--- title: The Critics Were Wrong About Barack Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech description: President Obama's National Prayer Breakfast speech was not "offensive." It was a powerful celebration of America's religious tradition. canonical: https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/ author: Eric Yoffie article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2015-02-12T20:56:23.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T04:23:05.535Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech Was Right on Point og:description: President Obama's National Prayer Breakfast speech was not "offensive." It was a powerful celebration of America's religious tradition. og:url: https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt899bf52bfadf2aa6/69877f14cd1bba99f36f5312/obama-prayer-breakfast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Obamas Attend National Prayer Breakfast og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech Was Right on Point twitter:description: President Obama's National Prayer Breakfast speech was not "offensive." It was a powerful celebration of America's religious tradition. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt899bf52bfadf2aa6/69877f14cd1bba99f36f5312/obama-prayer-breakfast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # The Critics Were Wrong About Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b242eb70-91af-4601-8676-481574bb716f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=b242eb70-91af-4601-8676-481574bb716f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=b242eb70-91af-4601-8676-481574bb716f&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. by [Eric Yoffie](https://time.com/author/eric-h-yoffie/) ## Eric Yoffie Feb 12, 2015 8:56 PM UTC  President Barack Obama speaks during the National Prayer Breakfast on Feb. 5, 2015 in Washington D.C. President Barack Obama speaks during the National Prayer Breakfast on Feb. 5, 2015 in Washington D.C. Getty Images by [Eric Yoffie](https://time.com/author/eric-h-yoffie/) ## Eric Yoffie Feb 12, 2015 8:56 PM UTC Fierce certainty is the enemy of religious belief. President Obama understands that. The religious right does not. In a [remarkable address](http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2015/02/05/remarks-president-national-prayer-breakfast) to a national prayer breakfast on February 5, Mr. Obama gave one of the better speeches of his presidency. The heart of his message was that “the starting point of faith is some doubt.” The major religious problem of our time, he suggested, comes from so-called believers who are so full of themselves and so confident they are right that that they cast aside all humility. They think that God speaks only to them. From this they conclude that they alone are in possession of the truth and that God cares only about them. The first thing to be said about the President’s thesis is that it is self-evidently correct. Faith in God, even of the most intense variety, is invariably accompanied by doubt. The most religious people I know are those who acknowledge their struggles with belief and their constant efforts to confront and overcome them. Of course, many of us have met “in-your-face-believers” who proclaim the absolute certainty of their religious convictions. But in my experience, these are the people who, in fact, are eaten alive by doubt and feel the need to compensate with unending public affirmations of their faith. President Obama went on to suggest how the principle of religious humility must be applied in our lives. He condemned emphatically those in the Muslim world who distort their religion by acts of unrestrained self-righteousness. He expressed his horror at those who commit acts of barbarism in the name of Islam, substituting a cult of death for thoughtful belief. And he mentioned that other traditions, too, fall victim to lack of humility that leads to a deadly misuse of power. He gave as examples the Crusades, religious justifications for slavery and Jim Crow in the United States, and recent acts of religious violence in India. Here again, these are matters that are self-evidently true. While the President did not mention every major religion, Judaism included, he could have. All religious traditions succumb at certain times to an internal religious dynamic in which sacred texts are misused by extremist elements. They embrace a belief in a vengeful, hateful God, and use this belief to justify killing and fanaticism. In the remainder of the President’s remarks, he spoke movingly of America’s imperfect but impressive record of preserving religious dynamism and promoting religious moderation. America has done what most democracies have not by insisting on both freedom of speech and freedom of religion, while also maintaining separation between church and state. Americans, he said, have a vibrant religious life because they do certain things: They are humble about their religious convictions. They don’t allow government to get in the way of religious practice. And they defend the right of a person to insult another’s religion, while also using their freedom of speech to condemn such insults. One would think that both religious and political conservatives would have applauded the President’s remarks, which celebrated American religion and affirmed the centrality of religion in American society. But, in fact, exactly the opposite happened. [As noted in the Washington Post](http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obamas-speech-at-prayer-breakfast-called-offensive-to-christians/2015/02/05/6a15a240-ad50-11e4-ad71-7b9eba0f87d6%5Fstory.html), Jim Gilmore, the former Republican governor of Virginia, called the President’s comments “the most offensive I’ve ever heard a president make in my lifetime.” Southern Baptist leader Russell Moore said the speech’s sentiments were “an unfortunate attempt at a wrongheaded moral comparison,” suggesting that the President’s emphasis should have been on defeating ISIS and not the sins of Christianity. Why in heaven’s name the uproar, since the President’s words were so carefully chosen and so enthusiastically supportive of America’s religious way of life? In all probability, denial was at work here. As a religious person, I know that it is not easy to acknowledge the uncertainties that insidiously seep into my religious beliefs, leaving me with doubts that I am loathe to admit. But doubts there are, for me and for all religious believers, and the President was wise to remind me of them and suggest humility on my part. Also, as a patriotic American, I am always inclined to focus on what my country does right. But American history includes evil acts for which we Americans must be held accountable, with slavery being an irrefutable example. And as a committed Jew who resists with all his being criticism of my history and traditions, even when justified, I understand how a Christian colleague would instinctively resist reminders of Christian sins, including those—such as the Crusades—that happened long ago and have been acknowledged by the Church. The point is that it was the President’s honesty and sincerity that made his comments moving and powerful, especially since the sins and the doubts were not the heart of the speech. They were but the preview to his broader message that by grappling with such matters America has become the most religious of modern democracies, offering her citizens many paths to redemption, healing, and hope. The most bizarre criticism of the President [came from Ross Douthat](https://www.google.com/#q=Ross+Douthat+Obama+the+Theologian) of _The New York Time_ _s_. Douthat noted correctly that the President spoke in the spirit of Reinhold Niebuhr, the great Protestant theologian, and Douthat admitted the validity of much of the President’s argument. But, Douthat claimed, since the President is a political partisan, it must be assumed that he has partisan aims and that his use of theology is therefore inappropriate and must be discounted. In other words, the same conservatives who dismiss Obama as a secular progressive now condemn him when he makes an effort to express a religious message in religious language. This is absurd. While religious talk can be abused, of course, God is neither a liberal Democrat nor a conservative Republican, and struggling with God language and fundamental religious questions goes back to the earliest days of the Republic. Mr. Douthat should think back to the words of President Lincoln, our greatest President, at his second inaugural. Lincoln too suggested the need for religious humility, reminding us of a transcendent God whose will we cannot hope to entirely know, and drawing conclusions for a confused and hurting nation. We should thank President Obama for sharing with us his struggle with these questions and hope that future Presidents will do the same. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/"},"headline":"The Critics Were Wrong About Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech","datePublished":"2015-02-12T20:56:23.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T04:23:05.535Z","description":"It was not \"offensive.\" It was a powerful celebration of America's religious tradition.","url":"https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/","keywords":["politics"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt899bf52bfadf2aa6/69877f14cd1bba99f36f5312/obama-prayer-breakfast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Eric Yoffie","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/eric-h-yoffie/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt899bf52bfadf2aa6/69877f14cd1bba99f36f5312/obama-prayer-breakfast.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Obamas Attend National Prayer Breakfast","caption":"Obamas Attend National Prayer Breakfast","creditText":"Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3707288/the-critics-were-wrong-about-obamas-prayer-breakfast-speech/","name":"The Critics Were Wrong About Obama's Prayer Breakfast Speech"}}]}] ```