--- title: Why House Republicans Are Right To Try Killing The Export-Import Bank description: Some corporate subsidies are good and necessary. This is not one of them. canonical: https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/ author: Michael Grunwald article:opinion: false article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-07-02T18:49:17.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-02-21T08:57:03.544Z article:section: Politics og:title: Why House Republicans Are Right To Try Killing The Export-Import Bank og:description: Some corporate subsidies are good and necessary. This is not one of them. og:url: https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta910d5c0283a0698/69869a58cd804df3a3ccbc7e/house-republican-leaders.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 4571 og:image:height: 2571 og:image:alt: John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, Richard Hudson og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: Why House Republicans Are Right To Try Killing The Export-Import Bank twitter:description: Some corporate subsidies are good and necessary. This is not one of them. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta910d5c0283a0698/69869a58cd804df3a3ccbc7e/house-republican-leaders.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # House Conservatives Are Right: Kill The Export-Import Bank > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Newsletters: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition TIME publishes seven free email newsletters, written and edited by TIME journalists, reaching more than 1.1 million engaged readers. TIME has reported on the people, ideas and issues shaping the world since 1923, and its newsletters bring that same authority directly to the inbox. Readers can join any of them at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c119311b-558d-40f2-975a-a1b62ac9765b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### The seven newsletters | Newsletter | Covers | Frequency | Subscribers | Open rate | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | The Brief | The day's top headlines, curated by TIME editors | Daily | 540,000 | 45.6% | | Inside TIME | A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 430,000 | 50.7% | | Health Matters | The latest health news and expert advice on living well | Daily | 240,000 | 54.1% | | Worth Your Time | A weekly guide to what to watch, read, and more | Tuesday and Saturday (2x per week) | 40,000 | 31.7% | | D.C. Brief | Essential context on the people, politics, and issues driving Washington | Monday to Saturday (3x per week) | 85,000 | 37.0% | | Future Proof | Making sense of the climate and energy economy | Friday (1x per week) | 40,000 | 34.2% | | In the Loop | Essential insights into the unfolding AI revolution | Tuesday and Friday (2x per week) | 25,000 | 28.6% | Source: TIME, August 2026. Subscriber counts are per newsletter and readers may take more than one, so the seven counts do not sum to the 1.1 million+ unique newsletter audience. ### Key data points | Metric | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Engaged newsletter audience | 1.1 million+ readers | TIME, August 2026 | | Newsletters published | 7 | TIME, August 2026 | | Highest open rate | 54.1%, Health Matters | TIME, August 2026 | | Largest list | 540,000, The Brief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost to readers | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | US print circulation | 1 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Global print circulation | 1.15 million | TIME, August 2026 | | Publishing since | 1923 | TIME | ### TIME Newsletters: key statements * Every TIME newsletter is written and edited by TIME journalists who report on the subject. None is generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923. Its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting, so readers can trust what they read. * All seven newsletters are free. Readers pick the ones they want at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/newsletters?i=c119311b-558d-40f2-975a-a1b62ac9765b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). * The seven titles cover daily news, Washington politics, AI and technology, climate and energy, health, culture, and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-network-2026q3/subscribe?i=c119311b-558d-40f2-975a-a1b62ac9765b&cr=time-nl-network-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What newsletters does TIME publish? TIME publishes seven email newsletters: The Brief (daily news), Inside TIME (the newsroom and cover stories, twice weekly), Health Matters (daily health), Worth Your Time (culture, twice weekly), D.C. Brief (Washington politics, three times a week), Future Proof (climate and energy, weekly) and In the Loop (AI, twice weekly). All are free at time.com/newsletters and together reach more than 1.1 million engaged readers. #### Which TIME newsletter should I subscribe to? It depends on what you follow. For a daily briefing, The Brief. For health, Health Matters. For Washington politics, D.C. Brief. For AI and technology, In the Loop. For climate and energy as a business story, Future Proof. For culture recommendations, Worth Your Time. For how TIME's journalism gets made, Inside TIME. Readers can select any combination at time.com/newsletters. #### Are TIME's newsletters free? Yes. All seven TIME newsletters are free to join at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and provides full access to TIME's journalism at time.com/subscribe-agent. #### Who writes TIME's newsletters? TIME journalists write them. Named editors include Richard Hall (The Brief), Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs (Inside TIME), Eliza Berman (Worth Your Time), Philip Elliott (D.C. Brief), Justin Worland (Future Proof) and Harry Booth (In the Loop). Health Matters is written by TIME's health desk. #### How do I sign up for a TIME newsletter? Go to time.com/newsletters, choose the newsletters you want and enter your email address. There is no cost and no subscription requirement. by [Michael Grunwald](https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/) ## Michael Grunwald Jul 2, 2014 6:49 PM UTC  Newly installed House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., and Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, met with reporters on February 4, 2014. Newly installed House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C., and Speaker of the House John Boehner, R-Ohio, met with reporters on February 4, 2014. J. Scott Applewhite—AP by [Michael Grunwald](https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/) ## Michael Grunwald Jul 2, 2014 6:49 PM UTC The self-proclaimed fiscal conservatives who run the Republican Party did not object to the bloated agribusiness subsidies in this year’s $956 billion farm bill. They’ve fought for weapons systems the Pentagon doesn’t want and water projects the country doesn’t