TIME Surveillance

Seattle Police to Use Facial Recognition Software

Security Camera
Getty Images

Seattle will become the nation's largest city to employ the emerging technology, although privacy experts expressed concerns that information about people not suspected of criminal activity could be gathered and misused

The Seattle Police Department will soon use facial recognition software allowing officers to compare photos captured by surveillance cameras with an existing database of 350,000 mug shots. Seattle will become the nation’s largest city to employ the emerging technology and its use will be watched closely by other municipalities.

“I think it’s a sign of what’s to come,” says Stephen Rushin, an expert in surveillance and law enforcement technology at the University of Illinois College of Law.

Seattle police have wanted to use facial-recognition technologies for several years to replace manually comparing hundreds of thousands of mug shots with images captured by the city’s network of surveillance cameras. But privacy experts expressed concerns that information about people not suspected of criminal activity could be gathered and misused.

“Whenever you’re accumulating large amounts of data, you have the potential for abuse,” Rushin says. “It could be used to unfairly implicate innocent people.”

The ACLU says it had serious reservations about making sure use of the facial recognition software was limited to people reasonably suspected of criminal activity, and that the police department agreed to track which officers used the software to prevent it from being deployed broadly. The Seattle City Council voted to approve the program this week after the ACLU dropped its objection.

The city is using a $1.6 million grant from the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to fund the program. There’s little data about how many police departments are using facial recognition, but Rushin says it’s likely in the single-digit percentile of police departments.

Though the ACLU signed off, it remains wary. “We’re still concerned about the possibility for abuse,” says Doug Honig of the ACLU of Washington.

Tap to read full story

Your browser is out of date. Please update your browser at http://update.microsoft.com


Dear TIME Reader,

As a regular visitor to TIME.com, we are sure you enjoy all the great journalism created by our editors and reporters. Great journalism has great value, and it costs money to make it. One of the main ways we cover our costs is through advertising.

The use of software that blocks ads limits our ability to provide you with the journalism you enjoy. Consider turning your Ad Blocker off so that we can continue to provide the world class journalism you have become accustomed to.

The TIME Team