<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/" -->

---
title: Target&#x27;s Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start
description: We need to tell ourselves that ‘girl&#x27; and ‘boy&#x27; interests do not exist
canonical: https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/
author: Darlena Cunha
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2015-08-10T16:12:38.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:05:00.689Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Target&#x27;s Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start
og:description: We need to tell ourselves that ‘girl&#x27; and ‘boy&#x27; interests do not exist
og:url: https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2560
og:image:height: 1440
og:image:alt: Target CVS
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Target&#x27;s Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start
twitter:description: We need to tell ourselves that ‘girl&#x27; and ‘boy&#x27; interests do not exist
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Target's Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="e3bb224e-3ef5-4a4d-a14c-952412873188" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e3bb224e-3ef5-4a4d-a14c-952412873188&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=e3bb224e-3ef5-4a4d-a14c-952412873188&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=e3bb224e-3ef5-4a4d-a14c-952412873188&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/3QleRQaw.m3u8" -->
## Video: Did Mattel Really Pull SeaWorld Barbie for Animal Rights?

[Watch (HLS stream): Did Mattel Really Pull SeaWorld Barbie for Animal Rights?](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/3QleRQaw.m3u8) (0:56)

![Did Mattel Really Pull SeaWorld Barbie for Animal Rights?](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/3QleRQaw/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2015-04-29. Mattel has decided to pull its SeaWorld Barbie, a move hailed by activists but is also part of a broader brand revitalization for the iconic toy._


by 

[Darlena Cunha](https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/)


## Darlena Cunha


Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM UTC

![Target CVS](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Target Corp. signage stands outside a shopping center in Moline, Ill. on April 2, 2015.

Target Corp. signage stands outside a shopping center in Moline, Ill. on April 2, 2015. Daniel Acker—Bloomberg/Getty Images

by 

[Darlena Cunha](https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/)


## Darlena Cunha


Aug 10, 2015 4:12 PM UTC

Target [announced](https://corporate.target.com/article/2015/08/gender-based-signs-corporate) on Friday that it will [remove gendered labeling](http://time.com/3989850/target-gender-signs/) from many of its aisles. Some are [calling](https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/29225003/targets-bold-move-to-break-down-gender-stereotypes/) this a [bold move](http://www.upworthy.com/target-hits-the-bulls-eye-by-announcing-an-end-to-gender-based-signs-in-sections-of-its-stores). I’m wondering why.

Since my daughters were little tots, they’ve gravitated toward building blocks, science kits, and bows-and-arrows. We hardly ever saw them with a doll in hand. In fact, now 7, they received Barbies at their recent birthday party. By the time we made it home, one of the toys was missing her leg. “She seemed so bendy,” my daughter exclaimed. “I thought her legs were supposed to do that.” Far from demure, gentle spirits, the twins often wrestle in the yard, after digging for worms, of course.

But they also love princesses. They’ll dress up in my fanciest clothes and don lip gloss, and blush and braid each other’s hair. They’ll act out scenes from Princess Sofia and spend hours meticulously placing beads on a string in a pattern so they can wear their own necklaces.

Basically, they’re kids.

Our family has never distinguished between “girl” and “boy” pastimes, so to me, this move by Target is a simple reflection of the better direction in which our culture is moving. But what took them so long?

For children, learning what society expects of them is an important part of their journey. They are aware of each cultural cue, adding it to their blossoming knowledge of the world around them. Kids are also by nature incredibly self-centered. Their minds relate everything they see and hear back to themselves. They use these hints to distinguish who they are as a person, and whether that definition is in line with what the world says it should be.


It can be utterly deflating for a child to express interest in a toy only to be told that the toy is “for girls” or “for boys.” Not only could they feel the pain of not being able to play with something they like, they could also feel embarrassed and chastised for who they are.

Even in an open household like ours, gender labeling doesn’t go undetected. Last year for Christmas, one twin was upset she couldn’t find a purple Nerf gun for her sister. She had to go with blue. Advertising and society told her that girl stuff is pink and purple, even if she missed the larger message often conveyed—that Nerf guns are for boys.

Children are listening. But it appears adults are not. Some of the comments in response to Target’s decision are [shocking](http://pigtailpalsblog.com/2015/08/target-moves-away-from-gendered-signs-and-shelving/#.VcgTGPlVikp).

Parents: Just because your son wants a My Little Pony bedspread does not mean he’s gay. Just because your daughter wants a bug collecting kit doesn’t mean she’s transgender. And if your children don’t identify with the gender binary, that’s OK. Gender identity has nothing to do with signage in a store. Maybe you should consider backing off and loving the wonderful being you created whether they are homosexual, or queer, or transgender, or straight. Whether they like pink or blue or yellow or polka dots.


It’s not like we’re not going to be able to find dollhouses or G.I. Joes anymore. They’re just not going to be separated by a “girl” and “boy” aisle. The products will still be there, and parents can still buy whichever they like for their children. Do we, as adults, need these boxes we’ve placed around identity so badly that the removal of a sign will throw our entire definition of life into a tailspin? If that’s the case, maybe we should look closely at ourselves, instead of at a missing label.

To me, Target’s move is just the tip of the iceberg. We need to pressure manufacturers to get rid of the labeling on the products. We need to pressure advertisers to lose the labeling in their commercials. We need to tell ourselves that “girl” and “boy” interests do not exist. Every child is an individual, and we have a duty to find out who each and every one of them is instead of lumping children into categories before they can speak for themselves.



## Transcript

The controversy surrounding SeaWorld has bleed over into toy world. Specifically, the world of Barbie. Mattel announced last week it's pulling the SeaWorld Barbie doll. A move that comes as fall out from the 2013 CNN documentary, Black Fish, continues. Animal rights activists who allege SeaWorld's use of Orca whales for entertainment constitutes animal cruelty have hailed the decision Decision. But for Mattel, it might be less about animal rights and more part of a brand revival for Barbie. In recent years, Barbie's been edge out by competitors, including Lego, which last year narrowly beat Mattel to become the biggest toy company in the world.

So Mattel has looked to revitalized, pushing new initiatives like Barbie's Sheros. A series of one of a kind dolls it created to honor female role models, like 'Selma' director Ava DuVernay and actor Kristin Chenoweth. That follows a trend of more empowering Barbie characters, including a super hero Barbie featured in the doll's latest movie, 'Princess Power'. Mattel's stocks were up earlier this month after posting better than expected first quarter earnings.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/"},"headline":"Target's Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start","datePublished":"2015-08-10T16:12:38.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:05:00.689Z","description":"We need to tell ourselves that ‘girl' and ‘boy' interests do not exist","url":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/","keywords":["Business topic"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Darlena Cunha","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/darlena-cunha/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9f604272d1ce06f1/698854855f570fd96eb1bfba/target-cvs.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Target CVS","caption":"Target CVS","creditText":"Daniel Acker—Bloomberg/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/","name":"Target's Decision to Remove Gender-Based Signs Is Just the Start"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"Did Mattel Really Pull SeaWorld Barbie for Animal Rights?","description":"Mattel has decided to pull its SeaWorld Barbie, a move hailed by activists but is also part of a broader brand revitalization for the iconic toy.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/3QleRQaw/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-04-29T17:55:09.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/3QleRQaw.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/","duration":"PT56S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/3990442/target-gender-based-signs/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

