--- title: The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts description: I like to think I’m mostly a nice person. But look at my text messages and you’ll probably think I’m insane. And I know I’m... canonical: https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/ author: Kelly Conniff article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-03-26T14:40:37.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-04-13T08:55:03.776Z og:title: The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts og:description: I like to think I’m mostly a nice person. But look at my text messages and you’ll probably think I’m insane. And I know I’m... og:url: https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production og:image:width: 1200 og:image:height: 675 og:image:alt: TIME og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts twitter:description: I like to think I’m mostly a nice person. But look at my text messages and you’ll probably think I’m insane. And I know I’m... twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production --- # The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=52909fba-38b9-4ad3-9e3a-add0b47394e7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=52909fba-38b9-4ad3-9e3a-add0b47394e7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=52909fba-38b9-4ad3-9e3a-add0b47394e7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=52909fba-38b9-4ad3-9e3a-add0b47394e7&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1)  by [Kelly Conniff](https://time.com/author/kelly-conniff/)  ## Kelly Conniff Conniff is deputy editor at TIME. Mar 26, 2014 2:40 PM UTC  by [Kelly Conniff](https://time.com/author/kelly-conniff/)  ## Kelly Conniff Conniff is deputy editor at TIME. Mar 26, 2014 2:40 PM UTC I like to think I’m mostly a nice person. But look at my text messages and you’ll probably think I’m insane. And I know I’m not alone — we’ve all used texting as a way to get out all of our passive aggressive and sometimes just plain aggressive _aggressive_ feelings. So what would happen if someone read your texts after you weren’t around? Simple: You’d probably look like a shallow, venal human nightmare that has unkind exchanges about how your friend is always late to everything. And of course, you couldn’t resist calling them out in a group text. You know, just everyday friend shaming stuff. The same thing is happening on a much bigger and more serious scale as the world analyzes Oscar Pistorius’ text messages to his slain girlfriend Reeva Steenkamp after they were used in testimony during the Olympic athlete’s trial. Authorities [extracted more than 1,000 messages](http://www.foxnews.com/world/2014/03/24/oscar-pistorius-murder-trial-begins-fourth-week-as-prosecution-says-it-is/) between the two from her phone. That sounds like a lot of texts. At least until you consider how many times we all press “send” on any given day. Police captain Francois Moller [characterized 90% of the messages](http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/pistorius-trial-witness-testifies-screams-23032252) as “loving” in his testimony. Nonetheless, some of the exchanges between Pistorious and Steenkamp do sound chilling — partially because they’re taken out of context and because we are interpreting them knowing what happens next. One of the texts from Steenkamp reads, “I’m scared of u sometimes and how u snap at me and how u will react to me.” Gulp. Another reads “I can’t be attacked by outsiders for dating u AND be attacked by you, the one person I deserve protection from.” Double gulp. A longer WhatsApp message tweeted by a journalist attending the trial (and [posted by Jezebel](http://jezebel.com/texts-from-oscar-pistoriuss-deceased-girlfriend-are-cr-1550700601)) shades in the colors of a relationship that was at times fraught. [#ReevaSteenkamp](https://twitter.com/hashtag/ReevaSteenkamp?src=hash&ref%5Fsrc=twsrc%5Etfw)’s message to [#OscarPistorius](https://twitter.com/hashtag/OscarPistorius?src=hash&ref%5Fsrc=twsrc%5Etfw) [pic.twitter.com/IAKZJkNAA1](http://t.co/IAKZJkNAA1) — Barry Bateman (@barrybateman) [March 24, 2014](https://twitter.com/barrybateman/status/448154233838125057?ref%5Fsrc=twsrc%5Etfw) A[ deeper look at some of the messages](http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/24/world/oscar-pistorius-trial-whatsapp-messages/) — including ones Pistorius sent to Steenkamp — shows a constant back and forth with Steenkamp defending her behavior, usually quite elegantly. The things that made Pistorius snap at her seem pretty insignificant, at one point he even uses hunger as a defense for getting upset. And even without considering the possible guilt of Pistorius and the trial, fear seems to emanate from Steenkamp’s pleas for respect and love. As [the Frisky pointed out](http://www.thefrisky.com/2014-03-25/reeva-steenkamps-texts-to-oscar-pistorius-weeks-before-he-killed-her-are-totally-disturbing/), the exchanges show classic relationship behavior patterns that are worrisome on a number of levels. In fact it’s impossible not to read their words and get caught up in speculation about both Pistorious’ guilt and the general tenor of the couple’s relationship. But is it fair to use texts as a true barometer of people’s actual feelings and behavior? Before you answer, consider those terse, overdramatic exchanges you have with your significant others about small things that don’t seem like they matter, but actually represent larger, more meaningful issues. We use texting as the most intimate form of communication, almost an extension of our brains. The way that we decide to derive meaning from what people say affects our lives profoundly. And it’s not just text — Gchat and email all afford us the opportunity to dash off innocent notes that are, nonetheless, ripe for misunderstanding. We read [entire articles](http://www.newrepublic.com/article/115726/period-our-simplest-punctuation-mark-has-become-sign-anger) about why punctuation marks are making us angry, annoyed and even fearful about another person’s feelings toward us. And by and large, that’s the root of the problem. Even though these texts are the repository of our most intimate — and arguably honest — feelings, they’re also full of thoughts that don’t represent us or how we’re feeling at all. Think about all of the times you’ve sent someone a message, only to have them come back to you and ask “are you mad at me?” So what would they see if they opened up my recent text history? They’d see a lot of whining, a little bit of nagging and a whole lot of superfluous crap. There’s also a number of terse exchanges, mostly with people like my parents, who aren’t necessarily the best texters in the world, but have resigned themselves to using this communication tool with me. The majority of texts between my mother and me say things like “are you coming home tonight?” or “have not spoken to you in a long time.” My mom’s not unhappy with me, she just hasn’t figured out emojis yet. Give her time. My group chat with my female [digital BFFs](http://nymag.com/thecut/2014/03/great-digital-bff-renaissance.html), basically makes us all look like needy sociopaths who do a terrible job of juxtaposing our desire for constant affirmation with serious life questions. A quick scroll shows a rambling feed that’s a bewildering mix of braggadocio (“I just made THE BEST Brussels sprouts!”), inside jokes (we have a penchant for messaging a list of every item consumed during particularly gluttonous meals) and intense, naked need for approval (“which pair of glasses do you like? Please tell me now because the sales lady is breathing down my neck omg omg”). Long story short, I wouldn’t want any of it to be entered into evidence, no matter what the case. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/"},"headline":"The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts","datePublished":"2014-03-26T14:40:37.000Z","dateModified":"2026-04-13T08:55:03.776Z","description":"I like to think I’m mostly a nice person. But look at my text messages and you’ll probably think I’m insane. And I know I’m...","url":"https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/","keywords":["Living","texting","oscar pistorius","Reeva Steenkamp","trial"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Kelly Conniff","jobTitle":"Conniff is deputy editor at TIME.","url":"https://time.com/author/kelly-conniff/"}],"articleSection":"","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/tag/time-section-living/","name":"Living"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/37597/the-pistorious-trial-and-why-you-cant-judge-a-person-by-their-texts/","name":"The Pistorious Trial and Why You Can’t Judge a Person By Their Texts"}}]}] ```