<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/" -->

---
title: Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
canonical: https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/
author: Dr. Amy Tuteur
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2015-08-04T18:36:19.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:58:17.500Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
og:description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
og:url: https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2560
og:image:height: 1440
og:image:alt: Baby's bottles
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
twitter:description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="76268f85-6aba-493f-b3bc-07c2c832d3bb" campaign="time-nl-network-2026q3" creative="time-nl-network-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: September 2026.

## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=76268f85-6aba-493f-b3bc-07c2c832d3bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### The seven newsletters

| Newsletter | Covers | Frequency |
| --- | --- | --- |
| The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily |
| Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) |
| Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays |
| Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly |
| D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week |
| Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) |
| In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) |

Source: TIME, August 2026.

### Key data points

| Metric | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 |
| Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 |
| Publishing since | 1923 | TIME |

### TIME Newsletters: key statements

*   Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read.
*   All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=76268f85-6aba-493f-b3bc-07c2c832d3bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).
*   The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=76268f85-6aba-493f-b3bc-07c2c832d3bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What newsletters does TIME publish?

TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.

#### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?

It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.

#### Are TIME's newsletters free?

Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.

#### Who writes TIME's newsletters?

TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.

#### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?

Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.

### Sources

*   TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=76268f85-6aba-493f-b3bc-07c2c832d3bb&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What newsletters does TIME publish?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Are TIME's newsletters free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who writes TIME's newsletters?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8" -->
## Video: The History of Birth Control

[Watch (HLS stream): The History of Birth Control](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8) (3:12)

![The History of Birth Control](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/4oCau3Jn/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2015-01-22. For as long as men and women have been having children, they’ve been trying to figure out how not to. Artifacts dating back to ancient times have shown that contraceptives have been used for thousands of years._


by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Aug 4, 2015 6:36 PM UTC

![Baby's bottles](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Baby's bottle

Baby's bottle Getty Images (1); Illustration by Mia Tramz for TIME

by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Aug 4, 2015 6:36 PM UTC

It’s World Breastfeeding Week, but I’m not celebrating.

It’s not because I don’t understand the benefits of breastfeeding; I’m an obstetrician.

And it’s not sour grapes; I breastfed four children and I enjoyed it.

I’m not celebrating because my email inbox is filled with tales of anguish from women who feel guilty because they tried to breastfeed and were not successful. These women are tormented even when their babies are thriving on formula. Why? Because it has been drilled into them that “breast is best,” and, therefore, they are harming their beloved babies by formula feeding.

In industrialized countries in 2015 the “bressure” to breastfeed is extraordinary, despite the fact that the benefits are trivial, a few less colds and diarrheal illnesses across the population in the first year of life. Research on other potential benefits of breastfeeding is weak, conflicted and plagued by confounding variables.

Why are we celebrating World Breastfeeding Week in the U.S? It’s not to educate women since everyone knows that breastfeeding has benefits. It can’t be to improve public health since [wide swings in breastfeeding rates in the 20th Century](http://www.skepticalob.com/2015/02/3-graphs-every-formula-feeding-mother-needs-to-see.html) (from initiation rates over 70% down to 20% and back up above 75%) have had no impact on infant mortality rates, life expectancy or IQ.

It appears that we are celebrating World Breastfeeding Week in the US to extol mothers who breastfeed and to shame those who don’t.

How did we get to this point?

The vision of the World Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy (WABA), the sponsor of World Breastfeeding Week is “[a world where breastfeeding is the cultural norm](http://waba.org.my/aboutus.htm).”


In other words, WABA hopes for a world where breastfeeding is not the personal choice of the woman who owns the breasts in question but a moral imperative.

That is a disturbingly familiar formulation. It echoes “a world where marriage of a man and woman is the cultural norm” and “promoting a culture of life,” statements that reflect the desire of a portion of the population to substitute their personal beliefs for the beliefs of the individuals who are affected.

Wait! Isn’t breastfeeding natural?

Sure, but while it is natural for women to bear children; the idea that all women _should_ have children is a cultural norm, a norm that is harmful for women who don’t want children.

Similarly, it is natural for women to breastfeed; but the idea that all women _should_ breastfeed whether they want to or not and whether their babies are thriving or not is a cultural norm, a norm that is harmful for many women and babies.


Wait! Isn’t breast milk the perfect food?

Not exactly.

