Bottles of Heinz ketchup are arranged on the bar at Cambridge Common restaurant in Cambridge, Massachusetts Wednesday, July 19, 2006. H.J. Heinz Co., fighting billionaire investor Nelson Peltz's attempt to restructure the company, forecast first-quarter earnings would exceed analysts' estimates, driven by sales in the U.S. and Canada. Photographer: JB Reed/Bloomberg News
JB Reed—Bloomberg News/Getty Images

Heinz Wins Legal Battle Over Dip & Squeeze Ketchup Packets

Heinz doesn’t owe any money to a Michigan man who claimed the condiment company used his idea for a new ketchup container for its own product, a federal jury found Wednesday.

The man, 44-year-old food entrepreneur Daniel Wawryznski, claimed Heinz launched its Dip & Squeeze single-serve ketchup products in 2010 after he introduced a similar idea at a meeting with the company two years prior, the Associated Press reports. Heinz’ Dip & Squeeze acts as both ketchup packet and reservoir, eliminating the need for users to pour the sauce from a packet into a secondary container or paper napkin.

A Pennsylvania jury, however, said Heinz’s Dip & Squeeze wasn’t based on Wawryznski’s idea, which he called the “Little Dipper.” That decision was based in part on evidence that Heinz’ European division was working on a similar concept back in 2002.

“Heinz firmly believed all along that [the plaintiff’s] claims were groundless, and we are pleased to have prevailed in this case,” Michael Mullen, senior vice president of corporate and government affairs for Heinz, told the AP.

It isn’t clear if Wawryznski will appeal the finding.

In March, Heinz announced plans to merge with Kraft Foods in a deal that would create the world’s fifth-largest food and beverage manufacturer, with a total value of $36 billion.

This article originally appeared on

TIME may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.