--- title: Third-Party Advocates File Lawsuit Over Presidential Debates description: A lawsuit argues that the Commission on Presidential Debates has improperly limited third-party candidates. canonical: https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/ author: Zeke Miller article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-06-22T02:28:51.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-19T07:47:16.315Z article:section: Politics og:title: Third-Party Advocates Sue Over Presidential Debates og:description: The lawsuit argues the debates improperly benefit Democrats and Republicans. og:url: https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2a5c92b770e7bf41/6988557ff887dc9fb4e91058/barack-obama-mitt-romney-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 594 og:image:height: 334 og:image:alt: US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the end of the third and final presidential debate October 22, 2012 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida. og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Third-Party Advocates Sue Over Presidential Debates twitter:description: The lawsuit argues the debates improperly benefit Democrats and Republicans. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2a5c92b770e7bf41/6988557ff887dc9fb4e91058/barack-obama-mitt-romney-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=594&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Third-Party Advocates File Lawsuit Over Presidential Debates > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef008487-d3b5-4b4b-8e43-29e7529981e2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef008487-d3b5-4b4b-8e43-29e7529981e2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=ef008487-d3b5-4b4b-8e43-29e7529981e2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ef008487-d3b5-4b4b-8e43-29e7529981e2&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Zeke Miller](https://time.com/author/zeke-j-miller/) ## Zeke Miller Jun 22, 2015 2:28 AM UTC  US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the end of the third and final presidential debate October 22, 2012 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida. US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the end of the third and final presidential debate October 22, 2012 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida. MANDEL NGAN—AFP/Getty Images by [Zeke Miller](https://time.com/author/zeke-j-miller/) ## Zeke Miller Jun 22, 2015 2:28 AM UTC A coalition of advocates for third parties in presidential elections is filing a lawsuit Monday against barriers to entry in presidential debates. Alleging that the Federal Election Commission and the Commission on Presidential Debates have fostered a duopoly in American politics that has made it impossible for a third-party candidate to win the White House, the suit seeks to upend a decades-old debate system, while striking a blow against the 150-year Democrat-Republican regime. Organized by the group Level the Playing Field, which sprung out of the failed 2012 third party effort “Americans Elect” and backed by multi-millionaire financier Peter Ackerman, the lawsuit includes both the Green Party and Libertarian National Committee. It comes as the American public is more dissatisfied with the traditional party system than ever before, and the prospects for fixing it are especially dim. “It’s the little rules that nobody can see that make all the difference,” plaintiff Peter Ackerman told TIME in an interview, suggesting that the debate rule could be the unseen panacea.Watched by tens of millions of people, the debates are the largest media event of the political calendar, and offer candidates unrivaled opportunity to reach voters. Ackerman asserts that Americans Elect was unable to secure a candidate in 2012 because there was no credible pathway to participating in the debates, making victory on Election Day essentially impossible. Critics of the effort scoff that the rules changes are a solution in search of a problem, with no third party candidate on the horizon, or worse: that it is an effort to pave the way for wealthy self-funding candidates to buy their way onto the debate stage. CPD was founded by the Democratic and Republican parties in 1987 and has run every presidential debate since. Only Ross Perot has made the debate stage without being the nominee of either major party, and only during his first run in 1992\. Rules in 2012 required that a debate-stage-aspirant be Constitutionally eligible to hold the presidency, have achieved ballot access sufficient to potentially win the needed 270 electoral votes, and—controversially—require that they poll at 15 percent in national surveys. Level the Playing Field contends that the 15-percent threshold is too high, and that reducing it alone would not make it any easier for a third party to participate. It proposes a playoff six months before election to allow a third-party contender with the highest poll numbers or most public signatures collected to participate in the debates. Critics argue that the run-off would become a de-facto election, artificially boosting a also-ran on one or the other side of the aisle and weakening one credible candidate over the other. Ackerman and the groups have filed complaints and rule-making requests with the FEC alleging that CPD, has conspired to keep out third-party candidates to preserve the influence of the two major parties. The lawsuit stems from the similarly-divided FEC’s refusal to take action on their requests. The lawsuit contends that by effectively limiting the field to Democrats and Republicans, both the CPD and FEC are not non-partisan, rather, bipartisan, potentially putting the debate group in violation of FEC rules. The FEC has set standards for debate sponsors, requiring them to be news organizations or non-profits that do not “endorse, support, or oppose political candidates or political parties.” “The FEC has had Plaintiffs’ administrative complaint for over nine months (284 days), and yet has taken no action on it even though \[Federal Election Campaign Act\] requires the agency to act within 120 days,” the lawsuit states. “The FEC has also effectively pocket-vetoed a separate, but related, petition for rulemaking requesting that it amend its debate regulation to prohibit the use of polling as the sole means of access to presidential debates. The FEC is apparently ignoring the petition for rulemaking even though it too was filed more than nine months ago; even though 1,251 independent individuals and organizations – all but four of whom were unknown to Plaintiffs – filed comments supporting a rulemaking; and even though the only commenter opposing the proposed rulemaking was the CPD itself.” ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/"},"headline":"Third-Party Advocates File Lawsuit Over Presidential Debates","datePublished":"2015-06-22T02:28:51.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-19T07:47:16.315Z","description":"A lawsuit argues that the Commission on Presidential Debates has improperly limited third-party candidates.","url":"https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/","keywords":["Debates","2016 Election"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2a5c92b770e7bf41/6988557ff887dc9fb4e91058/barack-obama-mitt-romney-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Zeke Miller","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/zeke-j-miller/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt2a5c92b770e7bf41/6988557ff887dc9fb4e91058/barack-obama-mitt-romney-debate.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the end of the third and final presidential debate October 22, 2012 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida.","caption":"US President Barack Obama shakes hands with Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney at the end of the third and final presidential debate October 22, 2012 at Lynn University in Boca Raton, Florida.","creditText":"MANDEL NGAN—AFP/Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/debates/","name":"Debates"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3929644/presidential-debates-lawsuit/","name":"Third-Party Advocates File Lawsuit Over Presidential Debates"}}]}] ```