--- title: Why The New FDA Gay Blood Ban Recommendations Are Meaningless description: Gay men can't donate blood or tissue, regardless of their HIV status. But a new FDA measure to ease the ban won't work, say some experts canonical: https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/ author: Alexandra Sifferlin article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-11-14T20:20:08.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T11:26:59.042Z article:section: Health og:title: Why New FDA Recommendations Against a Gay Blood Ban Are Meaningless og:description: Gay men can't donate blood or tissue, regardless of their HIV status. But a new FDA measure to ease the ban won't work, say some experts og:url: https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf6978ccffcdec8b2/69869b66cd804d7a43ccbe3e/photo-2-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 2448 og:image:height: 1377 og:image:alt: The National Gay Blood Drive is happening in 63 cities nationwide og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why New FDA Recommendations Against a Gay Blood Ban Are Meaningless twitter:description: Gay men can't donate blood or tissue, regardless of their HIV status. But a new FDA measure to ease the ban won't work, say some experts twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf6978ccffcdec8b2/69869b66cd804d7a43ccbe3e/photo-2-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Why New FDA Recommendations Against a Gay Blood Ban Are Meaningless > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: September 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ead70699-94cd-4aad-b4a8-a4b027875954&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Weekdays | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Weekly | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Twice a week | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | Source: TIME, August 2026. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ead70699-94cd-4aad-b4a8-a4b027875954&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=ead70699-94cd-4aad-b4a8-a4b027875954&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (health, weekdays), Worth Your Time (culture, weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, twice weekly), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=ead70699-94cd-4aad-b4a8-a4b027875954&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1) by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Nov 14, 2014 8:20 PM UTC  Courtesy of Alexandra Sifferlin by [Alexandra Sifferlin](https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/) ## Alexandra Sifferlin Nov 14, 2014 8:20 PM UTC Gay men are prohibited from donating blood and tissue, regardless of their HIV status, if they’ve had sex with a man since 1977\. And though technology and society have radically changed since the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) implemented the [ban](http://www.fda.gov/biologicsbloodvaccines/bloodbloodproducts/questionsaboutblood/ucm108186.htm) in 1983, the measure—which still bans donation by gay men, bisexual men and men who have sex with men (MSM)—has not. It began as a measure to prevent the spread of HIV through blood donations, back when there was no simple way to detect HIV in blood. Today, testing is simple, fast and effective. Several prominent medical groups like the [American Medical Association](http://healthland.time.com/2013/06/21/medical-association-says-gay-men-should-be-allowed-to-donate-blood/), America’s Blood Centers and the Red Cross [have opposed the ban](http://www.aabb.org/advocacy/statements/Pages/statement141114.aspx), calling it scientifically unsound and discriminatory. In 2013, 86 members of Congress [wrote](http://www.metroweekly.com/2013/08/congressional-bloc-pushes-prom/) to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) admonishing their delay in addressing what they believed to be an unnecessary ban. Since 2010, the FDA and HHS have considered revising the ban, and on Nov. 13, they finally moved forward with an advisory panel voting 16-2 to [adopt a one year deferral](http://time.com/3585329/fda-blood-donations-gay-bisexual-men/) which would allow men who have had sex with other men to give blood after remaining _abstinent_—not HIV negative—for one year. Advocates are calling the solution flimsy and unrealistic, telling TIME it’s one step forward and two steps back. “It doesn’t matter whether we go from a lifetime ban or a one- or five-year deferral, because I’m in a same sex marriage and, happily, having sex more than just once a year. I am still banned from donating, so in effect, it really doesn’t change anything,” says Jason Cianciotto, Director of Public Policy at Gay Men’s Health Crisis (GMHC). “I’ve been in a monogamous relationship for 11 years, married for 7 years, and I am not eligible to donate blood, but a person who identifies as heterosexual and admits to having sex with someone who is HIV positive is only deferred for 12 months.” Proponents for a more lenient ruling say that even despite the high number of sexually active gay men who will still be banned from donating, the current standards also provide a false sense of security. The ban places risk on individual identities and not on behavior, meaning a sexually active gay men who practices safe sex and is HIV negative is still deemed ineligible. Other countries have had success in changing their policies to behavior-based deferral, prioritizing a person’s actual risky sexual practices above their sexual orientation. Italy, for example, bans donations from _anyone_ who has recently had unsafe sex. They allow donations from gays and bisexuals who have had their blood tested and sexual activity deemed safe. The country has provided [data](http://www.luc.edu/media/lucedu/law/centers/healthlaw/pdfs/advancedirective/pdfs/issue11/9%5FKong%5FFormatted.pdf) showing MSM HIV-positive individuals do not outnumber HIV-positive individuals of other groups. **MORE:** [This National Blood Drive Is Fighting the FDA Ban on Gay Donors](http://time.com/2975958/this-national-blood-drive-is-fighting-the-fda-ban-on-gay-donors/) A [recent analysis](http://time.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/gates-goldberg-msm-blood-ban-jun-2010.pdf) from The Williams Institute estimates that if the ban were to be lifted, an additional 130,150 men would likely be able to donate 219,200 additional pints of blood each year. However, an August [article](http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/23/business/blood-industry-hurt-by-surplus.html?%5Fr=0) published in the _New York Times_ reports that the blood industry is shrinking due to the fact that blood transfusions are on the decline. Medical innovation has eased the need for transfusions, and therefore donations, the _New York Times_ says. “Changing the ban has never been a top priority for the FDA, and so I do not see this as an obstacle in allowing eligible gay/bisexual men to donate blood,” says Ryan James Yezak, founder of National Gay Blood Drive. “Part of our push for policy reform is to make the blood supply safer overall—regardless of the donor’s sexual orientation or the amount of blood that is needed at any given time.” In July, the National Gay Blood Drive held its second annual drive in more than 60 U.S. cities to bring attention to the ban. The drive asks gay and bisexual men to show their willingness to donate blood by bringing eligible “allies”—friends or family members—to donate in their place. In the [New York City drive,](http://time.com/2975958/this-national-blood-drive-is-fighting-the-fda-ban-on-gay-donors/) a total of 3,000 individuals participated in the event, saving up to 4,500 lives. The group also collected 44,326 signatures for a White House petition urging the FDA to change the ban. Yezak calls the latest development a step in the right direction, though it doesn’t eliminate sexual orientation from the process. But to others like GMHC’s Jason Cianciotto, a one-year deferral ultimately doesn’t even budge the issue forward. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/"},"headline":"Why New FDA Recommendations Against a Gay Blood Ban Are Meaningless","datePublished":"2014-11-14T20:20:08.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T11:26:59.042Z","description":"New steps to ease the ban on gay blood donations might not change much","url":"https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/","keywords":["Health Care","LGBT","FDA","hhs","LGBTQ","red cross"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf6978ccffcdec8b2/69869b66cd804d7a43ccbe3e/photo-2-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alexandra Sifferlin","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alexandra-sifferlin/"}],"articleSection":"Health","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltf6978ccffcdec8b2/69869b66cd804d7a43ccbe3e/photo-2-1-copy.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"The National Gay Blood Drive is happening in 63 cities nationwide","caption":"The National Gay Blood Drive is happening in 63 cities nationwide","creditText":"Courtesy of Alexandra Sifferlin","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/section/health/","name":"Health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/tag/health-care/","name":"Health Care"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3585641/fda-gay-blood-donation/","name":"Why New FDA Recommendations Against a Gay Blood Ban Are Meaningless"}}]}] ```