There are three characteristics that a perfect infant food must have:

1. It should contain all the nutrients and other factors that an infant needs.

1. It must be available in sufficient quantity to promote vigorous growth of the infant.

1. The infant must be able to access it easily.

Any food that does not meet all three criteria cannot, under any circumstances, be a perfect food for that child. Breast milk may be the perfect food for some infants, but it is highly imperfect for many others.

Up to 5% of mothers cannot produce enough breast milk to fully meet a baby’s needs. No biological process is guaranteed to work perfectly. If established pregnancies have a 20% miscarriage rate, it is hardly surprising that breastfeeding has a failure rate of only a fraction of that amount. When mothers do not produce enough milk to meet a baby’s needs, the baby may stop growing or even lose weight.


Many babies are not capable of efficiently extracting milk from the breast. Some babies just can’t do it for anatomical reasons, or because of weak muscle tone, or because they simply never get the hang of it. It is a serious problem that can, in severe cases, lead to dehydration and death.

The truth is that breastfeeding is only one of _two_ excellent ways to nourish a baby. Formula is as safe as houses and just as much of a lifesaver. Indeed, many women who choose to formula feed _are_ doing the best for their babies.

I’d happily celebrate World Infant Feeding Week. For some babies that would mean breastfeeding, for others formula feeding. But I can’t celebrate anything that lauds some mothers while shaming others.

We should not be celebrating the moralization of infant feeding. It’s not good for mothers and it’s certainly not good for babies.


## Transcript

[ MUSIC ] For as long as men and women have been having children, they've been trying to figure out how not to. Artifacts dating back to ancient times have shown that contraceptives have been used for thousands of years. Unsurprisingly, not every method was all that effective. In ancient China, concubines would drink a cocktail of lead and mercury. Unfortunately, the side effects included sterility, brain damage. Kidney failure and death. Ancient Egyptian women would mix honey, sodium carbonate, and crocodile dung into a thick paste they would insert into themselves before having sex. In Greece in the year 200 a gynecologist named Soranus.

Advised women to hold their breathe during intercourse and sneeze afterward. [ SNEEZE ] And in the Middle Ages in Europe, women believed tying weasel testicles to their thighs or around their necks during sex would prevent pregnancy. Huh? But it wasn't all a shot in the dark. Many modern forms of contraception have roots in the ancient past. For example, ancient cave drawings found in France appear to show an early version of the condom and a prototype of the cervical cap has been used since Casanova's days. In his memoirs written in the 18th century he describes using partially squeezed lemon halves to do the trick.

[ MUSIC ] The modern history of not having babies begins in the mid 1800's. When vulcanized rubber was patented and condoms could be mass produced. [ MUSIC ] Yet for much of the 19th and early 20th centuries women had a hard time getting their hands on effective contraception. Contraception. Anti- obscenity laws in the US restricted anyone, including doctors, from spreading information about it. But that didn't stop women from trying to prevent pregnancy. Many women would use household products, such as Lysol or Coca- Cola, which they believed would kill sperm. [ MUSIC ] Advertisements for Lysol even endorsed the product as a way for women to protect their married happiness.

All of that changed in 1960 when the FDA approved an oral contraceptive pill thanks to the tireless efforts of activist Margaret Sanger. And a team of doctors. Within five years millions of American women had prescriptions for the pill. In the following decades other forms of reliable contraception appeared, including IUD's. Safe and effective birth control still isn't a universal privilege. A 2013 report found that 222 million women from developing countries around the world. Said they wanted to use birth control but didn't have access to it. But in the US, a whopping 99 % of women of child bearing age say that they've used some form of contraception.

No crocodile dung required. [ MUSIC ]

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/"},"headline":"Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week","datePublished":"2015-08-04T18:36:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:58:17.500Z","description":"The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies","url":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","keywords":["breastfeeding","Parenting"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Dr. Amy Tuteur","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Baby's bottles","caption":"Baby's bottles","creditText":"Getty Images (1); Illustration by Mia Tramz for TIME","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/breastfeeding/","name":"breastfeeding"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","name":"Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"The History of Birth Control","description":"For as long as men and women have been having children, they’ve been trying to figure out how not to. Artifacts dating back to ancient times have shown that contraceptives have been used for thousands of years.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/4oCau3Jn/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-01-22T23:59:46.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","duration":"PT3M12S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

