<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/" -->

---
title: We Should Be Laughing at Charlie Hebdo, Not Pledging Allegiance to It
description: The problem is that Charlie Hebdo is not supposed to be consumed with such religious fervor.
canonical: https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/
author: Guillemette Faure
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2015-01-14T17:09:08.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T03:33:58.514Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: We Should Be Laughing at Charlie Hebdo, Not Pledging Our Allegiance to It
og:description: The problem is that Charlie Hebdo is not supposed to be consumed with such religious fervor.
og:url: https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
og:image:width: 2099
og:image:height: 1181
og:image:alt: Charlie Hebdo Press Conference
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: We Should Be Laughing at Charlie Hebdo, Not Pledging Our Allegiance to It
twitter:description: The problem is that Charlie Hebdo is not supposed to be consumed with such religious fervor.
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&amp;width=1200&amp;quality=75&amp;auto=webp&amp;crop=16:9
---

![](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9)


# We Should Be Laughing at _Charlie Hebdo_, Not Pledging Our Allegiance to It

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="39084550-9ce0-43db-a6e5-97c22078c565" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=39084550-9ce0-43db-a6e5-97c22078c565&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=39084550-9ce0-43db-a6e5-97c22078c565&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=39084550-9ce0-43db-a6e5-97c22078c565&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Guillemette Faure](https://time.com/author/guillemette-faure/)


## Guillemette Faure


Jan 14, 2015 5:09 PM UTC

![Charlie Hebdo Press Conference](https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=3:2)

The new editor-in-chief of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, Gerard Biard, caricaturist Luz, Journalist Patrick Pelloux and editor-in-chief of French newspaper Liberation, Laurent Joffrin, hold a press conference about the next Charlie Hebdo edition, at the Liberation newspaper headquarters, in Paris, Jan. 13, 2015.

The new editor-in-chief of French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, Gerard Biard, caricaturist Luz, Journalist Patrick Pelloux and editor-in-chief of French newspaper Liberation, Laurent Joffrin, hold a press conference about the next Charlie Hebdo edition, at the Liberation newspaper headquarters, in Paris, Jan. 13, 2015. Yoan Valat—EPA

by 

[Guillemette Faure](https://time.com/author/guillemette-faure/)


## Guillemette Faure


Jan 14, 2015 5:09 PM UTC

If you turn the cover of _Charlie Hebdo_ upside down, you can see a penis. At least according to a journalist friend of mine. “This is how Luz always draws them,” he said, referring to prophets. I’m not sure I can see it. But I am sure this is what teenaged boys do: hide phalluses in cartoons. And _Charlie Hebdo_ used to be a newsroom of teenaged grandpas.

We were trying to make sense of the cover. “Everything Is Forgiven,” Muhammad crying and holding a “Je suis Charlie” sign. Was it a critique of the hypocritical support of _Charlie Hebdo_ by important figures? Was it mixing blasphemy with forgiveness, the most likable promise of all religions?

People were standing in line for the unveiling of its newest issue Wednesday morning, and it was sold out in my train station by 6:45 a.m. Terrorists have taken a struggling paper and made it the most sold-out publication in France. A young agent of the French police special operation unit who took part in the rescue operation told me he had only heard about _Charlie_ just before the attack. Even residents of Paris’ bourgeois 7th arrondissement, host to anti-gay marriage protests, seemed eager this morning to get their share of anticlerical jokes. As _Le Gorafi_, France’s version of _The Onion_, wrote this morning, “lots of French people wanted to touch printed paper for the first time.”

The problem is that _Charlie Hebdo_ is not supposed to be consumed with such religious fervor. We used to read it rapidly, sometimes disliking the jokes (and, for me, all the phalluses). _Charlie Hebdo_ was not designed to be read with an offense meter, every word and cartoon weighed. “Irresponsible magazine,” proclaims its cover. Cartoonist Luz was the first to feel both comforted and uncomfortable with the immense wave of support. Last week he reminded supporters that the newspaper was a fanzine, illustrated mostly by a gang of anarchist guys who didn’t want to grow up. “Charlie is not supposed to be a symbol,” he said. The day before this new issue, he advised readers to buy another paper along with _Charlie_.

The remaining team did the greatest thing they could have done: publish a new paper, on time. Not even one or two days earlier, like the weeklies that wanted to cash in on the tragedy. Not a day later, because of all the trouble they had to go through. Just on time. It was a regular _Charlie Hebdo_, with a regular Mohammed on its cover.

“When you don’t understand that you can’t draw a little guy, you keep drawing little guys,” wrote Luz in a cartoon for this new edition.

And yet here we are, unable to refrain from checking that everything is in place: Mohammed, the rabbis, and the popes. We’re relieved to see that the Catholic Church is also mocked (“Message to the Pope who supported us,” ends the editorial, “we would appreciate hearing the bells of the Vatican, but only if rung by the FEMEN”), even though we know offense-math is wrong, since religious people don’t get offended in the same way by the same things.

In the aftermath of the attacks, we French subscribed to the magazine to be sure it would stay alive. In just a few days, standing up for _Charlie_ became something of a patriotic gesture, akin to standing up for freedom of speech—even though _Charlie’s_ dead cartoonists hated patriotic gestures.

Living in a diverse neighborhood of Paris, I don’t want _Charlie_ to become a symbol of patriotism. We can’t impose an injunction against feeling offended as a sign of solidarity, even to those who should get the joke. “We don’t have to agree,” write the editors _Charlie Hebdo_ in the issue. “The cops died to defend ideas that maybe were not theirs.” The hardest thing today is to accept that, even when discussing matters of principle, we can disagree. Philippe Lançon, a _Charlie_ writer who survived the attack, wrote in the newspaper _Libération_ that the very morning of the attacks, _Charlie’s_ staff had a heated argument about terrorism. “We wanted to laugh and argue about everything,” he wrote.

In the current issue of _Charlie Hebdo_, Luz brilliantly summarizes these contradictory emotions that we all go through. He tries to assess the situation with two columns—plus and minus. On the plus side, huge crowds of people taking to the streets of Paris with _Charlie_ signs. On the minus side, having to hear the national anthem. On the plus side, Madonna supports Charlie (could she send her underwear?). On the minus side, having to shake the Prime Minister’s hand.

On the plus side, millions in financial help to go to print. And then this overwhelming minus: a bloody empty room.

_Guillemette Faure is a French writer and columnist for_ M_,_ Le Monde’s _weekend magazine._

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/"},"headline":"We Should Be Laughing at Charlie Hebdo, Not Pledging Our Allegiance to It","datePublished":"2015-01-14T17:09:08.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T03:33:58.514Z","description":"Standing up for the satirical newspaper became something of a patriotic gesture, even though Charlie’s dead cartoonists hated patriotic gestures","url":"https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/","keywords":["Media","Religion","faith","foreign affairs","Charlie Hebdo"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Guillemette Faure","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/guillemette-faure/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt0940361b75d4d325/698779a9f887dc5f93e897e0/charlie-hebdo-cover3.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Charlie Hebdo Press Conference","caption":"Charlie Hebdo Press Conference","creditText":"Yoan Valat—EPA","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/media/","name":"Media"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3667076/charlie-hebdo-satire-patriotism-free-speech/","name":"We Should Be Laughing at Charlie Hebdo, Not Pledging Our Allegiance to It"}}]}]
```

