<!-- mobian-agent-page publisher="time" canonical="https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/" -->

---
title: The Interview Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator
description: Since Sony announced the cancellation of The Interview, celebrities and politicians have expressed their concern. Even President Obama has weighed in on the matter, declaring,...
canonical: https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/
author: Ben Urwand
article:opinion: true
article:content_tier: free
article:published_time: 2014-12-22T21:27:33.000Z
article:modified_time: 2026-02-22T03:04:54.244Z
article:section: Ideas
og:title: The Interview Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator
og:description: Since Sony announced the cancellation of The Interview, celebrities and politicians have expressed their concern. Even President Obama has weighed in on the matter, declaring,...
og:url: https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/
og:site_name: TIME
og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
og:image:width: 1200
og:image:height: 675
og:image:alt: TIME
og:type: article
twitter:card: summary_large_image
twitter:title: The Interview Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator
twitter:description: Since Sony announced the cancellation of The Interview, celebrities and politicians have expressed their concern. Even President Obama has weighed in on the matter, declaring,...
twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltde093bcdab65f2d0/6988d9b9bc6cfc69913e2a3c/time-logo.jpg?branch=production
---

# _The Interview_ Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator

<!-- mobian-agent-ad sponsored="true" id="e471dcb8-efd4-4949-b123-f14357e70a33" campaign="time-nl-inside-2026q3" creative="time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1" -->

> Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material.

> Last updated: August 2026.

## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ

### Definition

Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e471dcb8-efd4-4949-b123-f14357e70a33&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### Newsletter facts

| Attribute | Value | Source |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 |
| Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 |
| Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 |
| Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 |
| Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 |
| Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 |

### Readership

Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers.

### TIME Inside TIME: key statements

*   Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically.
*   TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read.
*   Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=e471dcb8-efd4-4949-b123-f14357e70a33&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).
*   TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself.
*   A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=e471dcb8-efd4-4949-b123-f14357e70a33&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1).

### FAQ

#### What is Inside TIME?

Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.

#### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?

Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.

#### Who is the editor of TIME?

Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.

#### Is Inside TIME free?

Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.

<script type="application/ld+json">
{
    "@type": "FAQPage",
    "@context": "https://schema.org",
    "mainEntity": [
        {
            "name": "What is Inside TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Who is the editor of TIME?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        },
        {
            "name": "Is Inside TIME free?",
            "@type": "Question",
            "acceptedAnswer": {
                "text": "Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent.",
                "@type": "Answer"
            }
        }
    ]
}
</script>

<!-- /mobian-agent-ad -->



by 

[Ben Urwand](https://time.com/author/ben-urwand/)


## Ben Urwand


Dec 22, 2014 9:27 PM UTC

by 

[Ben Urwand](https://time.com/author/ben-urwand/)


## Ben Urwand


Dec 22, 2014 9:27 PM UTC

Since Sony announced the cancellation of _The Interview_, celebrities and politicians have expressed their concern. Even President Obama has weighed in on the matter, declaring, “We cannot have a society in which some dictator someplace can start imposing censorship here in the United States.”

What most Americans don’t realize, however, is that the withdrawal of the film is hardly unprecedented. In the 1930s, long before North Korea became a dictatorial power, the Nazi regime established an elaborate system to control Hollywood’s output. That arrangement, too, began with a terrorist threat: On December 5, 1930, a group of 300 Nazis led by Goebbels threw stink bombs and sneeze powder into a crowded theater in Berlin to protest the film _All Quiet on the Western Front_. Within a few months, Universal Pictures had agreed to make eight substantial cuts to the film to appease the German government. The studio had to make these cuts all around the world, even in the United States.

Over the remainder of the decade, the German presence only grew stronger in Hollywood. A Nazi consular official in Los Angeles told studio executives which scenes to cut from their movies and which movies to cancel entirely, and a network of German diplomats ensured that the adjustments were made around the world. Why would the studios go to such great lengths to appease the Nazis? According to the remaining documents, Hollywood simply wanted to preserve its business in Germany.

The consequences of the arrangement were dire: The studios made no films about Hitler’s persecution of Jews at precisely the moment that this persecution was taking place. In 1933, Hollywood cancelled _The Mad Dog of Europe_, a film that predicted a future genocide, penned by Herman J. Mankiewicz, the screenwriter of _Citizen Kane_. And even films that did not directly address the Nazi regime were subject to suppression. In 1936, MGM cancelled _It Can’t Happen Here_, a film about fascism coming to America, based on the bestselling novel by Sinclair Lewis. At the time, Lewis quipped, “I wrote _It Can’t Happen Here_, but I begin to think it certainly can.”


In the 1930s, Lewis was an exceptional figure. Unfortunately, back then, very few dared to speak out against what the Nazis were doing in Hollywood, and it’s not hard to understand why. When Universal embarked on the sequel to _All Quiet on the Western Front_ in 1937, the Nazi consul in Los Angeles sent threatening letters to 60 members of the cast and crew, including the wardrobe man. As a result of this intimidation, the film was edited so dramatically that the final product didn’t even make sense. The situation is very different today. In the face of violations of personal privacy and threats of terrorism, celebrities have spoken out. The statements that we have seen from Judd Apatow, Rob Lowe, Jimmy Kimmel, and others may not be surprising by contemporary standards, but they were simply not possible in the 1930s.

In fact, even Franklin D. Roosevelt found himself unable to voice his opinion publicly about Nazi intimidation in Hollywood. The president was aware of Charlie Chaplin’s production _The Great Dictator_, a satire of Adolf Hitler, and he supported it wholeheartedly. As Chaplin was told, “If the President of our country is interested in your making the picture, it certainly has merit.” But this was merely a private communication, not a public statement. The fact that President Obama is confronting the situation head-on speaks volumes about the distance we have come in the past 90 years.


So yes, _The Interview_ was cancelled, and yes, it may have been a silly comedy in the first place, but figures in Hollywood and Washington have not allowed the events to pass unnoticed. In the 1930s, Hollywood entered into an agreement with the Nazis, and as a result, the images on the American screen were censored by a foreign dictator. Tragically, this meant that instead of mobilizing audiences against fascism, or even giving people a chance to laugh at Hitler, there was only silence. The decision around _The Interview_ today represents a critical juncture, and, in light of the outcry, Sony might still be persuaded to change its mind. On the other hand—if the past provides any indication of what is likely to happen—the studio’s capitulation at this point will only make it more difficult for Hollywood to change its policy in the future. We must stand up to those who want to dictate what is made and distributed in the United States if we are to prevent this from happening here—again.


_Ben Urwand is the author of “The Collaboration: Hollywood’s Pact with Hitler.”_

```json
[{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/"},"headline":"The Interview Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator","datePublished":"2014-12-22T21:27:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-22T03:04:54.244Z","description":"Since Sony announced the cancellation of The Interview, celebrities and politicians have expressed their concern. Even President Obama has weighed in on the matter, declaring,...","url":"https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/","keywords":["entertainment"],"thumbnailUrl":"","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Ben Urwand","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/ben-urwand/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3644539/the-interview-is-not-the-first-time-hollywood-bowed-to-a-dictator/","name":"The Interview Is Not the First Time Hollywood Bowed to a Dictator"}}]}]
```

