The author admitted Hermione should have ended up with Harry, not Ron. What else should should have changed?
First, a disclaimer: I love the Harry Potter books and films. I grew up with them. I will read them to my children.
That said, they’re not perfect. J.K. Rowling herself recently admitted that Hermione and Ron should not have ended up together at the end of the series. “I wrote the Hermione/Ron relationship as a form of wish fulfillment,” she said. “That’s how it was conceived, really. For reasons that have very little to do with literature and far more to do with me clinging to the plot as I first imagined it, Hermione ended up with Ron.”
Fans were obviously upset. But as long as we’re revising the books, here are a few more suggestions. WARNING: If you have not read the Harry Potter books (or seen the movies) do not read on.
1. The amount of time they spent in the forrest in book seven
The seventh book had a lot of problems, but none so great as that stupid forrest. I, like everyone else who preordered the last Harry Potter book, read the whole thing in a day. And yet the time they spent in the forrest doing absolutely nothing except being angsty teenagers felt interminably long. Cut out that third of the book, and you have yourself a tight finale…except for that bizarre Dumbledore scene at the end.
Yes, it was a crime that Harry and Hermione didn’t end up together. But the bigger problem was that Harry ended up with Ginny, who, sadly, had no personality. Seriously, name a personality trait for Ginny Weasley besides “nice.” You can’t. All you remember about her is that she has red hair. Having Ginny and Harry end up together just so Harry could be an official part of the Weasley family fit too well and, quite frankly, made no sense. Bring back Cho Chang!
3. Killing off Hedwig
Sorry to pick on book seven again, but this killing seemed unnecessary, bordering on animal cruelty. I know in the fight against evil, people have to die (not Harry, Hermione or Ron, but less important people). But Hedwig? What did she ever do to anybody. Dobby’s death was tragic. Hedwig’s death was excessive.
4. Fred and George not noticing Peter Pettigrew sleeping in Ron’s bed every night on the Marauder’s map
Their first year, Fred and George Wesley stole the Marauder’s map, which showed everyone’s location in Hogwarts. Ron inherited Scabbers, Percy’s old rat, when he went to school. Scabbers was really Peter Pettigrew in hiding. So, logically, why wouldn’t Fred or George (or Harry, for that matter) have been able to see Pettigrew hanging out in Ron’s room for years? Even if Fred and George didn’t recognize the name Pedigrew as the man Sirius Black supposedly murdered, wouldn’t it still have been odd to have seen a stranger they didn’t know following their brother around all the time on the map?
5. Harry not being able to see the thestrals
You see someone die, you see thestrals. Great. Then why can’t Harry see thestrals in the carriages on the way to Hogwarts in the first two books? He saw his mother die. Seeing Sedrick Diggory die in Goblet of Fire shouldn’t have been any different.
Rowling explained this away by saying the only people who could see thestrals were those who had internalized and accepted the death they directly witnessed. Harry was a baby when his parents died so he wasn’t fully aware of it in the way he was of Sedrick’s death. Then why did it take months for Harry to see thestrals after Sedrick’s death? Is it because he had to process it and accept it? Hasn’t he done the same for his parents’ deaths? What’s the time limit on processing before you see thestrals? Shaky at best, Rowling.
6. Being too subtle about Dumbledore’s sexuality
Maybe it’s because I started reading the books when I was six, but I did not pick up on Dumbledore’s gay vibe until Rowling came out and said that he was gay. I kind of see it now rereading the Grindelwald parts, but still: if you have to explain to your readers what you are trying to say in your children’s book, that’s not a good sign. I emphasize children because kids aren’t really great with subtlety. If you want Dumbledore to be gay and for people to know it, write it that way.
7. Voldemort’s Triwizard Tournament evil plot
Harry came to trust Mad Eye Moody (a.k.a. Barty Crouch in disguise). The pair spent a lot of time together. So why is the easiest way to get Harry into the same place as Voldemort to help him win the Triwizard Tournament? That’s a lot of logistics: they had to get him through a maze, for goodness sake. Those sort of poor plans leave a good deal to chance. I bet if Crouch had said, “Hey, Harry come check out this dark and creepy forrest far away from Hogwarts with me and I’ll teach you some cool magic,” Harry would have gone. (Remember, Hermione was always the smart one, not Harry.)
8. Wizarding school sucks
Sure, they have magical powers, but other than that wizards are not highly functional people. How do I know this? Because their schools suck.
You learn very few practical skills. Defense against the dark arts — that’s useful. You know what else is useful? Reading. Math. Foreign languages. How do wizards write newspaper articles or communicate with their foreign friends visiting for the Quidditch World Cup or maintain a wizard economy? Does Hogwarts even have a sex ed class?
What’s worse, school ends at age 17. That’s it. After that you are an adult in the world who can choose from a handful of professions: you can teach, work for the government, own a shop, play Quidditch, train dragons, work for the paper and…yep, that’s pretty much it.
9. The time turner problem
Over the years, fans have repeatedly poked holes the whole time turner plot line. The most obvious question is: if wizards can travel through time, why couldn’t someone — Harry, Dumbledore, literally anyone — go back in time and stop Voldemort back when he was young Tom Riddle? They saved Buckbeak using the time turner, so why not stop Voldemort using it too?
Or is there a time limit on the time turner? What is it? What are the other rules? Would stopping Tom Riddle —or even stopping Bellatrix from hurting someone a few minutes ago break the rules? Would this be an abuse of the time turner power?
Which begs another question: what the heck was McGonagall doing giving such a powerful tool to a second year anyway?
Fans kept challenging the logic of the time turner, so eventually J.K. Rowling had to destroy them all just to shut critics up.