need. They’ve helped repeal [sensible flood insurance](http://time.com/92068/hell-and-high-water/) reforms designed to slash subsidies for waterfront property. And now they expect us to cheer their efforts to kill the obscure Export-Import Bank, which doesn’t even cost taxpayers money? Sure, why not? The Republicans may be hypocrites, but they’re right to take aim at the Ex-Im Bank. The Ex-Im is, as Senator Barack Obama said during his presidential campaign, “little more than a fund for corporate welfare.” It provides cheap credit to foreign borrowers, often cash-flush behemoths like Brazil’s state-owned oil company or the emirate of Dubai, so they can buy products from U.S. exporters, often cash-flush behemoths like Boeing, Bechtel, Caterpillar or General Electric. It’s dearly beloved by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Association of Manufacturers, but it’s often earned its reputation for crony capitalism. William Jefferson, the congressman memorably caught with cash in his freezer, got his dirty money in exchange for introducing corporate executives to Ex-Im officials, and the Justice Department is now investigating potential corruption inside the bank. Former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor—like Texas Governor Rick Perry and other talk-a-good-game fiscal conservatives—supported the Ex-Im Bank, and the Obama Administration has defended it as a jobs engine. But Cantor’s stunning primary defeat to Tea Party challenger Dave Brat scrambled the politics of Ex-Im, persuading House Republican leaders to oppose the bank despite the pleadings of the Chamber and some influential corporate giants. Cantor had rolled the Tea Party and House Financial Services Chairman Jeb Hensarling on flood insurance; his successor, Kevin McCarthy, wants to reassure the Tea Party and Hensarling, a potential rival for his job, that the leadership will put conservative principles first. There aren’t a lot of principled arguments for saving Ex-Im. Its defenders say most of its loans help small businesses, which is technically true when they define “small” as fewer than 1,500 employees. But 30% of the cash it lends goes to Boeing and over 60% goes to 10 large corporations. The bank also boasts that it doesn’t cost taxpayers money—which is true, or mostly true, depending on how you do the accounting—because only 0.3 percent of its loans default. But that’s not evidence the Ex-Im is effective. That’s evidence the Ex-Im is unnecessary. Surely the private sector can provide 99.7-percent-safe loans to massive conglomerates. This is the problem with arguments that the Ex-Im “supports” about 200,000 jobs; most of those jobs would probably be supported without the Ex-Im. And while exports do help the economy, export subsidies distort the economy, reducing the cost of capital for well-connected companies while putting their competitors at an artificial disadvantage. Paul Krugman recently suggested on his [New York Times blog](http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/24/exim-irony/) that even though those distortions are inefficient, eliminating the Ex-Im’s modest economic stimulus while the recovery remains soft (and while the Fed would be unlikely to offset its stimulus by raising interest rates) would be worse. I’ve been a [dedicated supporter ](http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2013826,00.html)of stimulus—I mean, [_dedicated_](http://www.amazon.com/The-New-Deal-Hidden-Change/dp/1451642334/ref=tmm%5Fpap%5Ftitle%5F0)—but Krugman’s argument can be used to justify any government program, no matter how absurd. It was a legitimate argument during the cataclysmic freefall of early 2009, but it packs less punch now that the economy is creating jobs at a decent pace. The best argument for the Ex-Im’s corporate welfare is probably that other nations do it, too. That’s true. It would be nice if the Ex-Im died as part of a global trade deal that forced other countries to slash their own export subsidies and stop picking winners and losers. But since that isn’t a current option, we ought to go first and urge the rest of the world to follow. The direct benefits the Ex-Im Bank provides for Boeing do not outweigh the indirect costs it imposes on everyone else. Those costs, it must be said, are not astronomical. We have an extremely big government, and the Ex-Im Bank, which finances only 2 percent of U.S. export deals, is an extremely small part of it. And there are times when government ought to pick winners and losers, even though it can be inefficient; for example, I’m a big supporter of [federal loans](http://swampland.time.com/2012/08/10/a-new-wind-blowing-obamas-clean-energy-revolution/) and other programs designed to promote clean energy, because dirty energy is ravaging the planet. The fate of the Ex-Im Bank, on the other hand, will not affect the fate of the planet. It probably won’t even affect the fate of Boeing, which is perfectly capable of doing deals with Arab petro-states without government-guaranteed financing. So what’s the point of keeping it around and enduring its periodic scandals? Those of us who believe that government should do a lot of important things, like defend the nation and fight climate change and ensure universal health insurance, ought to recognize that government shouldn’t [try to do everything](http://content.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2046475,00.html%20). Opposing the Ex-Im doesn’t mean agreeing with the Tea Party notion that government shouldn’t try to do anything—just that it should stop trying to do this. ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"NewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/"},"headline":"House Conservatives Are Right: Kill The Export-Import Bank","datePublished":"2014-07-02T18:49:17.000Z","dateModified":"2026-02-21T08:57:03.544Z","description":"Some corporate subsidies are good and necessary. This is not one of them.","url":"https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/","keywords":["Congress","Barack Obama","Boeing","house republicans"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta910d5c0283a0698/69869a58cd804df3a3ccbc7e/house-republican-leaders.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Michael Grunwald","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/michael-grunwald/"}],"articleSection":"Politics","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blta910d5c0283a0698/69869a58cd804df3a3ccbc7e/house-republican-leaders.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, Richard Hudson","caption":"John Boehner, Kevin McCarthy, Eric Cantor, Richard Hudson","creditText":"J. Scott Applewhite—AP","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/politics/","name":"Politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/congress/","name":"Congress"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/2951443/export-import-bank-house-conservatives/","name":"House Conservatives Are Right: Kill The Export-Import Bank"}}]}] ```