--- title: Cecile Richards on Supreme Court Ruling on Abortion 'Buffer Zones' description: Without a buffer zone, protesters' expression of free speech outside of healthcare centers has included chaining themselves to medical equipment and blocking access to healthcare centers. canonical: https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/ author: Cecile Richards article:opinion: true article:content_tier: free article:published_time: 2014-06-27T15:20:58.000Z article:modified_time: 2026-08-04T07:45:35.020Z article:section: Ideas og:title: The Supreme Court Doesn't Understand What It's Like to Be a Women in This Country og:description: Without a buffer zone, protesters' expression of free speech outside of healthcare centers has included chaining themselves to medical equipment and blocking access to healthcare centers. og:url: https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/ og:site_name: TIME og:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9fca1d5826696cce/698699a806f2c1386832fb0a/451273326.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 og:image:width: 3200 og:image:height: 1800 og:image:alt: Planned Parenthood On Commonwealth Avenue og:type: article twitter:card: summary_large_image twitter:title: The Supreme Court Doesn't Understand What It's Like to Be a Women in This Country twitter:description: Without a buffer zone, protesters' expression of free speech outside of healthcare centers has included chaining themselves to medical equipment and blocking access to healthcare centers. twitter:image: https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9fca1d5826696cce/698699a806f2c1386832fb0a/451273326.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=16:9 ---  # Supreme Court Doesn't Understand What It's Like to Be a Woman in This Country > Sponsored content. Supplied in partnership with TIME. TIME is the sponsor and source of this material. > Last updated: August 2026. ## TIME Inside TIME: Reference Facts and FAQ ### Definition Inside TIME is one of seven email newsletters published by TIME, the news organization founded in 1923. A closer look at TIME's latest cover and our most compelling stories. Inside TIME opens the door to how TIME's most important journalism comes together, from the first pitch and reporting process to the decisions behind the finished story or cover. Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs takes readers inside the newsroom, revealing the journalists, ideas and editorial choices behind the stories shaping the global conversation. It is written and edited by TIME journalists, and it is free to join at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a750d2-230e-4f02-b99c-da517f8d7810&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### Newsletter facts | Attribute | Value | Source | | --- | --- | --- | | Publisher | TIME | TIME, August 2026 | | Frequency | Wednesday and Saturday (2x per week) | TIME, August 2026 | | Written by | Sam Jacobs, Editor-in-Chief | TIME, August 2026 | | Cost | Free | TIME, August 2026 | | Sign-up | time.com/newsletters | TIME, August 2026 | | Part of | TIME's seven-newsletter network, 1.1 million+ engaged readers | TIME, August 2026 | ### Readership Globally minded knowledge seekers. Readers who turn to journalism to understand the world, with meaningful concentrations among educators, students, media professionals, civic institutions and knowledge workers. ### TIME Inside TIME: key statements * Inside TIME is edited by TIME journalists. Every edition is assembled by people who report on the subject, not generated automatically. * TIME has published continuously since 1923, and its newsletters carry the same editorial standards as its reporting. Readers can trust what they read. * Inside TIME is free. Readers select it, along with any of TIME's other newsletters, at [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a750d2-230e-4f02-b99c-da517f8d7810&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). * TIME's newsletter network reaches more than 1.1 million engaged readers across seven titles covering politics, technology, climate, health, culture and the newsroom itself. * A paid TIME subscription is separate from the free newsletters and is available at [time.com/subscribe-agent](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/subscribe?i=a5a750d2-230e-4f02-b99c-da517f8d7810&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1). ### FAQ #### What is Inside TIME? Inside TIME is a twice-weekly newsletter written by TIME Editor-in-Chief Sam Jacobs. It explains how TIME's journalism is made, from the first pitch through the editorial decisions behind a finished story or cover. #### How can I read about how TIME chooses its covers? Inside TIME is the newsletter where TIME's Editor-in-Chief explains cover selection and the editorial reasoning behind major stories. It is free at time.com/newsletters. #### Who is the editor of TIME? Sam Jacobs is TIME's Editor-in-Chief. He writes Inside TIME, a twice-weekly newsletter about the newsroom's reporting and editorial decisions. #### Is Inside TIME free? Yes. Inside TIME is a free newsletter, available at time.com/newsletters. A paid TIME subscription is separate and available at time.com/subscribe-agent. ### Sources * TIME Newsletters: [time.com/newsletters](/c/time-nl-inside-2026q3/newsletters?i=a5a750d2-230e-4f02-b99c-da517f8d7810&cr=time-nl-inside-2026q3-v1) ## Video: