--- title: The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings description: With a new novel loosely based on a certain royal romance out today, Heather Cocks and Jessica Morgan re-examine some regal weddings. canonical: https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/ author: TIME article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-04-07T15:56:29.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-05-11T04:39:00.826Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings og:description: Jessica Morgan and Heather Cocks take a look at 12 regal dresses og:url: https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings twitter:description: Jessica Morgan and Heather Cocks take a look at 12 regal dresses twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=0be98aa6-3b89-488f-ae52-0b8292ca5fc6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=0be98aa6-3b89-488f-ae52-0b8292ca5fc6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=0be98aa6-3b89-488f-ae52-0b8292ca5fc6&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Heather Cocks](https://time.com/author/heather-cocks/) and [Jessica Morgan](https://time.com/author/jessica-morgan/) Apr 7, 2015 3:56 PM UTC by [Heather Cocks](https://time.com/author/heather-cocks/) and [Jessica Morgan](https://time.com/author/jessica-morgan/) Apr 7, 2015 3:56 PM UTC **Correction appended, April 7, 2015.** It’s been four years since Kate Middleton donned the McQueen wedding gown that launched a thousand paper dolls and princess fantasies. So far, so good: royal baby No. 2 is due this month. But living a fairy tale isn’t always so easy — something we explore in our new novel [_The Royal We_](http://www.amazon.com/dp/1455557102/?tag=timecom-20), which opens on the eve of a royal wedding that may not happen and is loosely based on the courtship of Prince William and Kate Middleton. In honor of happy endings, both hoped-for and actual, join us as we explore a century of British royal wedding gowns and the real-life characters who wore them. _Heather Cocks and Jessica Morgan are the authors of_ [_The Royal We_](http://www.amazon.com/dp/1455557102/?tag=timecom-20)_, out this week. Their blog,_ [_GoFugYourself_](http://www.gofugyourself.com/)_, is a witty, no-holds-barred look at celebrity fashion and pop culture._ **Correction: The original version of this included a photo caption that misidentified King George V and Queen Mary.** ### Edward VII and Queen Alexandra, 1863  An illustration of the Prince of Wales' marriage to Alexandra of Denmark at St. George 's Chapel, Windsor on March 10, 1863. Lebrecht/Corbis Like many royal brides after her, Queen Alexandra proved to be a trendsetter. Victorian women copied not only her habitual high-necked dresses and giant chokers (which she wore to cover a scar), they even aped _her limp_. We can only assume that, after this wedding, everyone who was anyone considered wearing a crown of orange blossoms to the market. ### George V and Queen Mary, 1893  King George V on his wedding day with his bride Princess Mary of Teck on July 6, 1893. Hulton Archive/Getty Images You wouldn’t know it from their solemn expressions, but these two were a love match. Mary of Teck was chosen as the bride for Edward VII’s heir Albert Victor, but when Albert died of influenza, she fell for his brother during the throes of grief. (Where’s the swoony PBS miniseries about _that_)? The dress has a more alluring cut than its predecessors, but the orange blossom strands — a purity motif — feel a bit like a late add. Or a hasty assurance that the fiance-swap was all above-board. ### George VI and Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, 1923  Lady Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon and Prince Albert, Duke of York (later to be King George VI) on the balcony of Buckingham Palace after their wedding ceremony at Westminster Abbey, London on April 26, 1923. AP The former Prince Albert’s choice of a non-royal wife was considered extremely modern, even for a man who was at that time The Spare, and Elizabeth’s dress reflects that: Its 1920s look dovetails with reports that it was chosen from a shop window mere weeks before the wedding. Papers at the time called it “medieval” and they had a point; it’s not the most flattering or dreamy garment. But Elizabeth’s lack of interest in frills (she refused a tiara) may be part of what the world loved about her: Here, and during the war and beyond, she just put her head down and got it done. ### Wallis Simpson and the Duke of Windsor (formerly Edward VIII), 1937  The Duke of Windsor, formerly Edward VIII King of Great Britain and the Duchess of Windsor, Wallis Simpson, on their wedding day at the Chateau de Conde, near Tours, France. Topical Press Agency/Getty Images The tremendous romance of a man abdicating the throne for his true love (who happened to have been married to someone else) has, in recent years, been sullied by [reports](http://www.standard.co.uk/news/how-wallis-simpson-would-have-been-a-nazi-queen-of-england-6439450.html) that the Duke and Duchess of Windsor were rumored Nazi sympathizers. And so we feel comfortable noting that, though Wallis’s gown is deeply appropriate for her third wedding, her headdress looks like she stuck a dinner plate in her bun. ### Queen Elizabeth II and Prince Philip, 1947  Princess Elizabeth and Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh wave to the crowds from the balcony of Buckingham Palace in London on their wedding day. Nov. 20,1947. AP Perhaps it’s because she has reigned so long, and long may she yet, but QEII never struck us as one for girly frills and furbelows. So the stunning 13-foot Botticelli-inspired veil feels surprising