--- title: Ebola and the New Isolationism description: Closing borders between countries is not only impracticable but also counterproductive canonical: https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/ author: David Quammen article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-10-06T16:24:33.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T08:00:31.114Z article:section: Ideas og:title: Ebola and the New Isolationism og:description: Closing borders between countries is not only impracticable but also counterproductive og:url: https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc120e6a8b85acf0d/6986a72dcd6848769d096d83/ebolapbk_9780393351552-4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 1648 og:image:height: 927 og:image:alt: EbolaPbk.indd og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Ebola and the New Isolationism twitter:description: Closing borders between countries is not only impracticable but also counterproductive twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc120e6a8b85acf0d/6986a72dcd6848769d096d83/ebolapbk_9780393351552-4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Ebola and the New Isolationism > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=2051c79d-45f9-4b92-bd7b-7515d84aa1ed&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Subscribers | 430,000 | TIME, August 2026 | | Open rate | 50.7% | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=2051c79d-45f9-4b92-bd7b-7515d84aa1ed&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=2051c79d-45f9-4b92-bd7b-7515d84aa1ed&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. It reaches 430,000 subscribers with a 50.7% open rate as of August 2026. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ## Video: 5 Ebola Questions You're Wondering About [Watch (HLS stream): 5 Ebola Questions You're Wondering About](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9QwqrSi9.m3u8) (2:02)  _Published 2014-08-07. TIME Health Reporter Alexandra Sifferlin explains why there's no cure for Ebola, how infected patients are treated, and more common questions about the disease._ by [David Quammen](https://time.com/author/david-quammen/) ## David Quammen Oct 6, 2014 4:24 PM UTC  by [David Quammen](https://time.com/author/david-quammen/) ## David Quammen Oct 6, 2014 4:24 PM UTC Ebola has come to America, and the levels of alarm and confusion over this fearful virus have risen to new highs. With the case numbers continuing to climb in West Africa; with the scenes of misery and death in Monrovia, Freetown and other places reaching us through the media; and with the early mishandling of the case of Thomas Eric Duncan in Dallas, we’re seeing legitimate concern among many Americans about the protection of themselves and their families as well as loose talk about isolationist measures toward achieving that. Some people have suggested that we close airports, put entire countries within some kind of quarantine barrier and try to protect the U.S. from the threat of Ebola by isolating ourselves or others. Let’s close our borders to West Africans, some voices are saying. Better still, let’s close down Liberia and let no flights out. Or close U.S. airports to any incoming international flights. I’ve seen all those ideas offered in the flood of angry emails and tweets I’ve received recently on the subject of Ebola. Isolation is, indisputably, an important part of the fight against Ebola virus disease. But the form of isolation that’s crucial and feasible is isolation of individual patients—keeping them apart from other people during the symptomatic, infectious stages of their illness. This form of isolation depends on special wards and dedicated hospitals, containment suites where available, buildings converted to makeshift treatment centers, tents and plastic fences when nothing more can be had, plus the simple technique of barrier nursing, supported by tools such as masks, aprons, goggles, examination gloves, rubber boots, duct tape, bleach and plastic buckets to hold bleach solution for washing hands. Ebola is not a preternatural miasma; it’s a fluid-borne virus that can be stopped. If a patient dies, the isolation continues: trained burial workers in full protective gear handle the corpse, and the bereaved family and friends say their goodbyes from a safe distance. That’s hard but necessary. Isolation along national or regional boundaries or by categories of people is more problematic. Senegal closed its borders with Guinea in late August—at least those portions of the border that can’t be crossed freely by foot. The porosity of the borders of the three countries mainly affected (Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone) has been cited as one of the critical factors that allowed the outbreak to spread. But in rural landscapes of scattered forests, small villages and trails, porosity can’t be fixed with a few checkpoints. Liberia’s government sealed off a poor neighborhood of Monrovia around the same time using barbed wire, wooden barricades and armed police with riot shields and helmets; this worked badly, provoking outrage and riots. Eleven days later, the neighborhood was reopened. With intercontinental travel, there are even greater complications. How does a government prevent infected people who are not overtly sick from boarding a flight? A reporter at last week’s White House press conference on Ebola suggested withholding visas for travel to the U.S. until the Ebola-free health of each traveler had been confirmed. But how do you do that? Confine every applicant for 21 days (Ebola’s maximal incubation period) to strict observation before allowing that traveler to board a plane? What about the health professionals, aid workers and journalists who want to go home, to America or elsewhere, either because they have finished a hitch and are exhausted or because they’re infected themselves? Do you deny them the right of return? If so, how many trained people will then answer the call to go to West Africa? And without those brave and expert volunteers, how much worse will the situation get? When passengers from West Africa disembark at U.S. airports, there should be temperature screening by trained Customs and Border Protection agents and questions posed, with penalties for lying. This precaution isn’t yet in place, according to recent [reporting by Elizabeth Cohen of CNN](http://www.cnn.com/2014/10/01/health/ebola-us-no-reason-to-panic/), who returned from Liberia herself and was struck by the lackadaisical scrutiny she got. Stricter procedures and better screening tools are needed. It might even soon be possible to swab each traveler’s inner cheek for a touch of saliva, smear that onto a smartchip, and run the chip through a portable analyzer to detect Ebola RNA. I’m told this wouldn’t take much longer than the time we spend sending our shoes, belts and computers through the X-ray machine. If a person is carrying Ebola, that person must be isolated. Isolating entire countries is a more difficult proposition. Dr. Tom Frieden, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, has warned that the impulse to do that could make the Ebola epidemic worse. “Even if we tried to close the border,” [Frieden said](http://www.msnbc.com/morning-joe/ebola-ravages-us-defends) on Oct. 3, “it wouldn’t work.” In fact, it might backfire, he added, because isolating the affected countries would make helping them hard or impossible, which in turn would allow Ebola “to spread more there, and we’d be more likely to be exposed here.” The world is simply too interconnected. The only way, ultimately, to protect ourselves and our loved ones from Ebola virus disease is to support all efforts toward bringing the West African epidemic to an end. We’ve got to recognize that isolationism in the face of a 21st century epidemic is not only impracticable but also counterproductive. Ebola right now is a global concern, and the globe, last time I checked, includes America. _Acclaimed science writer Quammen, author of_ [Ebola: The Natural and Human History of a Deadly Virus](http://books.wwnorton.com/books/Ebola/) _(Norton), first had proximity to the Ebola virus while he was traveling in the jungles of Gabon, accompanied by local men whose village had been devastated by an outbreak. In this book, he tells the story of Ebola, including its past, present and unknowable future._ ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/"},"headline":"Ebola and the New Isolationism","datePublished":"2014-10-06T16:24:33.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T08:00:31.114Z","description":"Closing borders between countries is not only impracticable but also counterproductive","url":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/","keywords":["health","ebola"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc120e6a8b85acf0d/6986a72dcd6848769d096d83/ebolapbk_9780393351552-4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"David Quammen","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/david-quammen/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/bltc120e6a8b85acf0d/6986a72dcd6848769d096d83/ebolapbk_9780393351552-4.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"EbolaPbk.indd","caption":"EbolaPbk.indd","creditText":"","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/health/","name":"health"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/","name":"Ebola and the New Isolationism"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"5 Ebola Questions You're Wondering About","description":"TIME Health Reporter Alexandra Sifferlin explains why there's no cure for Ebola, how infected patients are treated, and more common questions about the disease.","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/9QwqrSi9/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2014-08-07T17:31:26.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/9QwqrSi9.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/","duration":"PT2M2S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/3475106/ebola-country-borders-new-isolationsism/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```