<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/" -->

---
title: Why I&#x27;m Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
canonical: https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/
author: Dr. Amy Tuteur
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2015-08-04T18:36:19.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:58:17.500Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: Why I&#x27;m Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
og:description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
og:url: https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2560
og:image:height: 1440
og:image:alt: Baby&#x27;s bottles
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: Why I&#x27;m Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week
twitter:description: The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week

<!-- mobian-agent-ad id="6548c346-33c5-4c10-b26c-f337e3a97e43" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6548c346-33c5-4c10-b26c-f337e3a97e43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 |
| Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=6548c346-33c5-4c10-b26c-f337e3a97e43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=6548c346-33c5-4c10-b26c-f337e3a97e43&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->


<!-- video src="https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8" -->
## Video: The History of Birth Control

[Watch (HLS stream): The History of Birth Control](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8) (3:12)

![The History of Birth Control](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/4oCau3Jn/poster.jpg?width=720)

_Published 2015-01-22. For as long as men and women have been having children, they’ve been trying to figure out how not to. Artifacts dating back to ancient times have shown that contraceptives have been used for thousands of years._


by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Aug 4, 2015 6:36 PM UTC

![Baby's bottles](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

Baby's bottle

Baby's bottleGetty Images (1); Illustration by Mia Tramz for TIME

by 

[Dr. Amy Tuteur](https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/)


## Dr. Amy Tuteur


Aug 4, 2015 6:36 PM UTC

It’s World Breastfeeding Week, but I’m not celebrating.

It’s not because I don’t understand the benefits of breastfeeding; I’m an obstetrician.

And it’s not sour grapes; I breastfed four children and I enjoyed it.

I’m not celebrating because my email inbox is filled with tales of anguish from women who feel guilty because they tried to breastfeed and were not successful. These women are tormented even when their babies are thriving on formula. Why? Because it has been drilled into them that “breast is best,” and, therefore, they are harming their beloved babies by formula feeding.

In industrialized countries in 2015 the “bressure” to breastfeed is extraordinary, despite the fact that the benefits are trivial, a few less colds and diarrheal illnesses across the population in the first year of life. Research on other potential benefits of breastfeeding is weak, conflicted and plagued by confounding variables.

Why are we celebrating World Breastfeeding Week in the U.S? It’s not to educate women since everyone knows that breastfeeding has benefits. It can’t be to improve public health since [wide swings in breastfeeding rates in the 20th Century](http://www.skepticalob.com/2015/02/3-graphs-every-formula-feeding-mother-needs-to-see.html) (from initiation rates over 70% down to 20% and back up above 75%) have had no impact on infant mortality rates, life expectancy or IQ.

It appears that we are celebrating World Breastfeeding Week in the US to extol mothers who breastfeed and to shame those who don’t.

How did we get to this point?

The vision of the World Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy (WABA), the sponsor of World Breastfeeding Week is “[a world where breastfeeding is the cultural norm](http://waba.org.my/aboutus.htm).”


In other words, WABA hopes for a world where breastfeeding is not the personal choice of the woman who owns the breasts in question but a moral imperative.

That is a disturbingly familiar formulation. It echoes “a world where marriage of a man and woman is the cultural norm” and “promoting a culture of life,” statements that reflect the desire of a portion of the population to substitute their personal beliefs for the beliefs of the individuals who are affected.

Wait! Isn’t breastfeeding natural?

Sure, but while it is natural for women to bear children; the idea that all women _should_ have children is a cultural norm, a norm that is harmful for women who don’t want children.

Similarly, it is natural for women to breastfeed; but the idea that all women _should_ breastfeed whether they want to or not and whether their babies are thriving or not is a cultural norm, a norm that is harmful for many women and babies.


Wait! Isn’t breast milk the perfect food?

Not exactly.

There are three characteristics that a perfect infant food must have:

1. It should contain all the nutrients and other factors that an infant needs.

1. It must be available in sufficient quantity to promote vigorous growth of the infant.

1. The infant must be able to access it easily.

Any food that does not meet all three criteria cannot, under any circumstances, be a perfect food for that child. Breast milk may be the perfect food for some infants, but it is highly imperfect for many others.

Up to 5% of mothers cannot produce enough breast milk to fully meet a baby’s needs. No biological process is guaranteed to work perfectly. If established pregnancies have a 20% miscarriage rate, it is hardly surprising that breastfeeding has a failure rate of only a fraction of that amount. When mothers do not produce enough milk to meet a baby’s needs, the baby may stop growing or even lose weight.


Many babies are not capable of efficiently extracting milk from the breast. Some babies just can’t do it for anatomical reasons, or because of weak muscle tone, or because they simply never get the hang of it. It is a serious problem that can, in severe cases, lead to dehydration and death.

The truth is that breastfeeding is only one of _two_ excellent ways to nourish a baby. Formula is as safe as houses and just as much of a lifesaver. Indeed, many women who choose to formula feed _are_ doing the best for their babies.

I’d happily celebrate World Infant Feeding Week. For some babies that would mean breastfeeding, for others formula feeding. But I can’t celebrate anything that lauds some mothers while shaming others.

We should not be celebrating the moralization of infant feeding. It’s not good for mothers and it’s certainly not good for babies.

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/"},"headline":"Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week","datePublished":"2015-08-04T18:36:19.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:58:17.500Z","description":"The moralization of infant feeding is not good for mothers or babies","url":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","keywords":["breastfeeding","Parenting"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Dr. Amy Tuteur","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/dr-amy-tuteur/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blte8757c12a14ee406/69885dd60a4a22ece59c5759/baby-bottles.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Baby's bottles","caption":"Baby's bottles","creditText":"Getty Images (1); Illustration by Mia Tramz for TIME","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/breastfeeding/","name":"breastfeeding"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","name":"Why I'm Not Celebrating World Breastfeeding Week"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"The History of Birth Control","description":"For as long as men and women have been having children, they’ve been trying to figure out how not to. Artifacts dating back to ancient times have shown that contraceptives have been used for thousands of years.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/4oCau3Jn/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2015-01-22T23:59:46.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/4oCau3Jn.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/","duration":"PT3M12S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/3983936/world-breastfeeding-week-2/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}]
```