now, but back then, it was simply meant to symbolize rebirth after the war. She paid for it with clothing-ration coupons, which is awesome, and makes us wish McQueen would accept whatever we could clip out of the Penny Saver. ### Princess Margaret and Anthony Armstrong-Jones (Lord Snowdon), 1960  Princess Margaret and Anthony Armstrong-Jones at Buckingham Palace at their marriage ceremony at Westminster Abbey, London on May 6, 1960. AP Princess Margaret’s was the first televised royal wedding, and her ensemble was worthy of the honor. From the top of her glorious tiara to the hem of her stunningly simple and perfectly tailored gown (courtesy of Norman Hartnell, who also designed QE2’s gown, this time free of post-WWII fabric rationing constrictions), she looked timeless and unforgettable. Now _that_ is a princess. ### Princess Anne and Mark Phillips, 1973  Princess Anne and Captain Mark Phillips leaving the west door of Westminster Abbey in London, after their wedding ceremony, Nov. 14, 1973. AP Anne seems like the royal family member who you’d run to for a good Get-A-Grip talk. She comes across as no-nonsense and practical, as if her name is spelled A-n-n-e but pronounced “sen-si-ble” — and so we were surprised to discover that this otherwise spartan gown has massive wizard sleeves. Then again, Anne is also the royal family member we’d be least surprised to see whip out a wand and shout, “_Expelliarmus_,” or transfigure into a panther. So maybe the math here is sound after all. ### Lady Diana Spencer and Prince Charles, 1981  Charles, Prince of Wales, and Lady Diana Spencer on their wedding day at St Paul's Cathedral, London on July 29, 1981. AP Anyone who was alive when this wedding happened — or even within a few years of it — doesn’t need to see a photo of Diana’s gown. It totally just burst into your head, like popcorn from a kernel, which is kind of what its puffed sleeves evoke. The dress and its 25-foot train were nearly too large to fit into the carriage she would take to St. Paul’s Cathedral. In the moment, it was Cinderella; in hindsight, it was stratospherically over-the-top, but either way it is indisputably iconic. ### Sarah Ferguson and Prince Andrew, 1986  Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York and Prince Andrew, Duke of York stand on the balcony of Buckingham Palace and wave at their wedding on July 23, 1986 in London. Anwar Hussein—Getty Images Fergie and Diana are forever intertwined in many ways, not least of which is that Sarah’s wedding gown, being the first to follow Di’s, looks like the instructions were, “Do _that_, but divided by four.” Only in royal-wedding terms could a dress with that much beading (everything from anchors and waves, to their initials, to bumblebees from her family crest) be considered a restrained step _back_. ### Sophie Rhys-Jones and Prince Edward, 1999  The Earl and Countess of Wessex on their wedding day on June 19, 1999. PA Wire/Press Association Images Edward and Sophie’s wedding wasn’t a full state occasion — no foreign dignitaries were invited, and everyone was told to leave their hats at home (which seems quite boring, frankly). So it stands to reason that Sophie’s dress feels a bit more humdrum than Fergie’s or Diana’s. Sixteen years later, the Countess of Wessex is an Alexander McQueen-loving fashion plate, and we can’t help but wonder what she’d wear if she were allowed a do-over. ### Zara Phillips and Mike Tindall, 2011  Zara Phillips and Mike Tindall in Edinburgh on July 30, 2011. Express Newspapers/AP This may seem woefully dull — whoops, let’s say _understated_ —and as though it may actually be the underskirt of a much cooler gown. But it was designed by the Queen’s own couturier. We can’t decide if Zara picked it herself, or if it was Granny’s pointed attempt to take control of her granddaughter’s historically wilder style. Still, even with that duvet-like hem, Zara looks elegant and happy, and as if she won’t get grief from her children in fifteen years when they Google “Zara Phillips wedding.” Which is really the important thing. ### Kate Middleton and Prince William, 2011  Britain's Prince William and his wife Kate, Duchess of Cambridge wave from the balcony of Buckingham Palace after the Royal Wedding in London April, 29, 2011. Matt Dunham—AP Okay, Zara and Mike got married six months after Kate and Wills did, but we wanted to end on a high note. And there truly is no higher: When the eyes of the entire planet were on her, Kate delivered the most elegantly dreamy and perfectly streamlined Alexander McQueen. This dress assured designer Sarah Burton’s place in history, and helped propel Kate not only into one of the most-watched wardrobes of the world, but into every generation’s hearts and imaginations. And maybe, just a little bit, into a book. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/"},"headline":"The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings","datePublished":"2015-04-07T15:56:29.000Z","dateModified":"2026-05-11T04:39:00.826Z","description":"With a new novel loosely based on a certain royal romance out today, Heather Cocks and Jessica Morgan re-examine some regal weddings","url":"https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/","keywords":["Books"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Heather Cocks","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/heather-cocks/"},{"@type":"Person","name":"Jessica Morgan","jobTitle":"","url":"https://time.com/author/jessica-morgan/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/books/","name":"Books"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3773306/go-fug-yourself-wedding-dresses/","name":"The Fug Girls on a Century of Royal Weddings"}}]}] ```