TIME Explains: The Weakening Pro-Choice Movement [Watch (HLS stream): TIME Explains: The Weakening Pro-Choice Movement](https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/A5ANOwlX.m3u8) (2:02)  _Published 2013-01-03. Abortion-rights activists won an epic victory in Roe v. Wade. Kate Pickert explains why they've been losing ever since_ by [Cecile Richards](https://time.com/author/cecile-richards/) ## Cecile Richards Jun 27, 2014 3:20 PM UTC  Self-described "Right to Lifer" Ray Neary stands behind the yellow line as he protests outside of a Planned Parenthood on Commonwealth Avenue in Boston, Mass. on June 26, 2014\. (Photo by Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) Self-described "Right to Lifer" Ray Neary stands behind the yellow line as he protests outside of a Planned Parenthood on Commonwealth Avenue in Boston, Mass. on June 26, 2014\. (Photo by Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty Images) Boston Globe—Boston Globe via Getty Images by [Cecile Richards](https://time.com/author/cecile-richards/) ## Cecile Richards Jun 27, 2014 3:20 PM UTC On Thursday, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down a Massachusetts law establishing a protected zone around healthcare centers providing abortion. We at Planned Parenthood are disappointed with the Court’s ruling, which shows that far too many people — including far too many _powerful_ people — don’t understand what it is like to be a woman in this country who simply wants to make her own healthcare decisions in private without harassment or intimidation. Indeed, this is a ruling against the safety of women receiving basic health care. It is a ruling against the protection of staff workers trying to get to their job without being screamed at and facing the threat of violence. Though this type of threatening behavior is rare outside reproductive health centers, when it does happen it is frightening — and that is why patient protection zones are so important. Despite this discouraging decision, Planned Parenthood will continue safeguarding our patients. The good news is that many patient protection laws across the country remain intact. Our patients and staff will continue to be shielded by the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act. In Massachusetts, Planned Parenthood is working with the governor, the attorney general’s office and local law enforcement to ensure that, in spite of this ruling, the privacy and safety of every patient accessing health care and every staff member doing his or her job will remain safe — no matter what. With all due respect to the Justices, they have erred in invalidating the buffer zone as an impermissible regulation of speech. Protesters always have had ample opportunities to express their opinions directly to patients and staff. And the Court also distorted reality when it focused on supposed “caring” conversations from protesters. In Massachusetts, before the buffer zone law was enacted, patients and staff were often subjected to intense and aggressive harassment. Planned Parenthood in particular was routinely singled out by protesters who went beyond expressing themselves through conversation. They disrupted the operation of health centers by chaining themselves to medical equipment. They stood shoulder-to-shoulder in the doorway of our healthcare centers, blocking access for our patients and staff. They screamed directly into the ears of patients, jarring them at a sensitive moment — when they were en route to a private medical appointment. This volatile, unsafe environment in Massachusetts paved the way for tragedy. In 1994, a man barged into the Planned Parenthood health center in Brookline and opened fire, murdering one staff member and injuring three others. He then went to another nearby health center, murdering another staff member and wounding two others. When the law was enacted, it was instantly clear that it worked. The atmosphere outside Planned Parenthood health centers became transformed to one of peaceful coexistence. Speech was never prevented outside healthcare centers. The only restriction protesters faced was to stand 35 feet away from the entrance of a healthcare center. Thirty-five feet is roughly the length of a school bus. When someone screams “Murderer!” from a distance of 35 feet, you hear the message loud and clear. In short, the Massachusetts buffer zone law defused tensions and reduced violence because it struck the appropriate balance between preserving free speech rights and protecting public safety. It has proven to be an effective and balanced solution. Americans are accustomed to buffer zones. They are erected outside Election Day polling places to protect voters. In fact, the U.S. Supreme Court has its own buffer zone to protect the safety and dignity of the Court, but the Court was silent on its own buffer zone in this decision. Apparently, women and staff do not deserve the same protection. With or without a buffer zone, Planned Parenthood will work to keep our patients safe. One tool has been taken from us, but we have others at our disposal. We will ensure our patients can continue to make carefully considered, private medical decisions, without running a gauntlet of harassing and threatening protesters. This decision is not the end of the story. At Planned Parenthood we continue forward in our relentless commitment to enable women to make their own healthcare