--- title: No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move description: When President Obama signs an executive action on immigration, Republicans will be angry, but there's not much they'll be able to do. canonical: https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/ author: Alex Rogers article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-10-30T16:11:20.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T11:05:46.860Z article:section: Politics og:title: No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move og:description: When President Obama signs an executive action on immigration, Republicans will be angry, but there's not much they'll be able to do. og:url: https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta995f2893793125e/6986867135ba6fb130c0114b/immigration-reform-protest.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3000 og:image:height: 1688 og:image:alt: Immigration Reform Rally og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move twitter:description: When President Obama signs an executive action on immigration, Republicans will be angry, but there's not much they'll be able to do. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta995f2893793125e/6986867135ba6fb130c0114b/immigration-reform-protest.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6587e495-2ccb-4fa1-8636-8dc11c441df5&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=6587e495-2ccb-4fa1-8636-8dc11c441df5&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=6587e495-2ccb-4fa1-8636-8dc11c441df5&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Alex Rogers](https://time.com/author/alex-rogers/) ## Alex Rogers Oct 30, 2014 4:11 PM UTC  With reform stalled in Congress, activists are urging Obama to act on his own. With reform stalled in Congress, activists are urging Obama to act on his own. Jason Redmond—REUTERS by [Alex Rogers](https://time.com/author/alex-rogers/) ## Alex Rogers Oct 30, 2014 4:11 PM UTC When President Obama signs an executive order giving temporary deportation relief and work authorization for millions of undocumented immigrants, Republicans across the country and on Capitol Hill will blow up. But there’s not much they can do about it that will make a difference. All Republican options have fatal flaws. Pass a bill to overrule the executive action? Obama will veto it. Try to override the veto? Not enough votes in the Senate, even if Republicans control it. Attach a rider to a government funding bill? End up with another unpopular government shutdown. Sue the president? Spend lots of taxpayer money and wait months if not years only to get rejected by a judge. Still, the last option on the list may be the one Republicans go with. While they are keeping their options open before the President shows his hand—as my colleague [Alex Altman reports](http://time.com/3546359/immigration-advocates-warn-obama-not-to-think-small/), it’s still unclear how big he will go—some have coalesced in favor of a lawsuit as the bare minimum response to what they think will be a monumental case in executive overreach. This week, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte [said](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DA4Axt5VeOM#t=81) on Fox that his recommendation to the Republican congressional leadership is to “immediately bring suit and seek an injunction restraining the president,” adding that he and his staff have been in “considerable communication” with House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy about how to respond to the President’s actions. Other Republicans have advocated for a lawsuit, including [Reince Priebus](http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2014/10/27/Exclusive-Priebus-Rallies-Base-GOP-Will-Stop-Obama-s-Un-American-Amnesty-If-We-Win-Senate), the chairman of the Republican National Committee, and Tennessee Republican Rep. Marsha Blackburn, who would “absolutely” support litigation to prevent the President’s executive action, according to spokesman Mike Reynard. Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) and Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.) have [supported](http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2014/08/08/Sessions-Amnesty-Overreach-Should-Be-Part%20of-Boehner-Lawsuit-Against-Obama?utm%5Fsource=twitterfeed&utm%5Fmedium=twitter&utm%5Fcampaign=breitbarttv#) it in the past. And on Wednesday, House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Michael McCaul implied that he would too. “Our Constitution requires the President to work with Congress to enact laws, not ignore Congress or the will of the people,” said McCaul in an emailed statement. “If the President decides to once again go it alone and grant amnesty through executive order by the end of the year, my colleagues and I will have no choice but to do everything in our power to stop him.” Over the summer, the House passed a Blackburn-sponsored bill designed to freeze the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program—limiting the number of children granted deferred deportation and work permits—and bar the President from taking future executive actions to expand efforts to postpone deportations. But the bill went nowhere in the Democratic-majority Senate and even under a Republican Senate it would face an Obama veto. A senior House Republican aide familiar with the issue says that expanding the litigation the House authorized in July over the Affordable Care Act is “certainly one option,” although no decisions have been made by the party conference. All that would need to happen to sue the president over his executive order is for the House to take another vote. (One reason, perhaps, why the previous suit has not yet been filed—first pointed out by [Washington _Monthly_](http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/ten-miles-square/2014/10/the%5Fcongressional%5Fresearch%5Fser052647.php?utm%5Fsource=dlvr.it&utm%5Fmedium=twitter)—is that the nonpartisan [Congressional Research Service](http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43710.pdf) agreed with legal experts in that the claim had no legal merit.) “We’ll continue to consult with our members and make a decision if and when the president acts,” says the aide. The Republicans’ response could very well depend on what the President does, “if and when” that occurs. Expanding DACA to include some family members of those already eligible could provoke a different reaction than smaller measures, such as expanding work permits for those in the agricultural or high-skilled tech sector, which business groups have pushed. [Immigration advocates](http://www.buzzfeed.com/adriancarrasquillo/the-final-recommendations-for-immigration-actions-are-being) counter that Obama might as well go big—affecting the lives of several million undocumented immigrants instead of around a million—because the GOP response is going to hold the same shrieking tenor no matter what. A lawsuit may have little merit besides making some noise. Last month, the National Immigration Law Center and the American Immigration Council distributed a [letter](http://www.americanimmigrationcouncil.org/newsroom/release/136-leading-experts-immigration-law-agree-president-has-legal-authority-expand-reli) sent to the White House signed by 136 immigration law experts claiming that the President has the authority to use prosecutorial discretion in preventing large numbers of undocumented immigrants from being deported. In July, one of those experts, Stephen Yale-Loehr of Cornell University Law School, told [TIME](http://time.com/3028637/obama-eyes-major-immigration-move/) that the President has “wide discretion when it comes to immigration,” adding that expanding DACA falls “within the president’s inherent immigration authority.” In a one-word statement, distinguished Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence H. Tribe told TIME that the GOP claim was “unlikely” to have standing. Of course, the legal merit of the lawsuit may not be all that important—simply announcing one could keep GOP Congressmen content with a ready response to constituent and reporter questioning in the immediate term. If and when the conservative backlash dies down, the party will be fully focused on 2016, when the GOP can undo Obama’s legacy by repainting the Oval Office red. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/"},"headline":"No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move","datePublished":"2014-10-30T16:11:20.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T11:05:46.860Z","description":"Republicans may sue the president, but it's not likely to get far in the courts","url":"https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/","keywords":["Congress","house","Immigration","Republican"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta995f2893793125e/6986867135ba6fb130c0114b/immigration-reform-protest.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Alex Rogers","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/alex-rogers/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta995f2893793125e/6986867135ba6fb130c0114b/immigration-reform-protest.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Immigration Reform Rally","caption":"Immigration Reform Rally / Protest in Tacoma, Washington","creditText":"Jason Redmond—REUTERS","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3546416/no-good-options-for-gop-on-obamas-immigration-move/","name":"No Good Options for GOP on Obama's Immigration Move"}}]}] ```