt94eae3d610baf290/698865f3a988ca6eb56b495e/strong.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good, Studies Say > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5b99b9d0-5285-44f0-a47c-0d4488a204b7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=5b99b9d0-5285-44f0-a47c-0d4488a204b7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=5b99b9d0-5285-44f0-a47c-0d4488a204b7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ## Video: Should I Drink Nonfat Half-And-Half? [Watch (HLS stream): Should I Drink Nonfat Half-And-Half?](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/OXuvbc41.m3u8) (1:28)  _Published 2015-04-16. Whether you're wondering about the health benefits (or harms) of fat-free half-and-half, or simply wondering what it is, here's why all five of our health experts this week warned against it._ by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Sep 29, 2015 10:30 PM UTC  Strong man with mustache holding barbell above head Strong man with mustache holding barbell above head Getty Images by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Sep 29, 2015 10:30 PM UTC Two new studies published Tuesday in the journal _The BMJ_ add to growing skepticism over whether older adults should increase calcium via supplements in order to prevent osteoporosis and risk for bone fractures. For older adults, a daily intake of 1,000 to 1,200 mg of calcium has long been recommended. But the two papers, written by the same team of New Zealand researchers, find little evidence to support the recommendations. Recent concerns over calcium intake have emerged, suggesting that “small reductions in total fractures seem outweighed by the moderate risk of minor side effects,” the study authors write. Those side effects can include constipation as well as more severe complications, like cardiovascular issues. “Collectively these results suggest that clinicians, advocacy organizations and health policymakers should not recommend increasing calcium intake for fracture prevention either with calcium supplements or through dietary sources,” the authors write. In [one study](http://press.psprings.co.uk/bmj/september/calciumres2.pdf), the researchers conducted a review of randomized controlled trials looking at how extra calcium intake in women and men over age 50 affected bone mineral density. The researchers found increases in bone mineral density of about 1-2% over up to five years, but the authors say these increases are “unlikely to translate into clinically meaningful reductions in fractures.” Post-menopausal women lose an average of about 1% in bone mineral density a year. “Increasing calcium intake from dietary sources or by taking calcium supplements produces small non-progressive increases in BMD, which are unlikely to lead to a clinically significant reduction in risk of fracture,” the study authors conclude. In their [other study](http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.h4580), the researchers looked at studies on the link between calcium intake and lower risk of fractures. The studies varied in quality, but the researchers found a lack of evidence to support the relationship. “Dietary calcium intake is not associated with risk of fracture, and there is no clinical trial evidence that increasing calcium intake from dietary sources prevents fractures,” the study authors write. “Evidence that calcium supplements prevent fractures is weak and inconsistent.” The researchers only found one study that supported increased calcium intake for lower fracture risk, but noted that the study, published in 1992, was in a frail population with notable vitamin D deficiency (vitamin D is also often recommended to prevent fracture in older adults). The researchers say this one study is often referenced in other research on the topic, and that studies should not rely on it given its unique population. The new results also fall in line with the [guidance](http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/UpdateSummaryFinal/vitamin-d-and-calcium-to-prevent-fractures-preventive-medication) provided by the United States Preventative Services Task Force in 2013\. The task force reviewed studies on the use of vitamin D and calcium to prevent fractures, and ultimately concluded that, based on the evidence available, post-menopausal women should not take daily supplements. In a [corresponding editorial](http://www.bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.h4825), Karl Michaëlsson, a professor at Uppsala University in Sweden, writes that given the lack of evidence to support increasing calcium and vitamin D intake for better bone health, the continued emphasis is “puzzling.” “The profitability of the global supplements industry probably plays its part,” he argues. “Manufacturers have deep pockets, and there is a tendency for research efforts to follow the money (with accompanying academic prestige), rather than a path defined only by the needs of patients and the public.” Given growing skepticism, it’s worth talking with your physician if you’re currently loading up on calcium for stronger bones. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/"},"headline":"Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good, Studies Say","datePublished":"2015-09-29T22:30:23.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:57:39.104Z","description":"Two new studies suggest a lack of evidence to support taking calcium for better bone health or to prevent fractures","url":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/","keywords":["Diet & Nutrition","Dairy","Milk","Supplements","Calcium"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt94eae3d610baf290/698865f3a988ca6eb56b495e/strong.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alexandra Sifferlin","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt94eae3d610baf290/698865f3a988ca6eb56b495e/strong.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"480815157","caption":"480815157","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/dietnutrition/","name":"Diet & Nutrition"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/","name":"Calcium Supplements Aren’t Doing Your Bones Any Good, Studies Say"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Should I Drink Nonfat Half-And-Half?","description":"Whether you're wondering about the health benefits (or harms) of fat-free half-and-half, or simply wondering what it is, here's why all five of our health experts this week warned against it.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/OXuvbc41/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-04-16T12:36:20.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/OXuvbc41.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/","duration":"PT1M28S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/4053338/calcium-supplements-bone-health/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```