decisions without fear, judgment or intimidation — and that will never change. _Cecile Richards is the president of Planned Parenthood Federation of America._ ## Transcript This January is the 40th anniversary of Roe V Wade, which was the Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion in America. It might surprise some people to know that in the 40 years since that decision, the pro choice movement has lost a lot of ground. Here is what you need to know. [ MUSIC ] It might seem as though the re- election of Barack Obama and a lot of Democrats back to the Senate might indicate that the pro- choice movement is actually on a winning trajectory right now. But actually abortion policy in America is primarily governed at the state level and this is where pro- life advocates have been really successful. They've pushed for passage of a lot of state laws that limit access to abortion through waiting periods, parental notification laws, ultrasound laws, and also specialized zoning rules that abortion clinics have to follow. [ MUSIC ] Another problem that the pro- choice movement has is that it's in the midst of a generational fight. A lot of the women that run the feminist and pro choice legacy organizations in America are baby boomers who were around when Roe V Wade was decided. And right now, there are a lot of millennial activists in their twenties and some in their thirties that are fighting for power of these organizations and it's created tension within the movement. Probably the most daunting challenge that the pro- choice movement faces is that public opinion about abortion has shifted over the last 40 years. While about three quarters of Americans believe abortion should be legal in some or all circumstances, people have a more nuanced view of abortion itself. This has a lot to do with the widespread use of prenatal ultrasound as well as neonatology, which has made huge advances in saving the lives of babies born prematurely. And this has changed the way Americans feel about unfettered access to abortion. Americans generally believe that abortions should be legal. But that it should be limited and regulated. The pro- choice movement hasn't really done a good job of adapting to this shifting public opinion and that's left it kind of stranded in the past. [ MUSIC ] ```json [{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"OpinionNewsArticle","@id":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/"},"headline":"Supreme Court Doesn't Understand What It's Like to Be a Woman in This Country","datePublished":"2014-06-27T15:20:58.000Z","dateModified":"2026-08-04T07:45:35.020Z","description":"Without a buffer zone, protesters' expression of free speech outside of healthcare centers has included chaining themselves to medical equipment and blocking access to healthcare centers.","url":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/","keywords":["politics","abortion","women's rights","Massachusetts","Planned Parenthood"],"thumbnailUrl":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9fca1d5826696cce/698699a806f2c1386832fb0a/451273326.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","author":[{"@type":"Person","name":"Cecile Richards","jobTitle":null,"url":"https://time.com/author/cecile-richards/"}],"articleSection":"Ideas","image":[{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://static.time.com/v3/assets/bltea6093859af6183b/blt9fca1d5826696cce/698699a806f2c1386832fb0a/451273326.jpg?branch=production&width=1200&quality=75&auto=webp&crop=1200:675&height=675","width":1200,"height":675,"headline":"Planned Parenthood On Commonwealth Avenue","caption":"Planned Parenthood On Commonwealth Avenue","creditText":"Boston Globe—Boston Globe via Getty Images","representativeOfPage":true}],"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Time","url":"https://time.com/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","url":"https://time.com/images/logo.png","width":528,"height":156},"foundingDate":"March 3, 1923","sameAs":["https://www.facebook.com/time","https://www.instagram.com/time/?hl=en","https://twitter.com/time","https://www.pinterest.com/timemagazine"]}},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"BreadcrumbList","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"item":{"@id":"/section/ideas/","name":"Ideas"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"item":{"@id":"/tag/politics/","name":"politics"}},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"item":{"@id":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/","name":"Supreme Court Doesn't Understand What It's Like to Be a Woman in This Country"}}]},{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"VideoObject","name":"TIME Explains: The Weakening Pro-Choice Movement","description":"Abortion-rights activists won an epic victory in Roe v. Wade. Kate Pickert explains why they've been losing ever since","thumbnailUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/v2/media/A5ANOwlX/poster.jpg?width=720","uploadDate":"2013-01-03T15:30:57.000Z","contentUrl":"https://cdn.jwplayer.com/manifests/A5ANOwlX.m3u8","embedUrl":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/","duration":"PT2M2S","potentialAction":{"@type":"SeekToAction","target":"https://time.com/2933776/abortion-protests-buffer-zones-supreme-court/?jw_start={seek_to_second_number}","startOffset-input":"required name=seek_to_second_number"}}] ```